Chemistry Stoichiometry

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

karebear0684

New Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Never in undergrad was I ever expected to memorize molecular weights. This is biting me in the butt now, the only ones I know from memory are very basic, like H, C, O and N. There are lots of stoichiometry questions in the Kaplan book that I can set up fine, and could calculate fine if I knew molecular weights. Does anyone have any advice on which molecular weights are the most worth my time?
 
Never in undergrad was I ever expected to memorize molecular weights. This is biting me in the butt now, the only ones I know from memory are very basic, like H, C, O and N. There are lots of stoichiometry questions in the Kaplan book that I can set up fine, and could calculate fine if I knew molecular weights. Does anyone have any advice on which molecular weights are the most worth my time?

I'm pretty sure they give you those.
 
Do they?

Oh god I've been memorizing them. Just a general rule of thumb, masses go up by ~1-2 AMU across the table, and in their families, they multiply by ~x2-2.5 going down.
 
Never in undergrad was I ever expected to memorize molecular weights. This is biting me in the butt now, the only ones I know from memory are very basic, like H, C, O and N. There are lots of stoichiometry questions in the Kaplan book that I can set up fine, and could calculate fine if I knew molecular weights. Does anyone have any advice on which molecular weights are the most worth my time?

H-1, C-12, O-16, N-14, F-19, Na-23, Ca-40, Cl-35.5, P-31, S-32, U-238...

That's the only list of masses that I would be able to tell you from memory.

They should give you masses for anything other than those.
 
Top Bottom