DISCUSS: News on Future veterinary schools

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Yet another one…
 

Yet another one…

Gotta say, I'd be shocked if the list of new schools suddenly becomes extremely short if the bill passes as is
 
What bill are you talking about?
The Big Beautiful Bill that is proposing to limit graduate students to 150 or 200k of federal loans, which is like half of the current costs for veterinary (and medical and dental) schools.

If there’s suddenly a limit on what can be borrowed, new schools might not have as much of a blank check when setting their tuition and it may not be worth it to set up a school anymore, especially at the for-profit institutions. Though the cynic in me says the schools won’t care and they’ll just leave students to find predatory private loans or just take the wealthy until there’s an administration change and things can potentially get shaken up again.
 
The Big Beautiful Bill that is proposing to limit graduate students to 150 or 200k of federal loans, which is like half of the current costs for veterinary (and medical and dental) schools.

If there’s suddenly a limit on what can be borrowed, new schools might not have as much of a blank check when setting their tuition and it may not be worth it to set up a school anymore, especially at the for-profit institutions. Though the cynic in me says the schools won’t care and they’ll just leave students to find predatory private loans or just take the wealthy until there’s an administration change and things can potentially get shaken up again.
I worry the latter will happen as well. There are already students who take private loans to go over current federal maximums (or if they don't qualify). Especially considering the response to already declining undergraduate admissions at many universities has been to raise tuition...
 
I worry the latter will happen as well. There are already students who take private loans to go over current federal maximums (or if they don't qualify). Especially considering the response to already declining undergraduate admissions at many universities has been to raise tuition...
Bingooooo, I think this would make school even more expensive. Sure, maybe the smaller ones would die off but I don’t see state schools reducing tuition.

This whole republican plan to “reduce school costs” just reminds me of how trickle down economics was supposed to make everyone richer. I think it’s clear how that plan turned out & they knew it all along. Project 2025 only mentioned transitioning federal loans to the private sector so I think the reducing costs line is a load of BS. Would love to be proven wrong, but if the cap applies to students that have been grandfathered in I guess I’ll be dropping out of vet school after my first year.
 
i read that earlier. i dont exactly know what that means?
Looks like they don’t meet the research standards for accreditation and are suing because of it, claiming that it’s in the AVMAs interest to have fewer accredited schools so they just found a reason to put them on probation. At least that’s how I interpreted it.
 
Looks like they don’t meet the research standards for accreditation and are suing because of it, claiming that it’s in the AVMAs interest to have fewer accredited schools so they just found a reason to put them on probation. At least that’s how I interpreted it.
right but how does what does this mean now? while this lawsuit unfolds will schools waiting on accrediation have to wait to get their letter of reasonable assurance incase they DO change the requirements? CAN the requirements be changed?
 
That’s how I read it too. Their TN program is probationary and it sounds like the planned Florida expansion is not going to meet requirements either. It’s probably cheaper to find a reason to sue than fund a research program. It’s not like requiring research is a new requirement but sounds like they want to force the COE to change standards and let them be accredited, which of course they would want that because it’s a for profit institution.

I think Western had to sue the AVMA to get them to approve distributive clinics back in the day when they very first proposed that, but after Western sued the AVMA, the COE did decided to approve their letter of reasonable assurance and now it’s an acceptable model. So it isn’t unfounded that a lawsuit can lead to standards changing/the AVMA giving in, but I’d have to go read about how exactly Western approached it all those years ago.

Edit: and old articles about Western’s lawsuit: WesternU drops antitrust lawsuit against AVMA

 
Last edited:
Idk where to put this but this thread seems reasonable but I just saw this:

Current LMU student here - how screwed are my peers and I? I went out on a limb and turned down an acceptance at my top choice school (LMU was significantly cheaper) and now I’m starting to regret my life choices :/
 
Current LMU student here - how screwed are my peers and I? I went out on a limb and turned down an acceptance at my top choice school (LMU was significantly cheaper) and now I’m starting to regret my life choices :/
If they’re accredited, even provisionally, when you start, you should be allowed to sit NAVLE like any other graduate from an accredited college. And honestly their NAVLE pass rates are average/decent (high 80s low 90s recently when other more established schools have been lower) so they seem to be doing fine in that regard for now at least.

