closed vs open systems

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

dat_student

Junior Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Weyburn Terrace :-)
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I don't understand this Kaplan's argument:

test #2, q 54

Kaplan says:
1) "...a closed thermal system is impermeable to the exchange of matter. Thus, it can only exchange energy but not matter with its surrounding.."
2) "... A system that can exchange both energy and matter with its surrounding is known as open system ..."

Doesn't the second statement contradict the 1st statement?
 
nope! how does the 2nd statement contradict the 1st? key word is "closed thermal."
 
gatszu said:
nope! how does the 2nd statement contradict the 1st? key word is "closed thermal."

I felt "closed X" means "X" is not exchanged with the surrounding (i.e. X is conserved).

Based on #1, "closed thermal" implies that the only thing that's not closed (conserved) is thermal.
 
isolated - no exchange of matter or energy
closed - no exchange of matter
open - free exchange of matter and energy
 
Does anyone else here get confused by work done on a system or work done by a system? And what is the best way to memorize the signs of each? The equation (I think) is,

E = q + w

When is w pos or neg? When heat is added to the system, q is pos, and when heat is released into the surroundings, q is neg - right? But what about sign changes for w? And does anyone know any way to memorize this?
 
Top Bottom