cube counting

Started by yumi43
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

yumi43

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
hi everyone!

i was wondering what the best method is for the cube counting section? i've been using the kaplan method where you count the total number of cubes, then make a list of 0-5 (for # of painted sides), tally all the cubes according to painted sides, and make sure the tallies add up to the total number of cubes. i know this is a foolproof method, but it takes too long. i think in the actual DAT you may get only 2 questions per cube stack. how do you all do it? thanks!
 
I tried the majority of the methods listed here on SDN and this is what works best for me.
- Look at the figure for a couple seconds to scope it out and make note of hard to spot cubes so i dont forget to count them
- Then I go through all of the cubes on the first level listing the number of exposed sides rather than putting a tally mark in the right box.
- I do the same for the rest of the levels but I separate them all like this:

1) 1 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 1
2) 3 4 1 5 1 2
3) 5 5

This works well for me because I don't have to look down to make sure im putting the tally mark in the right box. I find that the more you keep your eyes on the figure when counting the less prone you are to ****ing up. Every glance you take at your board to write something down is a chance at losing your count or screwing up. If you're feeling extra cautious do a quick count of the # of cubes per lvl as you count them and make sure they match up to what you've counted.
 
hi everyone!

i was wondering what the best method is for the cube counting section? i've been using the kaplan method where you count the total number of cubes, then make a list of 0-5 (for # of painted sides), tally all the cubes according to painted sides, and make sure the tallies add up to the total number of cubes. i know this is a foolproof method, but it takes too long. i think in the actual DAT you may get only 2 questions per cube stack. how do you all do it? thanks!

Work quickly.

I also don't count up the total # of cubes so that saves a little time. I have a method of moving front to back right to left from column to column and I don't end up missing cubes or counting extras b/c I just stick to that method everytime. You've got to find what works for you.

It still does take awhile but to me it's worth it because that's a section where I shouldn't miss one question.
 
The method that I use is fool proof. I haven't gotten one wrong since I started using it, and managed to pull a 25 on the PAT on the DAT. The piles of cubes have different levels, with various numbers of cubes. Could be two high, could be 6. I start at the bottom level, and write down the number of exposed sides for each cube, but I write it down showing the actual shape of the object from the top, so that I can know I didn't miss a cube. For example, level one will show:

4
22
3234

and level two will be

33
3

etc.

Try it a few times, and you will see that it works.

-Supertank
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Work quickly.

I also don't count up the total # of cubes so that saves a little time. I have a method of moving front to back right to left from column to column and I don't end up missing cubes or counting extras b/c I just stick to that method everytime. You've got to find what works for you.

It still does take awhile but to me it's worth it because that's a section where I shouldn't miss one question.

This is what I do too...I tried counting the total number of cubes then making a table and doing tally marks, but that took forever, and I usually need to make up time on cubes so that I have enough left over for pattern folding and re-checking marked problems. IMO, with that Kaplan method you end up wasting more time on each figure than necessary, since there are usually only 2-3 questions each.
 
Another method you can use is the one I use. It seems effective for me. I count the cubes base on levels, and write the number of sides painted. So if an object has 2 cubes on the third "floor", 3 on the second, and 4 on the third. It would look something like this.

5
4
----
3
3
2
----
2
1
2
2

again the numbers just represent the number of sides painted for that cube. It works well for me.