- Joined
- Mar 23, 2008
- Messages
- 64
- Reaction score
- 0
CVS is ok because the hours are pretty flexible if you need time off for appointments or something, you can always call someone to fill in for you. Walgreen is probably better pay though
I would'nt recommend CVS either. I worked there for 2 months. I was new to the pharmacy field and had never worked before as a tech and they put me alone with a rotating pharmacist who didnt know the rules either. We had a drive thru too and it was horrible!!! I managed to learn a lot though, but I wouldnt want to work there again. I think it depends on the store too.
lol, that sounded almost like me when i first started working, but i work for Rite-Aid. The first week on the job, they put me alone with a pharmacist, sometimes a floater, and i was still new to the pharmacy field, so i didn't know anything. We had a drive thru too, and 2 registers, and it would just be me and the pharmacist. And this store does on average 350-400 scripts a day!! It was absolutely suicidal.
I've been with Walgreen's through all the steps, scary as it is, and like them. What I heard about Rite-Aid and CVS is rather discouraging in general... though grocery stores tend to be slower, if you don't like/can't handle stress. Target also pays their interns better and has much better tuition reimbursement, but Walgreen's pay for pharmacists is better.
And at Walgreen's (don't know about other places) even if you work very part-time, you accumulate vacation and seniority, so if you start in pre-pharm, by the time you graduate you have three weeks of vacation and can be placed into your own store quickly.
If you are a young and energetic pharmacist, you can consider CVS. CVS does wear you down. When CVS took over Savon in the west coast, many pharmacists left CVS.
For pharmacist, CVS literally monitors every single prescription you fill. The District Managers know how long it took you to fill it and its recorded on paper. This means the company knows your performance inside out and your bonuses and sometimes your salary may depend on these recorded performance. Some say this is fair but for many, its "big brother" watching and squeezing maximum amount of output out of its workers.
For example, most pharmacists want to finish filling their waiters first so there won't be a long line out the door and patients can go home quickly. But, CVS's push for shorter filling time presents an competing incentive to finish the prescription that was received first. This means you can't do it your way; you have to do it strictly the CVS way.
I'm sure there is good and bad to any place.
I recommend you work at a private hospital (I recommend Kaiser. I heard they pay really well)
If you like to work at any retail pharmacy, try to get a pharmacy manager position. Make sure you have a good staff of pharmacists, techs and clerks. Work hard and aim towards becoming a Pharmacy District manager. I heard they get paid like an MD or more
I automatically put everything in at a 3 hour wait, but we finish them like in 30 minutes so it makes us look good.
CVS is ok because the hours are pretty flexible if you need time off for appointments or something, you can always call someone to fill in for you. Walgreen is probably better pay though
You guys are aware all the criticisms leveled at CVS can be said about wag also. It depends on the store you work at and the district.
I use to work for Kaiser, and I went to CVS/Savon's. I hated CVS/Savon's, so I went to Walgreen's. I moved around a bit and worked at different stores. Some stores were a dream to work at, others suck. Last store I worked at, made me want to quit my job, in which i ultimately did. Working in a retail environment, made me wish I never left Kaiser.
Bottom line: the grass isn't always greener on the otherside. In the case of working retail, its the damn same grass.
Also: In Socal, Wag pharmacists are not salaried unless they work at a unionized store. If they work 30 hours, they only get paid 30 hours. If they work 47 hours, they get paid 40 + 7 OT hours. Graveyards work 70 hours, but with the graveyard differential, are paid 80 hours.
CVS is a bit of a paradoxical store. We just got listed as an "Excellent Store" for the Pharmacy department in December 2007. I think it directly relates to the fact that we have 2 regular pharmacists now.
Before, we had one pharmacist, and different floaters every other weekend, Mondays, and Tuesdays, so nobody knew what the hell was going on other than the regular technicians. I generally held down the fort as the lead tech on the weekends, but when the floaters were around, we were lost.
So yeah we did good from September to December because of the addition of a regular pharmacist, and no more floaters. But, CVS goes and cuts tech hours from 130 hours to 110 hours.
So yeah, now we're shorthanded. On Friday evenings, from 5PM on, it is just me and the pharmacist, and we get overwhelmed because this is when people pick up and drop off their prescriptions.
Both me and the pharmacist hate working the pickup line, so what generally happens is that, someone is always at drop off, and 1/2 the time the other person is at pick up, this results in production being shut down.
I Can't believe you left Kaiser. But I understand sometimes people move and life happens. Kaiser and retail stores both work you hard. The difference is you get much higher pay at Kaiser and I assume a potential higher raise each year as well.
i agree it depends on the storeI would'nt recommend CVS either. I worked there for 2 months. I was new to the pharmacy field and had never worked before as a tech and they put me alone with a rotating pharmacist who didnt know the rules either. We had a drive thru too and it was horrible!!! I managed to learn a lot though, but I wouldnt want to work there again. I think it depends on the store too.
I have worked for Walgreens for over 5 years and I love it. Their benefits/401K, etc are unheard of. I am going to stay with them as a pharmacist if I decide on retail pharmacy.