Daptomycin vs. Vanc/Gent

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Praziquantel86

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
10+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
2,569
Reaction score
40
Cost-effectiveness analysis just published in CID. They found the cost of daptomycin to be similar to vanco/gent for MRSA +/- endocarditis. Anybody think this is going to have any sort of an impact on the way people use the drugs? I personally would have liked gent to be included in the daptomycin arm as well, at least in endocarditis cases.


Bhavnani SM; Prakhya A; Hammel JP; Ambrose PG. Cost-Effectiveness of Daptomycin versus Vancomycin and Gentamicin for Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and/or Endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:691-698


Background.
2003.gif
Methicillin‐resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasingly common cause of bacteremia and endocarditis. The cost‐effectiveness (CE) of daptomycin was compared with that of vancomycin‐gentamicin in patients with MRSA bacteremia with or without endocarditis.

Methods.
2003.gif
With use of data from an open‐label, randomized study comparing daptomycin with vancomycin‐gentamicin in the aforementioned patient population, 3 cost strata were considered: (1) study drug acquisition (daptomycin, $0.37/mg; vancomycin, $7/g; and gentamicin, $0.12/mg); (2) stratum 1 plus the cost of therapy for treatment failures and adverse events, therapeutic drug monitoring, and preparation and administration of all medications; and (3) stratum 2 plus hospital bed costs. Drug costs were based on mean wholesale price, with other costs based on those for a typical community hospital. Cost‐effectiveness ratios were calculated as cost divided by proportion of successes. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the study drug cost.


Results.
2003.gif
Forty‐five (20 successes) and 44 (14 successes) patients received daptomycin and vancomycin‐gentamicin, respectively. The respective median cost‐effectiveness ratios for daptomycin and vancomycin‐gentamicin for each cost stratum were as follows: $4082 (range, $1062–$13,893) and $560 (range, $66–$1649) for stratum 1 (
eq-00001.gif
); $4582 (range, $1109–$21,882) and $1635 (range, $163–$33,444) for stratum 2 (
eq-00002.gif
); $23,639 (range, $6225–$141,132) and $26,073 (range, $5349–$187,287) for stratum 3 (
eq-00003.gif
). Sensitivity analyses indicated that if the cost of vancomycin was $0, strata 3 cost‐effectiveness ratios did not differ ($23,639 and $25,668, respectively;
eq-00004.gif
). Similar results between groups were seen among patients with bacteremia.


Conclusions.
2003.gif
When all costs of therapy were considered, the cost‐effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin‐gentamicin was similar, even if the cost of vancomycin was $0.
 
Clincal outcomes?

I prefer to save my dapto, thank you very much. I love being the antibiotics police. No dapto for you!
 
I will dispute the outcomes once I read the article. how much money did cubist spend on this?
 
I will dispute the outcomes once I read the article. how much money did cubist spend on this?

Probably a lot. The price-point of $0.38/mg seems pretty reasonable, but it doesn't take into account the excess amount in each vial that inevitably gets wasted.

Regarding clinical outcomes, aren't the two fairly comparable? I don't have the citation, but I thought dapto was found to be non-inferior.
 
Probably a lot. The price-point of $0.38/mg seems pretty reasonable, but it doesn't take into account the excess amount in each vial that inevitably gets wasted.

Regarding clinical outcomes, aren't the two fairly comparable? I don't have the citation, but I thought dapto was found to be non-inferior.

What would reasons would make me reach for vanco over daptomycin in the majority of clinical situations?
 
What would reasons would make me reach for vanco over daptomycin in the majority of clinical situations?

Maybe the fact that vancomycin has been studied for 5 decades or so longer than daptomycin. That and there are no or little data published substantiating a claim that daptomycin is of superior efficacy when it comes to treating ORSA. Oh, and that minor problem regarding daptomycin not being useful to treat pneumonia......
 
Prazi,

You have a copy of the article? If so, can you email it to me?
 
Maybe the fact that vancomycin has been studied for 5 decades or so longer than daptomycin. That and there are no or little data published substantiating a claim that daptomycin is of superior efficacy when it comes to treating ORSA. Oh, and that minor problem regarding daptomycin not being useful to treat pneumonia......

Pri, I read Karm's question was a teaching point for Prazi, not that she was asking for her own knowledge. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'd think she'd already know the answer since she's in an ID residency...
 
Pri, I read Karm's question was a teaching point for Prazi, not that she was asking for her own knowledge. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'd think she'd already know the answer since she's in an ID residency...

Haha, thanks, I had that feeling too. Damn it, I shouldn't wake up half hung over and start firing off posts.
 
And that little thing called resistance....
 
Do you mind sending me the article too please? I PM'd you my e-mail. Thanks a lot!
 
Top