- Joined
- Nov 26, 2013
- Messages
- 1,352
- Reaction score
- 193
So FC explains conduction aphasia as below:
"Conduction aphasia damage to arcuate fasciculus (connection between Wernicke’s and Broca’s area) results in patient’s inability to repeat words but an intact ability to comprehend with fluent speech"
So I get that fluency and comprehension are intact since both Wernicke's and Broca's are fine.
However, how do you explain the inability to repeat words? Why does damage in arcuate fasciculu impairs one's ability to repeat words?
Also, why particular phrases such as "No ifs, ands, or buts?"
"Conduction aphasia damage to arcuate fasciculus (connection between Wernicke’s and Broca’s area) results in patient’s inability to repeat words but an intact ability to comprehend with fluent speech"
So I get that fluency and comprehension are intact since both Wernicke's and Broca's are fine.
However, how do you explain the inability to repeat words? Why does damage in arcuate fasciculu impairs one's ability to repeat words?
Also, why particular phrases such as "No ifs, ands, or buts?"