Current Recommendations for Hyperventilation for Increased ICP??

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drlee

Senior Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2002
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
My oral boards are coming up right around the corner in April. I've been reading about the latest recommendations for not inducing hyperventiilation for increased intracranial pressure in intracranial hypertension (Board Stiff Three). Hyperventilation would consequently result in cerebral ischemia. However, according to some textbooks I've read, hyperventilation is still considered an accepted mode of treating increased ICP.
If asked whether I would hyperventilate the patient during my oral boards, I'm not quite sure how to respond. Would you hyperventilate the patient at all (PaCO 30-35 mmHg)? Or would you maintain normocarbia but on the lower side of normal (PaCO2 35 mmHg)? 😕

Members don't see this ad.
 
Does BS III list references? Is it referring to standard hyperventilation in the treatment/resuscitation of acutely elevated ICP, or is this for limiting ICP during cranis, etc.

I'm a few years away from that, but I gather that your oral board is a time to display your textbook knowledge, not your interpretation of the most recent publications.
 
Control of Intracranial Hypertension​
As part of intensive treatment of traumatic brain injury, intracranial pressure (ICP) should be controlled when the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) falls below 70mmHg and/or the ICP is greater than 20mmHg. Intracranial hypertension occurs in approximately 40% of all patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Maintenance of an adequate cerebral perfusion pressure is more important than control of ICP per se. Measures to increase mean arterial pressure should be instituted prior to starting more complex methods of ICP control.
There are several methods for controlling ICP. These are usually applied in a stepwise fashion to achieve control, where possible. The absolute requirement for the potentially severely brain injured patient is tracheal intubation with a cuffed tube. This protects and maintains the airway and allows for maximal oxygenation and control of ventilation.
Ventilation
Carbon dioxide dilates the cerebral blood vessels, increasing the volume of blood in the intracranial vault and therefore increasing ICP. Patients should be ventilated to normocapnia (PaCO2 4.0 kPa / 30mmHg).​
Key Recommendations
tinyspot.gif
The baseline status for the severely brain injured patient is intubated, normovolaemic and normocapnic.

tinyspot.gif
Hyperventilation should not be used routinely.

tinyspot.gif
Mannitol should be reserved for acute control of ICP and administered in bolus form.


cbfpaco2.gif


Previously, hyperventilation was used routinely to maximally reduce PaCO2. No studies have shown this to improve outcome in these patients. Additionally, transcranial doppler (TCD) assessment and positron emission tomography (PET) shows this can induce significant constriction of cerebral vessels and this increase in cerebral vascular resistance may reduce cerebral blood flow to below the ischaemic threshold. One study has shown an improvement in long-term outcome when hyperventilation is not used routinely.​


Consequently hyperventilation should be used only for short periods when immediate control of ICP is necessary. For example in the patient who has an acute neurological deterioration prior to CT scanning and surgical intervention. Hyperventilation should not take the PaCO2 level to below 3.5-4 kPa as there is minimal beneficial effect on ICP below this level.


Occasionally hyperventilation may be necessary for longer periods in patients with persistently high ICPs who have not responded to other treatment modalities. These patients may benefit from more intensive neuromonitoring such as jugular venous oxygen saturation and transcranial doppler assessments to ensure cerebral perfusion is not being compromised at the expense of ICP. Persistent hyperventilation should not be used in the first 24 hours and preferably not within the first 5 days following brain injury.​


Intravenous fluid therapy​


Patients with severe brain injury should be kept normovolaemic. Previous regimens recommending that patients be kept 'dry' have essentially been discarded as there is significant risk of both hypotensive episodes (leading to a fall in cerebral perfusion) and systemic inflammatory respinse syndrome (SIRS) or multiple organ failure (MOF) leading to failure of oxygenation and ventilation. Dehydration has little effect on cerebral oedema.​


Free water (as dextrose solutions) should NOT be administered. This will decrease plasma osmolality and so increase the water content of brain tissue (the blood brain barrier acting as a semipermeable membrane). Elevated blood sugar levels are associated with a worsening of neurologic injury after episodes of global cerebral ischaemia. Ischaemic brain metabolises glucose to lactic acid, lowering tissue pH and potentially exacerbating ischaemic injury.​


