- Joined
- Oct 25, 2006
- Messages
- 116
- Reaction score
- 2
How long did it take you to study for BCPS? How did you approach it? Any advice?
Thanks!
Thanks!
This happened to me no less than 8-9 times during BCOP. The person next to me disconnected about 2 times.
Throughout the exam, I kept wondering whether or not I would be able to submit the entire exam at all; a colleague of mine who took the BCPS in the SF Bay Area said that her part 2 completely crashed and had to reschedule for a later week.
Of course these interruptions added unnecessary anxiety and frustration throughout the exam. I felt that these issues also challenged the integrity of the exams; imagine having answered 30-40 questions before you're asked to reschedule the exam for a later date. What's to stop individuals from looking up answers to questions that they had seen?
I won't be calling BPS anytime soon, but I made sure to leave them a 3000-word novel for feedback in the end
I emphasized the need to iron out these technical issues, or to go back to the old paper/scantron model...
Thanksgiving can't come soon enough. So where do I sign up for next year's exam?
Does anybody know how we are supposed to get our results???
Did you get to finish the exam ? if you did, you still may have passed
Does anybody know how we are supposed to get our results???
If you read the bps website, it says you get an email with a link to access your results.
I did finish, but couldn't focus on reviewing the questions I had flagged; and I had flagged what seemed like >60% of the exam hahaha. After the 9th disconnect, I just wanted to get to the end to submit it and not have to reschedule for the next week in case the exam completely crashed. Not a terribly clever move on my part now looking in retrospect. Bah. I guess there's only one way to find out
I received my BCPS results (scantron exam) via snail mail during Thanksgiving. Even if the exam is now electronic, I think BPS historically holds on to them for +/- 60 days to conduct audits and determine the curve. I wouldn't expect anything differently this year.
Hmm puzzling how you arrived at that conclusion :XThis is 2nd time you are taking the test and you still had to guess on >60 % of the exam ?
This happened to me no less than 8-9 times during BCOP.
I received my BCPS results (scantron exam) via snail mail during Thanksgiving.
Hmm puzzling how you arrived at that conclusion :X
News flash: BCPS =/= BCOP
Don't get upset, nobody thinks you're dumb on this anonymous forum if you had taken the same test twice. ..
Oh, upset I'm not
Maybe a tad annoyed, but I was merely pointing out my observations...
Being the Type A that I am, I just felt compelled to highlight the fallacious reasoning. That is all.
Good luck to all
$125 includes:
-- 2013 lectures on audio (can be played on any android, windows based, or just load into iTunes on iPhone...great to listen to in the car on the way to work or at the gym)
-- Complete chapters of both 2013 books
-- PowerPoint slides
**2013 version includes lots of updates to guidelines
$45 includes:
--2013 mock exam questions and answers (200 questions)
--2011 mock exam questions and answers (98 questions)
If interested, send me a private message. Thanks.
I dont know why theres not much support this yr. I joined just for the fact that i saw sooo much support last year and i thought would be a good thing to join. From what I saw i thought the test is a passable test. I prayed hard and studied hard. Will see I just nervous and just want to know the results so I can get on with other things. I think BPS need to work on the wait. In my opinion i think 30 days max. I did not do the mock test but used the high yield med reviews . Did the biostats part abt 4 times each and did all the biostats questions in the high yield reviewI'm not sure why there isn't much more talk this year. There seems to have been much more discussion and support the past few years. I do believe some questions get thrown out and the passing scores have varied from low to high. It really varies each year. I posted my thoughts previously, but I thought the test was better than I expected. I guess I based this on the mock exam, which I thought was difficult. So, I went into it thinking the test was going to be much the same. I don't know if I passed, but I did the best I could with the time I had available. I did study the stats/reg. stuff, but I just don't feel comfortable with it...IDK. I thought it was a bit more involved than the mock exam. I am opposite you on the clinical stuff. I think I did better on that. Anyway, GL to all.