Apparently the rules are potentially different for international programs and they may not be given that grace period, but if you’re in the US that’s the established rule.

Lots of schools go probationary. That’s not a huge deal for students most of the time. Most make changes to make the COE happy and get fully reinstated. It’s something to watch especially for students farther out from starting.
 
Doesn’t it make you question AVMA when a school like LMU is put on probation while a school like Ross is not? It seems like LMU puts money back into the vet school while Ross does not. Wonder how Ross gets away with not investing into their campus. Do you think AVMA actually visits Ross’ campus?
 
Sorry, my comment was out of sarcasm after visiting people at Ross. I knew about the visits but think the results should come out sooner then they do.
 
If they’re accredited, even provisionally, when you start, you should be allowed to sit NAVLE like any other graduate from an accredited college. And honestly their NAVLE pass rates are average/decent (high 80s low 90s recently when other more established schools have been lower) so they seem to be doing fine in that regard for now at least.

Apparently the rules are potentially different for international programs and they may not be given that grace period, but if you’re in the US that’s the established rule.

Lots of schools go probationary. That’s not a huge deal for students most of the time. Most make changes to make the COE happy and get fully reinstated. It’s something to watch especially for students farther out from starting.
Thank you for this!! I’ve heard that we get grandfathered in since it was accredited when we started, it just makes me nervous to see my school trying to go head to head with AVMA😅
 
Doesn’t it make you question AVMA when a school like LMU is put on probation while a school like Ross is not? It seems like LMU puts money back into the vet school while Ross does not. Wonder how Ross gets away with not investing into their campus. Do you think AVMA actually visits Ross’ campus?
As Jayna mentioned it's not uncommon for schools to go on probationary for many reasons and visits are done and more focused site visits are done prn for deficiencies. There is ALOT of work that goes into the site visits and the deficiencies schools are given. Those decisions are not made lightly. Also being placed on probationary accreditation a school is still far away from terminal accreditation.

Contrary to alot of peoples assumptions LMUs issue with the research standard doesn't have to do with them having a distributive model and not having a teaching hospital. Meeting the research standard can be accomplished in many ways which is why it is written as it is. It'll be interesting to see where the lawsuit goes. LMU is throwing a fit preemptively and due to other factors trying to get their way but that's just my opinion 🤷‍♀️
 
Any thoughts on the lawsuit that LMU just filed against the AVMA? Should we be worried that they may lose their accreditation status?
 
Doesn’t it make you question AVMA when a school like LMU is put on probation while a school like Ross is not? It seems like LMU puts money back into the vet school while Ross does not. Wonder how Ross gets away with not investing into their campus. Do you think AVMA actually visits Ross’ campus?
This is an....interesting take.

I'm not sure if you're fully understanding the gravity of this and the probable drive behind it. LMU is effectively suing because they want the CoE to reduce their accreditation standards so it is easier for LMU to maintain accreditation/achieve accreditation at the new campus(es) they want to build down the line. They have no interest in establishing a fully functioning vet school/teaching hospital. They don't want to contribute to advancing the profession beyond hemorrhaging graduates into the workforce every year. They want the bare minimum so they can take in as many students as possible without investing in those students/the profession at all, actually. Literally trying to establish a vet school as cheaply/quickly as possible so they can continue to charge private tuition rates to as many students as possible (currently their estimated COA is just under $100k/year, expenses included though), and then farm them out to other clinics who will teach them in their clinical year (often for free, while the student continues to pay tuition to LMU for that, mind you).

So basically, the accreditation standards that have been around for many years, and many vet schools have been meeting for many years, (or new standards that have been met by many schools in stride) should be dropped so LMU doesn't have to work as hard/spend as much money? And ironically alluding to a conflict of interest between the AVMA and CoE?

"The suit also claims that the AVMA is using its monopoly power to restrict new and existing veterinary schools from getting accreditation through its Council on Education (COE) by requiring schools to meet requirements necessary to graduate veterinarians that are ready on the first day of their careers." In other words, LMU is pissed that the AVMA/COE is actually looking out for the profession's sustainability and the quality of graduates being put out. We are truly going to be so screwed in 10-20 years with these schools coming out.

