Can anyone recommend some laptops for pharmacy school???
Can anyone recommend some laptops for pharmacy school???
Can anyone recommend some laptops for pharmacy school???
MacBook all the way. You don't want your operating system freaking out on you once a month right before a big exam.
IMO Macs attract people who do not know much about computers. They see the shiny aluminum case and all of the nice on-screen effects and end up paying a ridiculous amount of money for mediocre hardware. Windows is not bad at all. If you know what you're doing you should not have any problems.MacBook all the way. You don't want your operating system freaking out on you once a month right before a big exam.
I have a toshiba laptop with amd dual core but I broke the clip that locks that screen when you close it. I can probably use that for now its sufficient enough but its heavy around 6+. Carrying it everyday will be a hassle. I wouldn't touch a mac the hardware they use is year old technology, only reason people say its good is because the software works perfectly with what the machine is capable of. I'm interested in the new intel i3, i5 or i7 processors any recommendations?Are you planning on doing any gaming with it?
MacBook all the way. You don't want your operating system freaking out on you once a month right before a big exam.
iPad
I'm sorry... that deserves this ...
iPad is a sorry excuse for a tablet. It's an oversized iPod.
And you won't see a difference between 2GB RAM vs 4GB RAM for these simple purposes. =
I am going to strongly disagree with you there. Hell I built the desktop I'm on, running just the basics of Win7 and its still using 1.71GB of ram. And remember a laptop, especially a prebuilt one, has a lot more crap running in the background.
If you're going Win7, you need 4GB of ram or higher.
As for Macs... macs are nice. They're really good for graphic design and if you're a snob. Really, its just as good to get a Windows PC. When people start spouting off "Well Macs never get any viruses and blah blah blah" there's two things to consider.
First, Macs possess a very very small subset of the computer population. So of course you're not going to see as many problems with viruses because there's not as many to infect.
Second, most people who run Windows do not have a decent virus software installed and/or running. Download avast for free and you're set.
Just beware of the fan boys lol
4 gigs on win7? 😱 Most people don't even have that much haha. To put that into perspective, only ~23% of the users on Steam have 4 gigs or more... those are people who would typically buy a lot of RAM in the first place."I went on UCSF's website and looked up the percentage of admitted students without a bachelor's degree. GEEZ I didn't know it was that low accepting of non-degree people."
Interesting observation. People make it sound like we receive HUNDREDS of applications from non-degree individuals and only admit one or two. In reality, we receive VERY FEW applications from students without a degree. So naturally, our admitted students will reflect this. Again, we select from those that apply.
But yea, Win7 is taking about ~1.1 gigs of RAM right now on my system. If you can afford it, just go with 4 gigs. I skimped on RAM with my thinkpad a couple years ago and ended up regretting it.
It's really not that uncommon, my laptop and desktop both have 8gigs in it. Gotta remember that not everyone is running Win7 or Vista. XP only uses about 250MB of Ram at one time, so having 1 gig of ram is not a big deal.
The kernal alone for Win7 takes up like half a gig. Firefox, when it's hungry, can take up 250MB or more, tack on maybe running iTunes or opening up Office (which is surprisingly memory hungry) and boom you've capped out your 2 GB of ram.
Luckily though virtually no manufacturer is shipping any laptops with anything less than 4GB
System RAM 2 GB
30.05%
Less than 512 MB
(+0.02%) 0.67%
512 Mb to 999 MB
(+0.11%) 4.18%
1 GB
(-0.10%) 11.62%
2 GB
(-0.89%) 30.05%
3 GB
(-0.99%) 29.00%
4 GB
(+1.47%) 16.51%
5 GB and higher
(+0.38%) 7.97
Yea that's why I regretted it. I bought my thinkpad 3-4 years ago in the days of XP.
Macs are so freaking over-rated and way too expensive. You are paying for a stupid white apple on your laptop and an operating system that barely anything works on. I love the 95% of my professors emails that say "This won't work on Macs."
Wow - I guess I have a super Mac. Never had a problem and everyone in academia has told me to stick with a Mac. Total compatibility, great processing power, excellent look, awesome battery power, user friendly, andaudio/visual is primo.
Idk where you are all looking, but the bigger more reputable the school, the more Mac friendly. Ivy league schools and Tier 1 schools live by Mac and some of the large State pharmacy schools I have interviewed at are also strong supporters of Mac.
In my opinion - there's a reason why America's top universities and businesses are choosing mac over pc.
Apple's share of the US computer market fell to 8 percent during the fourth calendar quarter of 2008 from 9.5 percent in the third
Apple does not rank amongst the top 5 PC vendors worldwide, and hence no data was reported for the company in the global demographic.
Wow - I guess I have a super Mac. Never had a problem and everyone in academia has told me to stick with a Mac. Total compatibility, great processing power, excellent look, awesome battery power, user friendly, andaudio/visual is primo.
