- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 701
- Reaction score
- 0
Internet was out almost all day while I was on campus. 😡
In my Dinosaur class I was getting pissed off about not having internet and learning about evolution for the 9803476th time (I'm even taking a 3000 level Bio class on Evo this semester) so I decided I was hungry and I left mid-class to eat lunch.
I realized there was no internet in the Union, either, so after eating I went back to class out of sheer boredom.
In summary, I left class, ate lunch, and came back.
wtf is 3000 level?

really? that's kind of how i feel too, except that everyone on SDN seems to think that reneging on a letter of intent is the most unethical thing in the world. so that's caused me to rethink.
plus, i have a two-way tie for dream school. mostly because i can't decide which city i want to be in.
well, nyc>>boston. problem solved! 😉
is it? i'm with metallica here-- what are the odds that they both take me? (and, let's get real here... what are the odds that either one takes me?) i think there's like a 99.99% chance that i'll go to whichever one takes me... so am i willing to risk "lying" if that 0.01% chance presents itself? this is the question.
some moral purists would say that the simple possibility of getting into both (regardless of the actual odds) should preclude you from sending an explicit LOI to both schools. however, after months of having my emotional core torn asunder by these adcoms, i couldn't care less. neither should you.
that being said, can you imagine a situation where a strongly worded letter lacking an explicit declaration of intention would lead to a different situation from an overt LOI? i don't want to believe that it is possible.
i'd stick with the strongly worded stuff personally. statements like "i can't imagine a better place to continue my education" doesn't necessarily exclude the possibility that the other school is exactly as good a place. you seem to genuinely feel that they are on equal terms, so it wouldn't be immoral either!