Class of 2014!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BU Medical Sciences
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
metallica81788 said:
If you pay the bill off in full every month, you don't pay interest. So if you have $400 balance and your minimum payment is $20, you'll pay interest if you pay anything less than $400 but you still need to pay at least $20.
Click to expand...

ahhh....i see, i get it now. i need to start using a credit card, build up some credit.
 
dingyibvs said:
man, Case's scholarship policies are so asinine. they don't re-award the scholarships from ppl who withdraw, like whoTF does that?
Click to expand...

That's fricked up.

dingyibvs said:
ahhh....i see, i get it now. i need to start using a credit card, build up some credit.
Click to expand...

That's why I did it. I don't get any cool rewards or anything on my card, though. 👎
 
dingyibvs said:
👍




Yea true, I'm def thinking it over. I've never had a credit card before, so is it fine if I wait a few months to start paying? Or pay in installments?
Click to expand...

ahh i just realized i was typing this too you need to pay a minimum payment every month like $5 or so but if you dont wanna pay interest just pay everything ontime every month 🙂
 
you guys hear about the new NCAA football rule


"Currently, players who are penalized for taunting on their way to the end zone draw a 15-yard penalty on the extra point attempt, 2-point conversion attempt or the ensuing kickoff. Beginning in 2011, live-ball penalties will be assessed from the spot of the foul and eliminate the score. Examples include players finishing touchdown runs by high-stepping into the end zone or pointing the ball toward an opponent.
Celebration penalties following a score will continue to be assessed on conversion attempts or the ensuing kickoff."
 
brooklynblunder said:
you guys hear about the new NCAA football rule


"Currently, players who are penalized for taunting on their way to the end zone draw a 15-yard penalty on the extra point attempt, 2-point conversion attempt or the ensuing kickoff. Beginning in 2011, live-ball penalties will be assessed from the spot of the foul and eliminate the score. Examples include players finishing touchdown runs by high-stepping into the end zone or pointing the ball toward an opponent.
Celebration penalties following a score will continue to be assessed on conversion attempts or the ensuing kickoff."
Click to expand...
i wish the ncaa would get a hobby and let the kids have some fun.
 
brooklynblunder said:
you guys hear about the new NCAA football rule


"Currently, players who are penalized for taunting on their way to the end zone draw a 15-yard penalty on the extra point attempt, 2-point conversion attempt or the ensuing kickoff. Beginning in 2011, live-ball penalties will be assessed from the spot of the foul and eliminate the score. Examples include players finishing touchdown runs by high-stepping into the end zone or pointing the ball toward an opponent.
Celebration penalties following a score will continue to be assessed on conversion attempts or the ensuing kickoff."
Click to expand...

yea, JJ actually likes it. i really hate that ****, that's like an anti-U policy
 
Yeah, I think my post boards trip will be Spain, Barcelona, Granada, maybe Ibiza? I definitely did the pre med school europe trip too, it was pretty epic.
 
brooklynblunder said:
you guys hear about the new NCAA football rule


"Currently, players who are penalized for taunting on their way to the end zone draw a 15-yard penalty on the extra point attempt, 2-point conversion attempt or the ensuing kickoff. Beginning in 2011, live-ball penalties will be assessed from the spot of the foul and eliminate the score. Examples include players finishing touchdown runs by high-stepping into the end zone or pointing the ball toward an opponent.
Celebration penalties following a score will continue to be assessed on conversion attempts or the ensuing kickoff."
Click to expand...

That is so dumb.

You shouldn't be U-ing all over the place, but just let them play.
 
drizzt3117 said:
Yeah, I think my post boards trip will be Spain, Barcelona, Granada, maybe Ibiza? I definitely did the pre med school europe trip too, it was pretty epic.
Click to expand...

How much does this European trip cost anyways?
 
BlueElmo said:
How much does this European trip cost anyways?
Click to expand...

Well, my pre-med school one was kinda pricey, but I used my airline miles from interviews to cover the airfare, so that was nice. I've pretty much built up enough miles from conference travel to cover the airfare for this trip but the time in Europe will be out of my pocket but whatever! I just finished my last q-bank block of the night about 10 minutes ago 😛 Trust me, I deserve it, haha.
 
msb1190 said:
someone posted this a while back. initally, i see her moving clockwise, but after a while i can switch it and see it both ways.
Click to expand...

that's cause she flips her direction occasionally lol, you can tell if you focus on the plant foot, it's the right foot when she's turning anticlockwise and left foot when she's turning clockwise.

Try this:

http://www.randominc.net/spinninglady/
 
umm after reading the explanation, maybe it's not a hoax, i've seen it both ways but mostly anticlockwise.
 