As a side note, some of the funding they are sourcing for their new campus is from corps that are fundamentally damaging to the veterinary profession, too, so that truly goes to show you how little LMU actually is investing in the profession. When I saw that headline, that's all I needed to know about LMU. I think the only way they could have stooped lower was to get funding from Mars.
 
Last edited:
And that's not to say that Ross and others *shouldn't* be on probation at all. This isn't mutually exclusive. My soapbox has always been and always will be 1) the low NAVLE threshold and 2) that attrition isn't included in accreditation standards. If that was the case, Ross certainly would be in trouble.
 
And that's not to say that Ross and others *shouldn't* be on probation at all. This isn't mutually exclusive. My soapbox has always been and always will be 1) the low NAVLE threshold and 2) that attrition isn't included in accreditation standards. If that was the case, Ross certainly would be in trouble.
Does anyone have any rough numbers on who leaves Carib schools due to academics vs. on their own volition (transferring, can't handle island living, other)?

ETA: Also +1 on the fact that this isn't mutually exclusive. Multiple schools have deficiencies of concern at this point, multiple schools are expanding class sizes with questionable ability to provide adequate resources, and one OG US school is facing terminal accreditation. But LMU wants to drop standards...?
 
Last edited:
Does anyone have any rough numbers on who leaves Carib schools due to academics vs. on their own volition (transferring, can't handle island living, other)?

Not that I've found
 
i did some veterinary work in Japan and something i find interesting is that it is required by the JVMA for all veterinary students to participate in a research lab (funded by their veterinary university) and write/present a thesis upon graduation. (granted vet school there is 6 years so they have the time to do that). not to say that US schools should require this, but i feel like having the resources for research should be the bare minimum (・・?)
 
Does anyone have any rough numbers on who leaves Carib schools due to academics vs. on their own volition (transferring, can't handle island living, other)?

ETA: Also +1 on the fact that this isn't mutually exclusive. Multiple schools have deficiencies of concern at this point, multiple schools are expanding class sizes with questionable ability to provide adequate resources, and one OG US school is facing terminal accreditation. But LMU wants to drop standards...?
AVMA should require attrition numbers to be published. Ross is a school that is expanding class sizes with questionable ability to provide adequate resources which is why I don’t understand how COE doesn’t notice that on their site visit. Did Ross know their facilities were in need of repair/replacement prior to 2021 since student housing was suppose to be completed in 2021?
(Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine – BCER – Engineering | Technology | Life Safety)
 
AVMA should require attrition numbers to be published. Ross is a school that is expanding class sizes with questionable ability to provide adequate resources which is why I don’t understand how COE doesn’t notice that on their site visit. Did Ross know their facilities were in need of repair/replacement prior to 2021 since student housing was suppose to be completed in 2021?
(Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine – BCER – Engineering | Technology | Life Safety)
No one here is going to disagree about publishing attrition rates, as long as we can get detail on academic dismissals vs. other dismissals/dropping out.

MANY schools are expanding class sizes without expanding resources, though. That's literally what I said. Multiple schools are in this exact position. I'm not sure why you are singling Ross out, although looking at your post history, my guess is there is a personal vendetta at play. That's fine, but it it's not just Ross with issues.

Why are you thinking the CoE is blissfully unaware of the things you are concerned about? The problem is that when probably every single accredited school has facilities issues, you can't hand slap one school without hand slapping all of them. The CoE cannot make 30+ schools expand hospitals/classrooms/labs/etc. Or come up with millions of dollars to renovate and bring things up to more modern medicine standards. I am sure all schools want bigger and better, but those plans take literal decades to write up, plan for, fund for, and actually complete.

Shoot, my own school had an emergency site visit by the CoE when we 'accidentally' overfilled the c/o 2020 by like 40 or so students. Meanwhile, a normal class size of 120ish (my class, 2019) still had to fight amongst themselves for basic things like a dentistry or ophtho rotation. On top of that, my class of 120 was already spilling out of the teaching hospital before counting the island students that came for their clinical year and the fact that we had 1st/2nd years spend 8 weeks each in the hospital with us as well. My school has since renovated certain areas, but we were literally sitting in closets on certain services because they didn't have space for the students. Some services could only physically fit 2-3 students in additional to the tech(s) and clinician.

