Delete

Started by nkt16
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So essentially a rigorous graduate curriculum including immunology, cell biology and genetics don't matter as much as undergrad? I know grades are so padded in graduate school, so my 4.0 is probably useless.

I mean I can take undergrad courses while I'm in grad school as well, it just confuses me a little as to how that is perceived.

To be clear, my last two years of undergrad were almost straight A's and all 400 level science courses (my degree is in Immunology). My gpa literally comes from failing classes like religion 101 and hebrew 1 throughout my time of illness.
Gpa screens are often around 3.0.
Trend is also important but if no one is there to see it...
 
Yeah, understood. So how is a SMP seen as different than graduate work if the uGPA screen exists?
SMP's are designed to predict medical school performance. The grades are not inflated.
They often have relationships with schools into which they feed.
Some of them offer interviews to those who do well.
 
I was also in Immunology. One thing which I think helped me in my application was taking multiple basic medical science courses during my early graduate years with the medical students and doing extremely well as I needed to be in the top 10% of the class to earn an A. Perhaps you could do the same? Might also help you perform better in a future SMP.