Idk where you are all looking, but the bigger more reputable the school, the more Mac friendly. Ivy league schools and Tier 1 schools live by Mac and some of the large State pharmacy schools I have interviewed at are also strong supporters of Mac.
In my opinion - there's a reason why America's top universities and businesses are choosing mac over pc.
I highly disagree, Win7 is much less resource hoggy then Vista and Vista will run 2gb ram fine. The only thing that would require that much ram are newly sophisticated games which are pretty much the only thing pushing the specs on computers. My 1gb ram single core processor can handle 10+internet pages continually working, powerpoint, etc all at the same time. There's no darn need for 8gb quad core yada yada to do anything a normal person wants to do on the computer.I am going to strongly disagree with you there. Hell I built the desktop I'm on, running just the basics of Win7 and its still using 1.71GB of ram. And remember a laptop, especially a prebuilt one, has a lot more crap running in the background.
If you're going Win7, you need 4GB of ram or higher.
As for Macs... macs are nice. They're really good for graphic design and if you're a snob. Really, its just as good to get a Windows PC. When people start spouting off "Well Macs never get any viruses and blah blah blah" there's two things to consider.
First, Macs possess a very very small subset of the computer population. So of course you're not going to see as many problems with viruses because there's not as many to infect.
Second, most people who run Windows do not have a decent virus software installed and/or running. Download avast for free and you're set.
Just beware of the fan boys lol
I highly disagree, Win7 is much less resource hoggy then Vista and Vista will run 2gb ram fine. The only thing that would require that much ram are newly sophisticated games which are pretty much the only thing pushing the specs on computers. My 1gb ram single core processor can handle 10+internet pages continually working, powerpoint, etc all at the same time. There's no darn need for 8gb quad core yada yada to do anything a normal person wants to do on the computer.
If you're a student and just use your computer for web-browsing, studying, etc do yourself a favor and just buy a inexpensive computer. It will do anything you need it to, not to mention other peoples 'high-end' computers will be outdated with the newest computers and $500 cheaper 3 months down the line, since they seem to feel like it's more of a competition then sensible buying.
check this out people.. what do you think ?
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sony+-+...lack/9723951.p?id=1218159867078&skuId=9723951
You're payin about an extra $200 just because it says Sony on it
😕😕😕😕😕😕 What?? UC's aren't Mac biased. Harvard isn't Mac biased. MIT isn't Mac biased. UPenn isn't Mac biased. Wall street isn't Mac biased. Biotech/Biopharmaceuticals aren't Mac biased.... The only industry that's even remotely Mac biased is the creative industry and many of the upper end uses don't even use Mac or PC -_-
From an Apple biased site ... January 14, 2009 http://www.appleinsider.com/article...us_pc_market_slips_to_8_at_hands_of_acer.html And this was when Vista was screwing up the whole PC market ...
There is perception and then there is reality. I don't really care if people choose Mac or PC but saying things that aren't true makes me 😡 Since Apple switched over to Intel, it hasn't really mattered all that much if you're on a Mac or PC ... the only real difference is pricing point and image (something college-age kids care about).
then what kind of laptop can you recommend with i5 processor, NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M GPU, and weighs around 5 pounds
I have seen first hand the prevalence of Mac at ALL the UC campuses - some having entire Mac labs (UC-Berkley in partic). NYU is ridiculously Mac'd out - seen it as well. While graphic arts and TV/Film definitely rely on Mac's, the popularity of the Mac OS extends way beyond that because of how user friendly and reliable Macs are.
Wall street is Mac based - check out their stocks over the past few quarters 😀
Ultimately - its a total preference. Many companies will use PC's because they are cheaper. Many companies, however, do not. The physician group I see consists of 20 doctors, and 15 NPs - the entire facility is run by Macs.
Its a great product and to answer the original thread prompt - you should definitely get one for pharmacy school because it makes a great personal computer. It is very user friendly, it has nice programs for organizing/editing pictures, and it integrates many programs together in a very clean, organized format.
I have seen first hand the prevalence of Mac at ALL the UC campuses - some having entire Mac labs (UC-Berkley in partic). NYU is ridiculously Mac'd out - seen it as well. While graphic arts and TV/Film definitely rely on Mac's, the popularity of the Mac OS extends way beyond that because of how user friendly and reliable Macs are.
Wall street is Mac based - check out their stocks over the past few quarters 😀
Ultimately - its a total preference. Many companies will use PC's because they are cheaper. Many companies, however, do not. The physician group I see consists of 20 doctors, and 15 NPs - the entire facility is run by Macs.
Its a great product and to answer the original thread prompt - you should definitely get one for pharmacy school because it makes a great personal computer. It is very user friendly, it has nice programs for organizing/editing pictures, and it integrates many programs together in a very clean, organized format.
And the whole "While graphic arts and TV/Film definitely rely on Mac's..." is just a myth. In reality the creative industry is not heavily dependent on using Macs vs using PCs.