Also, CoE has nothing to do with student housing, or really any facilities beyond the vet school, so I am not understanding why that would be relevant here. The CoE does not evaluate housing availability or other non-vet related campus resources. All universities, with a vet school or not, have something somewhere that needs to be redone or are focusing funds on more glamorous areas (which bring attention, funding, etc. to the school). If accreditation was based on not having facilities in need of 'repair/replacement,' there wouldn't be a single functional institution of higher education (or probably even lower education) in this country. I'll bring up my big 10 undergrad (that does have a vet school), which installed a $10 million scoreboard (which is now being replaced a little over 10 years later for another $10 million) in the football stadium at the same time that 8 of us had to share a damaged microscope and 3 chairs in one of my zoology labs.
 
Last edited:
MANY schools are expanding class sizes without expanding resources, though.
A great example of this is tufts. Expanded class size with no resources expanded, didn’t have a classroom big enough for everyone to have a seat, enough animals in their teaching herd, parking, madness etc.. it’s most definitely NOT just an island school problem.
 
Why are you thinking the CoE is blissfully unaware of the things you are concerned about? The problem is that when probably every single accredited school has facilities issues, you can't hand slap one school without hand slapping all of them. The CoE cannot make 30+ schools expand hospitals/classrooms/labs/etc. Or come up with millions of dollars to renovate and bring things up to more modern medicine standards. I am sure all schools want bigger and better, but those plans take literal decades to write up, plan for, fund for, and actually complete.
This is pretty much what happened to Oklahoma State recently too. Facilities weren’t their only deficiency when they were more recently put on probation, but they sorted out the others pretty quickly. Probation continued because of facilities concerns and they had to basically start a public/legislature campaign that essentially said, ‘we need money for a new hospital to be built or we’re going to lose accreditation and have to close’ because renovating/expanding the current wasn’t very feasible. And luckily they were given at least most of the money, so now they can start planning and building and maybe in a few years there’ll be a new facility.
 
A great example of this is tufts. Expanded class size with no resources expanded, didn’t have a classroom big enough for everyone to have a seat, enough animals in their teaching herd, parking, madness etc.. it’s most definitely NOT just an island school problem.
I started typing up a thing on UofI, but there's honestly so much to unpack on what happened between 2018 and 2020. And a lottttt of opinions (and a conspiracy theory or two) about what really happened, why it happened, and in what order. I tend to bite my tongue on it because my anonymity is loose at best. University of Illinois reports largest veterinary class

I think part of the problem is that like any large corporation, which is essentially what a large university is, money is funneled to whatever actually brings in money. For universities, that's often sports, human medicine, sexy research, whatever. So those facilities see big upgrades routinely, whereas vet med not so much because we aren't as profitable for the school (I think most teaching hospitals actually cost universities quite a bit of money? I thought I read that somewhere). By bringing in more students, you are by default pushing the university to funnel more resources your way. Or so one would think. But again, when you're in a large university, things literally take years to accomplish.
 
No one here is going to disagree about publishing attrition rates, as long as we can get detail on academic dismissals vs. other dismissals/dropping out.

MANY schools are expanding class sizes without expanding resources, though. That's literally what I said. Multiple schools are in this exact position. I'm not sure why you are singling Ross out, although looking at your post history, my guess is there is a personal vendetta at play. That's fine, but it it's not just Ross with issues.

Why are you thinking the CoE is blissfully unaware of the things you are concerned about? The problem is that when probably every single accredited school has facilities issues, you can't hand slap one school without hand slapping all of them. The CoE cannot make 30+ schools expand hospitals/classrooms/labs/etc. Or come up with millions of dollars to renovate and bring things up to more modern medicine standards. I am sure all schools want bigger and better, but those plans take literal decades to write up, plan for, fund for, and actually complete.

Shoot, my own school had an emergency site visit by the CoE when we 'accidentally' overfilled the c/o 2020 by like 40 or so students. Meanwhile, a normal class size of 120ish (my class, 2019) still had to fight amongst themselves for basic things like a dentistry or ophtho rotation. On top of that, my class of 120 was already spilling out of the teaching hospital before counting the island students that came for their clinical year and the fact that we had 1st/2nd years spend 8 weeks each in the hospital with us as well. My school has since renovated certain areas, but we were literally sitting in closets on certain services because they didn't have space for the students. Some services could only physically fit 2-3 students in additional to the tech(s) and clinician.