Hypertonic solutions and osmotic diuretics such as mannitol will have the opposite effect. This mechanism requires an intact blood brain barrier. If this is damaged, as may be the case following injury, low molecular weight, osmotically active particles may leak into the cerebral interstitium. In this case mannitol may have no effect in reducing brain water content, and maintenance of the colloid oncotic pressure in the vessels by administration of colloids, plasma proteins or other high molecular weight compounds may, theoretically, be of benefit. However in practice, colloids offer little benefit over crystalloid solutions.​


There has been considerable interest in the use of hypertonic crystalloid solutions for the treatment of hypovolaemia in the presence of intracranial hypertension. Animal studies have proven the efficacy of hypertonic solutions in reversing shock, and sometimes in controlling ICP. Clinical trials suggest that survival after severe brain injury (GCS<9) may be improved with hypertonic solutions. However those injuries leading to a breakdown in the blood brain barrier show little or worsened response to hypertonic fluid administration.​


There is no single best fluid for patients with traumatic brain injury, but isotonic crystalloids are widely used and have good scientific basis. Normal saline or lactated RInger's solution should be the standard resuscitation fluid until further studies show a clear benefit from other therapies. Regardless of the fluid type chosen, normovolemia must be maintained and episodes of hypotension avoided.​


Mannitol​


Mannitol, a 6-carbon sugar, is widely used in head injury management, though it has never been subjected to a randomised control trial against placebo and the methods and timing of administration vary widely. It is an osmotic diuretic and can have significant beneficial effects on ICP, cerebral blood flow and brain metabolism. Mannitol has two main mechanisms of action. Immediately after bolus administration it expands circulating volume, decreases blood viscosity and therefore increases cerebral blood flow and cerebral oxygen delivery.​


Its osmotic properties take effect in 15-30 minutes when it sets up an osmotic gradient and draws water out of neurons. However after prolonged administration (continuous infusion) mannitol molecules move across into the cerebral interstitial space and may exacerbate cerebral oedema and raise ICP. Mannitol itself directly contributes to this breakdown of the blood brain barrier.​


Mannitol is therefore best used by bolus administration where an acute reduction in ICP is necessary. For example the patient with signs of impending herniation (unilateral dilated pupil / extensor posturing) or with an expanding mass lesion may benfit from mannitol to acutely reduce ICP during the time necessary for CT scanning and/or operation.​


Mannitol is wholly excreted in the urine and causes a rise in serum urine and osmolality. Patients with poor renal perfusion (shock), sepsis, receiving nephrotoxic drugs or with a serum osmolality over 320mOsm are at risk of acute tubular necrosis. Hypolaemia should be avoided with the infusion of isotonic fluids as necessary.​


Sedation and anaesthesia​


All but the most severely brain injured patients (GCS 3) will require anaesthesia for intubation. The cardiovascular responses to intubation induce a rise in ICP which is exaggerated in those patients on the cusp of the pressure-volume curve. Rapid sequence intubation is probably the safest method of establishing an airway in these patients.​


Continuing sedation will be necessary in most patients to allow adequate ventilation and to prevent coughing or fighting the ventilator. Ensuing valsalva-type maneuvers cause sharp rises in intracranial pressure. Which agents are used to achieve sedation is probably less important. However short acting preparations will allow finer control of the depth of anaesthesia and faster recovery from sedation. Agents with a longer duration of action such as diazepam may be best administered by intravenous bolus as required rather than by constant infusion to avoid build-up of active metabolites.​


Sedation is not analgesia, and pain requirements must be addressed to provide a quiet, comfortable patient. Adequate analgesia will also reduce the requirements for sedation and neuromuscular blockade.​


The use of neuromuscular blocking agents is not routinely required for continued ventilation. However some patients whose high sedative requirements lead to adverse cardiovascular effects may benefit from pharmacologic paralysis.​



trauma.org 5:1 2000


References
Cerebral blood flow following TBI​

Muizelaar JP, Marmarou A, DeSalles AA et al. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in severely head injured children. Part 1: Relationship with GCS score, outcome, ICP and PVI. J Neurosurg 71:63-71, 1989
Bouma GJ, Muizelaar JP, Stringer WA et al. Ultra early evaluation of regional cerebral blood flow in severely head injured patients using xenon enhanced computed tomography. J Neurosurg 77:360-368, 1992
Hyperventilation​

