Clarification for Secondary length Restrictions

[BoneBroCO]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

When a secondary gives you some character or word restriction, should I try to create a response that gets very close to this limit? If not, when is too little? Currently answering a question with a 2000 character limit, but I feel like I have adequately answered the prompt in a little over 1000. I don't want to fill it with fluff to reach a higher count.

Any insight on this? @Goro @LizzyM @gonnif @Med Ed @gyngyn @Moko

 

[eartharte]

Fluff is never good. If you feel like you've explained everything you need to, then don't fill it with empty words just to meet the maximum.

 

[Goro]

When a secondary gives you some character or word restriction, should I try to create a response that gets very close to this limit? If not, when is too little? Currently answering a question with a 2000 character limit, but I feel like I have adequately answered the prompt in a little over 1000. I don't want to fill it with fluff to reach a higher count.

Any insight on this? @Goro @LizzyM @gonnif @Med Ed @gyngyn @Moko

Just answer the question

 

[Med Ed]

When a secondary gives you some character or word restriction, should I try to create a response that gets very close to this limit? If not, when is too little? Currently answering a question with a 2000 character limit, but I feel like I have adequately answered the prompt in a little over 1000. I don't want to fill it with fluff to reach a higher count.

Any insight on this? @Goro @LizzyM @gonnif @Med Ed @gyngyn @Moko

I'll echo the above sentiments. Reading applications is a time-consuming process, and no points are awarded for taking 2,000 characters to do the job of 1,000.

 

[LizzyM]

If you have only 20% of the maximum allowed, then it might be too short.... otherwise, don't sweat it.