- Joined
- Aug 18, 2015
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 14
Last edited:
Latino/Hispanic usually refers to Mexicans and Central, Latin, and often South Americans. Not Spaniards or Portuguese from mainland Europe.
Snip. (BTW, i absolutely hate that you're race affects your chances of being accepted)
Hispanic (of or relating to Spain) is a general term that includes many communities that are not under-represented in Medicine.Latino/Hispanic usually refers to Mexicans and Central, Latin, and often South Americans. Not Spaniards or Portuguese from mainland Europe.
@gyngyn could you clarify?
I was under the impression that Latino refers specifically to the people of central and south america, including Brazilians, who obviously do not speak Spanish (there are also some countries in SA where French is the main language). Hispanic I think refers to any person who is descended from the Spanish, whether they're from Spain or Central/South America. Therefore, I would think that OP is neither Latino nor Hispanic.
From my understanding:
Hispanic refers to someone who comes from a Spanish speaking country. Derived from Hispania which refers to España. So people from Spain are Hispanic.
Latino refers to the geographic region of Latin America and South America. So brazilians are Latino but not Hispanic.
Hispanic (of or relating to Spain) is a general term that includes many communities that are not under-represented in Medicine.
Though OP's community is not generally considered UIM, his self identification as "Hispanic" might be considered acceptable in its broadest definition.
(BTW, i absolutely hate that you're race affects your chances of being accepted)
So according to the US Census Bureau which adcoms use to verify race/ethnicity claims
I dislike this definition. So they're basically saying Spanish=Hispanic=Latino. Therefore, that definition excludes all of the people in South and Central America who speak Portuguese or French and claims that they are not Latino because they are not Spanish. BUT the definition of "Latin America" is, "A term applied to all of the Spanish- or Portuguese-speaking nations south of the United States." Therefore, Brazilians and other non-Spanish speakers who reside in these countries SHOULD be considered Latino. =/
do you now see that when you ask someone for special privileges to be given to a group that the dispenser of privilege sets definitions for the group? this only matters when you ask for extra "consideration"I dislike this definition. So they're basically saying Spanish=Hispanic=Latino. Therefore, that definition excludes all of the people in South and Central America who speak Portuguese or French and claims that they are not Latino because they are not Spanish. BUT the definition of "Latin America" is, "A term applied to all of the Spanish- or Portuguese-speaking nations south of the United States." Therefore, Brazilians and other non-Spanish speakers who reside in these countries SHOULD be considered Latino. =/
Soo hypothetically, if someone was Brazilian, assuming they are pretty much 100% Portuguese and have no indigenous or African roots, what are they supposed to put on AMCAS? Caucasian? That just does not make sense to me.
Probably just White. Whereas an Argentine with 100% Spanish and no indigenous/African routes will be considered White Hispanic.
Brazilian as in born and raised in Brazil? White Hispanic/Latino would make sense to me.Soo hypothetically, if someone was Brazilian, assuming they are pretty much 100% Portuguese and have no indigenous or African roots, what are they supposed to put on AMCAS? Caucasian? That just does not make sense to me.
Brazilian as in born and raised in Brazil? White Hispanic/Latino would make sense to me.
That's what doesn't make sense to me. If an Argentinian is getting a leg up by being able to say that they are Hispanic (they probably don't actually benefit, but I dunno anything about this) then a Brazilian should DEFINITELY get a leg up. Argentina is much more developed and prosperous than Brazil.
They aren't URM/UIM so there really isn't an added benefit/leg up. Spanish skills can be done by non-Hispanics as well and can significantly benefit the underserved Hispanic/Latino community.
Yeah I didn't think Argentinians were, but are Brazilians?
And yeah that's why I'm a Spanish major
Not according to the US Census Bureau (if you're asking URM/UIM, Brazilians are definitely ORM. Think Mexicans and some Latin Americans as URM/UIM Hispanics).
People who do not identify with one of the specific origins listed on the questionnaire but indicate that they are "another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin" are those whose origins are from Spain, the Spanish-speaking countries of Central or South America, or the Dominican Republic. The terms "Hispanic," "Latino," and "Spanish" are used interchangeably.
I know, the US Census Bureau definitions are inaccurate and outdated. Medical schools follow the definitions to the letter, so we're stuck with it no matter how senseless and wrong it seems. But I still maintain that White Hispanics and Whites really have insignificant differences besides some added language skills, which non-Hispanics can easily acquire and master.
If race bothered you so much, you could have declined to check the box.
I also have been surrounded in a primarily Hispanic/Latino environment throughout my childhood
This is like me saying that I have a German heritage but grew up in a asian neighborhood and environment, so I identify as Chinese...
The race and ethnicity tables from AMCAS are hard to interpret because they use self-identified data.Not according to the US Census Bureau (if you're asking URM/UIM, Brazilians are definitely ORM. Think Mexicans and some Latin Americans as URM/UIM Hispanics).
