Well. A few points. For context, I am an ER doctor that went to a land grant university as an out of state student. It was my only acceptance after 3 years of applications (shout out to PP9 for recommending I apply). I then repeated first year for failing out. I've just left ER for GP after saying I'd never leave because of corporate money shenanigans from what I thought was my unicorn clinic.
Firstly, yes the GNU (Generalized NAVLE understanding) will be replacing the traditional midterm and finals at least for this first semester as we are trying something new.
This isn't all that new. Illinois has been doing this (mega-test for midterm and finals) for over ten years. It's got its pros or cons, but it overall works. No regrets there from me as probably the third or fourth class that did it like that.
What is new is the allele program with irats, trats, etc. That was attempted by Illinois under Drs. Aldridge and Aldridge, who are phenomenal educators. However, because it was only in their classes, it didn't work out.
I think the TBL program from the very beginning is actually a good move (see my posts #853 and 856). But it is equally for people who have never been in this type of class to be upset a week in of something new. It's no different than people getting through vet school and start paying those loans and realizing that going to the expensive option was t worth the money.
I find it incredibly offensive to call this "trendy" because its not, its a different way of thinking and learning
It is trendy. Like by definition. It wasn't a statement on whether or not it is a good way to teach.
There is new staff joining daily, and that will continue throughout the first year (some staff are finishing up prior contracts therefore are joining closer to the fall).
This is a huge problem for me. They simply shouldn't have opened without their faculty figured out. The **only** reason a business would open with minimal staff is the money. They are getting an extra year of income.
What makes this type of curriculum not work is the constant negativity I am seeing being spread, both by current students in our discord and on these online forums.
contribute to the negativity instead of having an open mind you shouldn't say anything at all.
Nah uh. Not cool. Telling people to keep their negative opinions to themselves is speech control and censorship that should not exist in a professional program. Absolutely not.
If you're (royal you, not you specifically) are going to say a week is not enough time to say a program is bad, it is also not enough time to say it is good either.
Our building is super nice and new stuff is delivered every day!
Why wasn't it delivered before classes started??
I am struggling to understand why this specific point is such a big issue for you.
With what vet school costs, a specialist should be teaching you. Full stop. If we look at a doctorate not as simply an education, but as a business investment where your brain is the product, then it is unacceptable for you to pay as much or more for this education than those that are being taught by specialists.
I'm a pretty good doctor in both the hard and soft skills. I love teaching students on externships. I am no way on the same level as my DACVECC or DACVIM colleagues.
There have been talks of establishing local large animal training places instead.
Why is this being considered now after the program has opened?? Why are they not prepared??
Okay, soapbox: no school, none, need a month of NAVLE prep. Whether the school implementing this is the oldest school in the world or the newest.
The pre-clinical and clinical education should absolutely be enough for students to pass NAVLE, especially now that we are out of the immediate shadow of COVID.
I have worked with three vets who graduated from LMU TN, all of which are incredible and not "profit driven", I know for sure this program is not just producing profit and will create compassionate and competent doctors!
The doctors are almost never profit driven, regardless of where they went to school.
The **business** the doctor (or pre-doctor in this case) however is always about business first. Even the land grant universities. We are seeing it out in practice with PE sticking fingers into a variety of corporates that give ER doctors like me 1 tech per doctor at 8pm on a Saturday night.
In this case, we (as a profession) had a school open without their facilities being done, their faculty team fleshed out, and one of the largest class sizes. They didn't open this early to benefit you as the first cohort.
I still don't understand why it's a big deal for someone who is already a veterinarian.
I cannot emphasize this enough: every single veterinarian should care about the universities teaching our future colleagues. You are our future students that we will be bringing into our hospitals to teach on our own time and dime. You are the future baby doctors we will be hiring and mentoring.
Likewise, going back to the business perspective: there are something like 7-10 schools opening in the next 12 months.... In the middle of an economic downturn... Where vet med industry inflation was 6% last month.... Where we are, at our economic core, a luxury service industry where people do not absolutely have to spend their money with us. Opening enough schools to potentially graduate 1500-2000 extra doctors a year is potentially going to lead to a glut of vets where you new grads may be caught in a similar situation as 2008 where there were 2 doctors for every open position. The difference is that tuition then was significantly lower then compared to now.
The next step after that is the direct salary depression that is possible because the PE firms that own predominate stakes in the majority of corporations in vet med will absolutely low ball new grads on salary.
Again: every veterinarian should be invested in not just these new schools, but all of them.
I do not anticipate that I will be doing a liver lobectomy.
You absolutely don't know that.