Are you guys going to Europe before med schools start?
 
so it depends on whether you perceive the lifted leg as in front or behind the standing leg.

Try this, use both sammich's link and mine. Focus on the anticlockwise pic on my link for 30 seconds, then look at sammich's link. Then focus on the clockwise pic on my link for 30 seconds, then look at sammich's link again.
 
dingyibvs said:
that's cause she flips her direction occasionally lol, you can tell if you focus on the plant foot, it's the right foot when she's turning anticlockwise and left foot when she's turning clockwise.

Try this:

http://www.randominc.net/spinninglady/
Click to expand...
I can seeeee it!

Huzzah.

Every once in awhile, I can see both of them going in different directions which is trippy.
 
actually, i've found that it's better to look at both pics in my link at the same time, but focus briefly on the direction you'd like to see before switching to sammich's link. i see the direction i wanna see every time that way.
 
dingyibvs said:
so it depends on whether you perceive the lifted leg as in front or behind the standing leg.

Try this, use both sammich's link and mine. Focus on the anticlockwise pic on my link for 30 seconds, then look at sammich's link. Then focus on the clockwise pic on my link for 30 seconds, then look at sammich's link again.
Click to expand...
It's definitely handy to use the 'standing on left leg or right leg' trick for me
 
now i can just look away for a few seconds, imagine the dancer turning in the direction i want, then turn back and see the direction i want 😀 i can't get her to change directions voluntarily if i keep staring at her tho.
 
err, now i'm seeing her switching directions all the time, and can't focus on one direction. this thing is screwing with my mind ~_~
 
i get a feeling that blue's talking, but i can't see his posts, weird 😛
 
idk if this is a joke or a true story, but i liked this:

A Charlotte, NC, lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against fire among other things. Within a month having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed claim against the insurance company. In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost "in a series of small fires." The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason: That the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion.


The lawyer sued...and won! In delivering the ruling the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The Judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable fire, and was obligated to pay the claim. Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the rare cigars lost in the "fires."


NOW FOR THE BEST PART... After the lawyer cashed the check, the Insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!!! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.
 
dingyibvs said:
idk if this is a joke or a true story, but i liked this:

A Charlotte, NC, lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against fire among other things. Within a month having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed claim against the insurance company. In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost "in a series of small fires." The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason: That the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion.


The lawyer sued...and won! In delivering the ruling the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The Judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable fire, and was obligated to pay the claim. Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the rare cigars lost in the "fires."


NOW FOR THE BEST PART... After the lawyer cashed the check, the Insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!!! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.
Click to expand...


thats pretty bossy,
 
dingyibvs said:
idk if this is a joke or a true story, but i liked this:

A Charlotte, NC, lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against fire among other things. Within a month having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed claim against the insurance company. In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost "in a series of small fires." The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason: That the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion.


The lawyer sued...and won! In delivering the ruling the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The Judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable fire, and was obligated to pay the claim. Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the rare cigars lost in the "fires."


NOW FOR THE BEST PART... After the lawyer cashed the check, the Insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!!! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.
Click to expand...


thats pretty bossy, he wanted to have his cake and eat it too lol
 
my wings pulled out a huge victory today, things are looking good
 
3923_816b.jpeg


So

Cute
 
brooklynblunder said:
you guys hear about the new NCAA football rule


"Currently, players who are penalized for taunting on their way to the end zone draw a 15-yard penalty on the extra point attempt, 2-point conversion attempt or the ensuing kickoff. Beginning in 2011, live-ball penalties will be assessed from the spot of the foul and eliminate the score. Examples include players finishing touchdown runs by high-stepping into the end zone or pointing the ball toward an opponent.
Celebration penalties following a score will continue to be assessed on conversion attempts or the ensuing kickoff."
Click to expand...

👍
 
dingyibvs said:
does hockey go by the 2-2-1-1-1 format?



you should get a pet bunny for med school
Click to expand...

I believe it is 2-2-1-1-1, at least for the first round anyways. I hope the wings do great this year though. It would be awesome to have a rubber series with the penguins in the stanley cup finals. Anwyays, i'm out for the night, peace!!!!!!11111
 
NFL = no fun league or not for long

NCAA= NO CELEBRATIONS AT ALL!!!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

hommefatale
Elective Class Pass/Fail
Replies
3
Views
527
Goro
Goro
L
pass/no pass physical education class
Replies
4
Views
285
LizzyM
LizzyM
H
Not taking planned calculus class anymore
Replies
2
Views
552
holajola
H
aprilandaflower
Course classification of design courses
Replies
1
Views
323
wysdoc
wysdoc
A
Marking an audited class as a repeat?
Replies
1
Views
312
Mr.Smile12
Mr.Smile12
Top