I am a soon to be newbie attending (188 more days to go, but who is counting) and am starting to evaluate job offers. Looking for my "first grown up job". I have an offer from smaller group and a larger group in my area. There are definate advantages/disadvantages to each.
I am very familiar with the small group as it is where I trained, but downside is it is where I trained and I may always be considered a resident. Average pay, no room for advancement, small group, 2 years to partnership with no buy-in. Partnership means only meager increase in salary.
The larger group offer has LOW starting salary year 1 with progressive increases to year 5. They have a crazy bonus structure that appears very lucrative and will help far surpass the pay of the smaller group if all pans out. There is also an option of buy-in for shareholder at year 2 and year 5. This would allow me to spread my wings a bit and get out from under the residency umbrella.
Crunching numbers and assuming bonuses: If everything pans out the way the interviews said, I would make equal total money by year 3 or 4 at either job. Calls/Vacations are similar.
I guess that I am just looking for advice. Both groups seem to retain employees. Location is much better for one job. I have personal issues with evaluating a job assuming the bonuses to be income, b/c they are not definate pay. Is there a possible benefit for working for the group without buying in, or would it be better to be a shareholder. Lots of questions and they are all starting to make my head hurt.
Any advice from some of you whom have experienced and lived this all before would be much appreciated.
Zie
I am very familiar with the small group as it is where I trained, but downside is it is where I trained and I may always be considered a resident. Average pay, no room for advancement, small group, 2 years to partnership with no buy-in. Partnership means only meager increase in salary.
The larger group offer has LOW starting salary year 1 with progressive increases to year 5. They have a crazy bonus structure that appears very lucrative and will help far surpass the pay of the smaller group if all pans out. There is also an option of buy-in for shareholder at year 2 and year 5. This would allow me to spread my wings a bit and get out from under the residency umbrella.
Crunching numbers and assuming bonuses: If everything pans out the way the interviews said, I would make equal total money by year 3 or 4 at either job. Calls/Vacations are similar.
I guess that I am just looking for advice. Both groups seem to retain employees. Location is much better for one job. I have personal issues with evaluating a job assuming the bonuses to be income, b/c they are not definate pay. Is there a possible benefit for working for the group without buying in, or would it be better to be a shareholder. Lots of questions and they are all starting to make my head hurt.
Any advice from some of you whom have experienced and lived this all before would be much appreciated.
Zie