COMSAE 105 - 475 - exam in two weeks

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted986199
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

deleted986199

Our school requires us to take the COMSAE 105d 10-15 days before our test date.
I got a 475. I'm not sure how I feel about this. This def. underestimated what I was expecting since I did significantly better on the combank and comquest assessments. Since the new comsaes are part of the new NBOME blueprint and I couldn't find much online, can someone please tell me what this means?
Did I get under scored?
Am I screwed?

Members don't see this ad.
 
It means no one knows what the new COMSAE's translate to. Based on the class data from my school they likely under predict, however we won't know by how much until we get scores back in a few weeks.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
my classes average for the 105 was a ~420. I got a 402. Lots of my friends who took it got in the high 300s. It sucked.

BUT, the 105 was optional for us. I hope it underpredicts, but after taking the real thing i feel the 105 emulates the pain and suffering that the COMLEX causes.
 
My class avg was 498 and I think I got a 468. As long as it doesn't overpredict by more than 68 points, I don't really have an opinion on it.
 
I think I got a 578 on 105 and thought it was similar to COMLEX but with stems that were 5-10x as long (no joke).

You're not screwed, but that score does indicate that either
-you have material gaps
-you haven't figured out how NBOME asks questions

Chances are that it's the latter because we all know how many favors the NBOME does us. Do another NBOME and screenshot anything you have trouble with and talk it through with a friend after, approaching every question asking
-what topic is being tested?
-what is an important feature of this topic that they're most likely asking me about? ***This one was SUPER useful on COMLEX for me with their vague crappy questions. It works like this:

Let's say you've got a question with a histology slide showing some pink stuff in the middle that you can't identify and they're asking you about what neurologic deficit is likely.
271702


Your options are something like:
a) peripheral neuropathy
b) monocular vision loss
c) hemibalismus
d) *A weird word only found in a midieval dictionary*
e) Another word you've never heard of
f) L5 flexed, SBrRl

You think oh **** I have no idea what this pink stuff is and I have no idea how a kidney pathology could lead to neurologic deficits. Don't guess! Take a deep breath. Ask yourself: What kidney diseases have pathogmonic histology findings that the NBOME thinks I should know. List them in your head, but if you're really struggling try to write them down. Then from that list think through which ones could have this weird third order effect. Now that you've got a few options go back to the histology and if you can't figure it out guess the highest yield option and if you're totally shooting in the dark pick the option that you think everyone else is most likely to choose, so at least that question is likely to score you the same as your peers and not hurt/help you too much.

Going through that kind of thought process would lead you to think "oh hey! Kimmel-Wilsen nodules are a histology finding that's high yield and important... diabetes has peripheral neuropathy!" Too easy.

COMLEX was really big on identifying "Oh, they're testing me on Q and asking me about how Z changes" and then saying "some really high yield aspects to Q are W,X,Y" and then making that connection to the most likely thing that they're focusing on, because sometimes with their question writing style you never really know.

I hope that helps, studying for COMLEX was rough. Keep the end in sight and just know that you got this & everyone thinks this is a really hard and bizarre exam. You're definitely not alone 👍
 
Last edited:
Top