California law being too picky?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

aznkukuboi

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
A8jUIXk.png


This is a violation.

Who in their right minds would have noticed this on a day to day basis? Hats off to you if you do every and all the time! I think the ones who printed this should be getting the fine, not us.
 
Yeah why should pharmacy get fine rather than the provider who uses these.
Ending up at our hands to create a barrier to patient care
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I actually would but I agree that prescribers and security printers should get fined.
Or, or....

NOTICE

If California DOJ authorized only one or two types of forms (one Rx per pad and/or the multi-Rx pad) it would make life a lot easier. It is annoying to explain to ******ed office managers or MAs why security printer ID and preprinted DEA and address are requirements