- Joined
- Oct 1, 2002
- Messages
- 5,633
- Reaction score
- 20
Case #25 (12-28-2004)
47 yo man referred in 1997 for evaluation of iris lesion OS.
47 yo man referred in 1997 for evaluation of iris lesion OS.
aphistis said:That's a really well-presented case, especially with the video. I do have a couple, undoubtedly dumb layman questions about the treatment.
I noticed in the citations the 5-year survival rate for uveal melanoma is dramatically higher than elsewhere in the body (particularly, for example, mucosal melanoma in the oral cavity, in which the treatment is often as disfiguring as the disease). Along those same lines, the excision was pretty conservative. Are there any known explanations for why the neoplasm is so much less aggressive in the eye than elsewhere?
Second, after a surgical procedure like the one shown, what is the prognosis for vision in the affected eye? Is it most likely to be fully functional, partly, or not at all?
Andrew_Doan said:The vision in the surgical eye is 20/20! The surgeons did an awesome job.
The risk of spread is less if the tumor is still confined within the sclera. This is why surgical technique is so important. With surgery, there's always the risk of letting the melanoma out of the eye. I think because the tumors are restrained to the eye because of the sclera and the eye-blood barrier.
I removed an eye today because of a large choroidal melanoma. During the surgery, we took extra precautions to prevent inadvertant perforation of the globe, which could potentially release tumor cells into the orbit.
JennyW said:Dr. Doan,
How often do patients like this need pupiloplasty or other sorts of iris "reconstructive" surgeries?
Jenny
PBEA said:Colored contact lens is an option, if symptomatic, and of course far less invasive.
I currently follow a 35yo woman with similiar case (50% of iris removed). At three years out developed unilateral (surgical eye) increase in IOP. Gonio revealed open angle 360. Presumably scarring has affected TB meshwork. What are any thoughts on SLT, etc versus topical meds.
Andrew_Doan said:In your case with increased IOP, I'd be concerned, as you pointed out, that scarring of the TM is affecting aqueous outflow; thus, SLT/ALT and prostaglandin analogs may not be the best treatment options to reduce IOP. I would try selective aqueous suppressants first (beta-blockers/CAI/alpha-agonists).
Andrew_Doan said:We have used contact lenses in patients with large/irregular pupils, and they work well. This is definitely a good option for patients who can tolerate contact lenses.
In your case with increased IOP, I'd be concerned, as you pointed out, that scarring of the TM is affecting aqueous outflow; thus, SLT/ALT and prostaglandin analogs may not be the best treatment options to reduce IOP. I would try selective aqueous suppressants first (beta-blockers/CAI/alpha-agonists).
mdkurt said:That's a remarkable video. My hat is off to Dr. Wallace, particularly for doing nearly the whole surgery with one lousy #75 blade! As far as treatment of elevated IOP when the TM is compromised, prostaglandin analogs should work just fine. There's at least one study that I know of showing that they're effective in chronic angle closure.
PBEA said:Interesting, I tend to disagree with your statement about prostaglandin analogs. I'm too lazy to find your article, but I wonder how do you (or they)account for the mechanism of action. If the TM has reduced function, whether by blockage or scarring, then I would expect episcleral venous flow would be reduced. This would'nt be one of those corporate affiliated research papers, would it?