Yeah MacGyver! I see you have it all figured out. So why don't some of the newly minted med school graduates get a job as a PA or a nurse, if they won't do a residency? You are discussing irrelevant, theoretical, hypothetical utopia. Your training as a physician does not stop with graduation from the med school. So you probably would be overqualified in your basic training, but grossly underqualified in your practical skills. Even with year 3 and 4 of clinical rotations under the belt. PA education is structured in such way, that for the most part, one doesn't need a postgraduate training. MD/DO are expected to do residency to be a full-fledged docs. It just comes with a territory of being a physician vs non-physician provider. BTW I'm not a PA, so some of you in the know please correct me if I'm wrong.
Its just not worth arguing with McGyver. I will submit this post by another med student who has actually been a PA. The original post was discussing a bridge from PA to MD. It is equally appropriate here:
"I have weighed in on this subject many times. As a LONG time ER PA now in med school I feel I have a unique perspective ---even if others without the experiences of either disagree.
I am against any bridge that would grant medical science credit. The material is presented differently in med school and from a different perspective. There is in fact deeper understanding of material--mostly due to the extra time allowed to learn.
I would support advanced credit to skip physical diagnosis/exam H&P, ethics and all that crap.
BUT--if anyone thinks the clinical aspect of the education is the same--they are simply wrong. Minimally--they are identical with the slight edge to the PA programs.
Medical school is designed to create a doctorate level acedemic in the field of medicine. Residency creates the clinician.
PA school is DESIGNED to create a clincian.
PA grads are simply better prepared (for the immediate) in a clinical setting. The education, examinations, boards and overriding philosophy is clinical medicine.
This quickly reverses itself when comparing a new grad PA with a post residency physician. There is simply no comparison then."
For what its worth there was a PA test given by the state of Florida in the 1990s for FMGs. From what I remember none of the applicants could pass the test and the costs of the lawsuits from those who couldn't pass the test ran well over $1 million. There is a very large FMG community in Florida who tries this pretty much every year. One natural consequence of allowing med school graduates to practice as PAs would be to allow the several hundred thousand FMGs to practice as PAs. I'm sure McGyver is in full support of this.
There are still a few FMGs practicing in Florida with temporary licenses after 6-7 years. The BOP also uses FMGs as PAs. Nice company I guess.
For what its worth there is an AAPA position paper on this. One of the salient points is that part of PA training is in the role of the PA and how to work under the supervision of a physician. I do not have much experience in working with medical students, but I do not think that there training encompasses this role.
Here is the AAPA paper:
http://www.aapa.org/policy/unlicensed-med-grads.html
David Carpenter, PA-C