basophilic

Full Member
5+ Year Member
May 30, 2015
404
83
What's the difference between Festinger's cognitive dissonance theory and Rogers' incongruity principle? At the core they sound very similar. Is incongruity more relevant to a general view of the self whereas CD more to a specific task?
 

mcatjelly

Meow
7+ Year Member
Dec 21, 2013
1,828
1,812
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
Mmm... I would say that the main difference between the two is that the ideal self in incongruity is determined by those around you, and the ideal self in cognitive dissonance is determined by you. Because according to Roger, incongruence arises when the love and respect you receive is conditional on you meeting the expectations of others. If you're receiving unconditional positive regard, you won't have incongruence.
 

basophilic

Full Member
5+ Year Member
May 30, 2015
404
83
Ah, right; and conditional positive regard from parents and conditions of worth (in self-regard) lead to incongruity according to Rogers
and on a sidenote, things like self-serving bias, actor-observer bias, fundamental attribution error, just-world phenomenon and other attributional biases are meant (despite being bad in themselves) to keep you from going too much into cognitive dissonance
 
This thread is more than 6 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.