This chart tells me it varies considerably year to year lol. Are we in a good year?
I have no inside information. This is just a hunch, but I think I may have figured out the sort of scoring method they used this year. It's called the modified Angoff method.
It sounds a lot like the grading description on the BCPS site. It would seem you get more credit for getting difficult questions correct, but I may have that backwards lol.
I always suspected that BPS exams were scored with some curving component; okay, maybe not a true bell-shaped curve, but a curve nonetheless. For one thing, the pass rate patterns for some tests are obviously too consistent to support pure raw-scoring.
After reading about the modified Angoff method, it sounds like a possibility; especially since some form of curving is already built-into the method. And while many explanations can be used for the "outlier" scores like the 55% passing-rate on the 2010 BCPS, it would seem so can the modified Angoff method (the passing-score for that year was 133--the score was the highest needed for the last 3 years, but the pass-rate was the lowest over the last 6 years).
Interesting discussion.
Frankly, I don't know that. And perhaps this year's score will be 148, or even 168. Personally, passing score does not interest me as much as percentile and/or passing rate. The passing score could hypothetically be 100 for an 'incredibly difficult' exam, but still have a passing rate of 70%. From a passing-perspective to me, that's really no different than a passing score of 180 on an 'easy exam', with a passing rate of 70%.... because in both scenarios, out of 10 people that take the exam, 3 will not be invited to pay dues.How do you know the passing score this year won't be 148 ?
Frankly, I don't know that. And perhaps this year's score will be 148, or even 168. Personally, passing score does not interest me as much as percentile and/or passing rate. The passing score could hypothetically be 100 for an 'incredibly difficult' exam, but still have a passing rate of 70%. From a passing-perspective to me, that's really no different than a passing score of 180 on an 'easy exam', with a passing rate of 70%.... because in both scenarios, out of 10 people that take the exam, 3 will not be invited to pay dues.
So regardless of what the passing score will be, given BCPS historical data for the past 6 years (except 2010), I have reasonable doubt that the passing rate will be much different from 70%. So again, out of 10 people that take the exam, 3 will fail.
I thought the first exam wasn't till 2015?If I pass this test in December, I plan on taking the ICU specialty boards next year. Next year will be the very first year they will be offering this exam. Is it true that first year they offer these type of board exam is the easiest ? somebody told me this once.
Not offerred until 2015. and I'm sure there is going to be the requirement that you have to have completed a critical care residency or worked in ICUs for x number of years prior to taking the ICU board.I thought the first exam wasn't till 2015?
I was told it was going to be offered in 2014 ? I do qualify, I worked in ICU for good 6-7 years now. and I have general residency done.Not offerred until 2015. and I'm sure there is going to be the requirement that you have to have completed a critical care residency or worked in ICUs for x number of years prior to taking the ICU board.
I was told it was going to be offered in 2014 ?
I've heard both sides of the argument. Some think that it'll be easier the first year, because... it's the first year. Others think that it'll be harder because you have all these ICU specialists who have been publishing papers on this topic for the last several decades taking the same exam. So it would come down to how you believe the test is graded; for example, if you don't believe it's 'curved' in any sense, then the previous sentence really wouldn't impact you.Is it true that first year they offer these type of board exam is the easiest ? somebody told me this once.
Okay, enough of devil's advocacy for today...
From BPS:
"We hope to administer the first examination in each new specialty in 2015"
http://bpsweb.org/news/pr_041513.cfm
Looks like you've got extra time to study.
I've heard both sides of the argument. Some think that it'll be easier the first year, because... it's the first year. Others think that it'll be harder because you have all these ICU specialists who have been publishing papers on this topic for the last several decades taking the same exam. So it would come down to how you believe the test is graded; for example, if you don't believe it's 'curved' in any sense, then the previous sentence really wouldn't impact you.
