Confusion of atomic mass vs atomic weight from book

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

betterfuture

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Please can someone explain to me the difference between atomic mass vs. Atomic weight. My Kaplan review says something while my chemistry book says another thing. I thought atomic mass is approximate to mass number(total # of neutrons and protons) while atomic weight was weighted average of isotopes.
 
You're right - you get the idea. The two terms are often used interchangeably when we're not talking about nuclear processes because for most purposes, they are not different by any significant amount and we will usually be working with an isotopic mix anyway. The only time you should be careful with this is when you look at mass spectra and see peaks off by a couple units.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad