My point is that board exams are basic competency exams by definition.
Get good, California
Ah. You don't know the legend of the CPJE? Listen closely to a tale of pharmacy politics past...
Once upon a time, long long ago in the days of pre-2004, there was no NAPLEX out Californey way. The Hollywood elite pharmacists refused to accept such a basic competency examination. They would brag about the graduates of pharmacy school who failed their board exams so many times that they resigned to be "graduate interns" forever. Then, in 2004, it all changed. Under pressure from the NABP, the CA Board of Pharmacy knelt to their whim and changed over to the NAPLEX.
But what of these "elite" pharmacists? How would they maintain their smug sensibilities? "Eureka!" exclaimed the Board Members! Having been tasked with creating a law exam for the Golden State, they pored over the dense legalese of their tomes looking for the trickiest of tricks to bamboozle the graduates. "I've found it!" they proclaimed as their tore the page from the book and ran through the streets. "They must have clinical knowledge! They must have clinical knowledge!" They had found Business and Professions Code 4000 et seq.
4200.2. California Practice Standards and Jurisprudence Examination for Pharmacists; Required Inclusions When developing the California Practice Standards and Jurisprudence Examination for Pharmacists, the board shall include all of the following: (a) Examination items to demonstrate the candidate's proficiency in patient communication skills. (b) Aspects of contemporary standards of practice for pharmacists in California, including, but not limited to, the provision of pharmacist care and the application of clinical knowledge to typical pharmacy practice situations that are not evaluated by the North American Pharmacy Licensure Examination.
The
law required that pharmacists have
clinical knowledge! That meant they could put
clinical knowledge on the
law exam! And so they gave up on putting actual law questions on the examination and delighted in subjecting their applicants to the tortures of old.
And that is why the CPJE #1 isn't really much of a law exam and #2 isn't really a minimal competency exam.