People who do not identify with one of the specific origins listed on the questionnaire but indicate that they are "another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin" are those whose origins are from Spain, the Spanish-speaking countries of Central or South America, or the Dominican Republic. The terms "Hispanic," "Latino," and "Spanish" are used interchangeably.
I know, the US Census Bureau definitions are inaccurate and outdated. Medical schools follow the definitions to the letter, so we're stuck with it no matter how senseless and wrong it seems. But I still maintain that White Hispanics and Whites really have insignificant differences besides some added language skills, which non-Hispanics can easily acquire and master.
The race and ethnicity tables from AMCAS are hard to interpret because they use self-identified data.
Lots of the folks in these tables are not being considered UIM by medical schools (just like OP).
This happens all the time.Well, I understand that my reasoning for identifying as Hispanic/Latino does not exactly fall under U.S. Census Bureau guidelines, but I have truly self-identified with this ethnicity throughout my life. That's just the bottom line for me. If I knew it would cause me this trouble, I would have put down Caucasian. I mean if an interviewer suspects that I have "violated" those guidelines on my application, will they notify the AAMC or other schools? Thanks for all the help guys.
Those numbers still matter. If you don't measure it, you can't see the trends. There are fewer AA doctors now than in the 70s in post-racial US. Those numbers matter. Hispanic numbers matter in order to gauge trends in healthcare with a changing demographic. If anything, I would prefer that they add more boxes in order to more accurately measure and consider populations. Wouldn't it make sense to be able to track Asian URM populations such as Hmong, to differentiate between white European and Middle Eastern? It need not be divisive. Of course, it should start with the US Census correcting their definitions and expanding their categories.What do you think of a suggestion to eliminate race/ethnicity self-identification from the application? Would it be unnecessary since all application systems include them by default?
Well, I understand that my reasoning for identifying as Hispanic/Latino does not exactly fall under U.S. Census Bureau guidelines, but I have truly self-identified with this ethnicity throughout my life. That's just the bottom line for me. If I knew it would cause me this trouble, I would have put down Caucasian. I mean if an interviewer suspects that I have "violated" those guidelines on my application, will they notify the AAMC or other schools? Thanks for all the help guys.
I don't think adcoms like it when you decline to check the box
Remove race/ethnicity classification all together? Or only the self-identification part? If the latter, how do you propose applicants proving their race/ethnicity?What do you think of a suggestion to eliminate race/ethnicity self-identification from the application?
Remove race/ethnicity classification all together? Or only the self-identification part? If the latter, how do you propose applicants proving their race/ethnicity?
To end this discussion. Born and raised in Brazil here, and on AMCAS I have:It would be unfortunate if someone who was Brazilian faced adverse consequences for claiming they were Hispanic/Latino, even though Brazil is not a majority Spanish-speaking country. The country's unique ethnic history makes them challenging to classify.
In the end, I would probably just nod and accept what they said, but Brazilians are not considered UIM, right? It should not affect admissions unless they were fluent in Portuguese and the med school served a Portuguese-speaking population.
I had almost no problems with this except for one school where the interviewer said my English was way too good and asked for proof of my Brazilian origins (wtf), but this was not related to how I identified myself on AMCAS. On top of it all I do look like a regular white dude, so it's really all about of how you identify yourself (just don't be European putting yourself as latino, haha)
Each school has the autonomy to identify and recruit any group as under-served (and thus UIM).In the end, I would probably just nod and accept what they said, but Brazilians are not considered UIM, right? It should not affect admissions unless they were fluent in Portuguese and the med school served a Portuguese-speaking population.
What did you say?My interviewer asked me what I thought of Donald Trump and border security.
Border security is necessary, but Trump is going at it the wrong way.What did you say?
To end this discussion. Born and raised in Brazil here, and on AMCAS I have:
"Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish origin
Other (Brazilian)"
I had almost no problems with this except for one school where the interviewer said my English was way too good and asked for proof of my Brazilian origins (wtf), but this was not related to how I identified myself on AMCAS. On top of it all I do look like a regular white dude, so it's really all about of how you identify yourself (just don't be European putting yourself as latino, haha)
That is weird that they asked you for proof. None of my interviewers asked me for proof of my ethnicity, and I'm Mexican of European descent. Maybe your interviewer doesn't know about Brazilian culture. Non Hispanics I meet usually don't believe me when I tell them I'm not white because they don't know that there's also people of European descent in the Hispanic culture.
If you are a Massachusetts resident, you are considered URM in that state. Unfortunately, if you are from a Portuguese speaking background and not from that state, you can't apply there unless via MD/Ph.D pathway.
http://www.umassmed.edu/som1/admissions/academic-programs/baccalaureate-md-pathway/