Paul RL, Polanco O, Turney SZ et al. Intracranial pressure responses to alterations in arterial carbon dioxide pressure in patients with head injuries. J Neurosurg 36:714-720, 1972
Muizelaar JP, Marmarou A, Ward JD et al. Adverse effects of prolonged hyperventilation in patients with severe head injury: A randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg 75:731-739, 1991




Obrist WD, Langfitt TW, Jaggi JL et al. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in comatose patients with acute head injury. J Neurosurg 61:241-253, 1984
Sheinberg M, Kanter MJ, Robertson CS et al. Continuous monitoring of jugular venous oxygen saturation
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
1: J Trauma. 2004 Apr;56(4):808-14. Links

The use of quantitative end-tidal capnometry to avoid inadvertent severe hyperventilation in patients with head injury after paramedic rapid sequence intubation.

Davis DP, Dunford JV, Ochs M, Park K, Hoyt DB.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103-8676, USA. [email protected]
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether field end-tidal carbon dioxide CO2 (ETCO2) monitoring decreases inadvertent severe hyperventilation after paramedic rapid sequence intubation. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively as part of the San Diego Paramedic Rapid Sequence Intubation Trial, which enrolled adults with severe head injuries (Glasgow Coma Score, 3-8) that could not be intubated without neuromuscular blockade. After preoxygenation, the patients underwent rapid sequence intubation using midazolam and succinylcholine. A maximum of three intubation attempts were allowed before Combitube insertion was mandated. Tube confirmation was accomplished by physical examination, qualitative capnometry, pulse oximetry, and syringe aspiration. Standard ventilation parameters (tidal volume, 800 mL; 12 breaths/minute) were taught. One agency used portable ETCO2 monitors, with ventilation modified to target ETCO2 values of 30 to 35 mm Hg. Trial patients transported by aeromedical crews also underwent ETCO2 monitoring. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of inadvertent severe hyperventilation, defined as arterial blood gas partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) of less than 25 mm Hg at arrival, for patients with and those without ETCO2 monitoring. These groups also were compared in terms of age, gender, clinical presentation, Abbreviated Injury Score, Injury Severity Score, arrival arterial blood gas data, and survival. RESULTS: The study enrolled 426 patients and administered neuromuscular blocking agents to 418 patients. Endotracheal intubation was successful for 355 of these patients (85.2%). Another 58 patients (13.6%) underwent Combitube insertion. For 291 successfully intubated patients, arrival pCO2 values were documented, with continuous ETCO2 monitoring performed for 144 of these patients (49.4%). Patients with ETCO2 monitoring had a lower incidence of inadvertent severe hyperventilation than those without ETCO2 monitoring (5.6% vs. 13.4%; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.20; p = 0.035). There were no significant differences in terms of age, gender, clinical presentation, Abbreviated Injury Score, Injury Severity Score, arrival partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) and pH, or survival. The patients in both groups with severe hyperventilation had a significantly higher mortality rate than the patients without hyperventilation (56 vs. 30%; odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-6.6; p = 0.016), which could not be explained solely on the basis of their injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ETCO2 monitoring is associated with a decrease in inadvertent severe hyperventilation.
 
OP,

The short sweet answer is to hyperventilate only when the patient is at risk of herniating as a temporary measure while the neurosurgeon is able to relieve the pressure.
 
OP,

The short sweet answer is to hyperventilate only when the patient is at risk of herniating as a temporary measure while the neurosurgeon is able to relieve the pressure.

And when you are using an inhaled agent to anesthetise a patient with high ICP, mild hypocarbia might be a good idea to compensate for the cerebral vasodilation caused by the inhaled agent.
 
My oral boards are coming up right around the corner in April. I've been reading about the latest recommendations for not inducing hyperventiilation for increased intracranial pressure in intracranial hypertension (Board Stiff Three). Hyperventilation would consequently result in cerebral ischemia. However, according to some textbooks I've read, hyperventilation is still considered an accepted mode of treating increased ICP.
If asked whether I would hyperventilate the patient during my oral boards, I'm not quite sure how to respond. Would you hyperventilate the patient at all (PaCO 30-35 mmHg)? Or would you maintain normocarbia but on the lower side of normal (PaCO2 35 mmHg)? 😕

The other thing you can do is discuss using a retrograde jugular bulb catheter. If you had one, you can follow venO2 sat and use it as an endpoint hyperventilation. Not done in the real world much I hear, more of an academic topic, but worth knowing about.
 
Top