On the other hand for BCACP, the pass-rate dropped 3.4% from the first year to the second year. Then again, could be a flux. Who knows
Okay, enough of devil's advocacy for today...
Does anyone have any data on the first few years for psychiatry and oncology?
I took the exam this year. When it comes to grading, what I am concerned about more than anything, is the fact that, from what I can tell, everyone took the same test with the same exact questions.
For a apparently scaled/curved exam, it seems like this would give an advantage to people who took the exam during the later dates.
Any thoughts?
A colleague of mine who took the BCPS in the SF Bay Area said that her part 2 completely crashed and had to reschedule for a later week.
Of course these interruptions added unnecessary anxiety and frustration throughout the exam. I felt that these issues also challenged the integrity of the exams; imagine having answered 30-40 questions before you're asked to reschedule the exam for a later date. What's to stop individuals from looking up answers to questions that they had seen?
I think you are right. they just may increase the rate and pass 90 % of the people this year. Otherwise there maybe too many lawsuits.I was also surprised that they offered a range of dates this year. Up until now, the exams were administered on paper on the same date across the country; with exceptions made on an individual basis. With the exams being electronic now, I, too, was expecting a test bank, but couldn't verify that since I didn't know anyone who took the same test this year.
In the past, when test banks were brought up during discussions with law-school friends, the issue of discrimination claims always came up. Perhaps test banking was not adopted by BPS to prevent potential disputes of discrimination or testing unfairness; where tests are not administered to each individual the same as other individuals for that year.
But that's not to say the tests are flawless and perfectly fair; of course since it's illegal to share actual test questions on these exams with other individuals, no one will publicly admit to have received answers/advantage from individuals who took the exams earlier.
Even if no help was received from others, what's to prevent individuals from looking up answers to questions they had already seen before they were asked to reschedule the exam due to technical difficulties, which many people seemed to have experienced this year?
This year was full of tricky. I wonder how/if this will affect the passing score and/or passing rate.
I think you are right. they just may increase the rate and pass 90 % of the people this year. Otherwise there maybe too many lawsuits.
As someone who took it on the first day it was offered, I would be upset if I didn't pass. Of course no one knows how they grade the exam, but If I get what seems to have been a passing score the past couple years and don't pass I would begin to question it.
I can empathize with this sentiment. But seeing as the passing score for BCPS within the last 4 years varied by as much as 22 points, out of curiosity, when would you begin to question it? I don't have data for any other exams.
Year = Passing score = Passing rate
2009 = 124 = 70%
2010 = 133 = 55%
2011 = 111 = 71%
2012 = 122 = 68%
does he mean by begin to question it, meaning begin to want to sue the BCPS ?
Keep your fingers cross guys !
This is the result week, check your emails everyday
I will be on vacation this week but I have work email setup on my phone so that I know what is the outcome as far pass/fail
Good to see u Janiceps, keep in touch
I m very excited
And yea
PM me for 2013 material and mock exam
I was told that results wouldn't be out til first week of December. so what do you mean about the results this week ?
Castle told me this coming weekI was told that results wouldn't be out til first week of December. so what do you mean about the results this week ?
Why would you call castle ? it is bcps that distributes scores. castle just gives the data to bcps. they are just testing center, nothing elseCastle told me this coming week
I called them
I'm assuming BPS still had to evaluate this data and make necessary adjustments. I'd be surprised if we got our scores any earlier than DecemberNormally, the results are released the first week of December. Maybe with the new computer testing it's faster. I wouldn't be surprised if castle is releasing the scores to bps this week, then we know in December.
Castle told me this coming week
I called them
did castle tell you that they are sure BPS will release the scores to the candidates ? Unless, castle told you that they know for sure BPS will send the scores to candidates to this week, it doesn't mean anything. cause castle doesn't send scores to candidates. bps does.
Ofcourse Bps released the score in the past but not anymore as castle has exclusive rights now as they have the access to the students data and also scores, you can read in the disclaimer it mentioned