Also, CoE has nothing to do with student housing, or really any facilities beyond the vet school, so I am not understanding why that would be relevant here. The CoE does not evaluate housing availability or other non-vet related campus resources. All universities, with a vet school or not, have something somewhere that needs to be redone or are focusing funds on more glamorous areas (which bring attention, funding, etc. to the school). If accreditation was based on not having facilities in need of 'repair/replacement,' there wouldn't be a single functional institution of higher education (or probably even lower education) in this country. I'll bring up my big 10 undergrad (that does have a vet school), which installed a $10 million scoreboard (which is now being replaced a little over 10 years later for another $10 million) in the football stadium at the same time that 8 of us had to share a damaged microscope and 3 chairs in one of my zoology labs.
Yep. First expanded class here. They didn’t think much through. We would have mandatory classes and there weren’t enough seats in the lecture hall to fit our entire class. Labs were worse.
 
A great example of this is tufts. Expanded class size with no resources expanded, didn’t have a classroom big enough for everyone to have a seat, enough animals in their teaching herd, parking, madness etc.. it’s most definitely NOT just an island school problem.
*insert my monthly rant about parking at UF*
 
Classroom sizes are only a part of the problem. The student housing was shut down because of mold in the buildings. If the student housing has mold in them do you think those are the only buildings with mold? By the way I know COE doesn’t care about student housing but my point is if those buildings have it what the chances those are the only buildings with it. I have no vendetta against the school. With the price Ross charges don’t you think students deserve buildings that are at least respectable?
 
So, out of curiosity, I looked up all the schools and their accreditation status, and then found what their issues are if they have any sort of ding against them. I think @Rejected Med_Vet_Students and @pp9 are essentially saying the same things, just on different levels. Rejected is on the granular level for a single school while PP9 is about the status of accreditation standards as a whole.

1. Tuskegee: Probationary accreditation
- Major deficiency in Standards 2 (finances), 4 (clinical resources), and 11 (outcomes)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

2. Midwestern: Full accreditation
- Minor deficiency in Standard 8 (faculty)

3. Iowa: Full accreditation
- Minor deficiencies in Standards 3 (physical facilities/equipment) and 9 (curriculum)
- Initiated March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

4. Lincoln Memorial: Probationary accreditation
- Major deficiency in Standard 10 (research)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

5. Washington: Full accreditation
- Minor deficiencies in Standards 3 (physical facilities/equipment), 4 (clinical resources), 9 (curriculum), and 11 (outcomes)
- Initiated March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

6. Long Island: Provisional accreditation
- No current deficiencies, next eval 2025

7. Texas Tech: Provisional accreditation
- No current deficiencies, next eval 2025

8. UAGM (PR): Provisional accreditation
- No current deficiencies, next eval 2025
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

9. Arizona: Provisional accreditation
- No current deficiences, next eval TBD
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

10. Guelph: Probationary accreditation
- Minor deficiency in Standard 3 (physical facilities/equipment)
- Continued as of May 2025

11. Saskatchewan: Full accreditation
- Minor deficiency in Standard 3 (physical facilities/equipment)
- Initiated March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

12. RVC: Probationary accreditation
- Major deficiency in Standard 11 (outcomes)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

13. Glasgow: Probationary accreditation
- Major deficiency in Standard 11 (outcomes)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

14. Utrecht: Probationary accreditation
- Minor deficiency in Standard 3 (physical facilities/equipment)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)
- Placed Dec 2024

15. Seoul: Probationary accreditation
- Minor deficiencies in Standards 1 (organization) and 4 (clinical resources)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)
- Placed Dec 2024

16. Rowan: Letter of Reasonable Assurance
- Continued March 2025 based on biannual report

17. Utah: Letter of Reasonable Assurance
- Granted March 2025 based on comprehensive site visit

18. Mexico: Withdrawal of accreditation
- March 2025, approved of voluntary request

Now, schools maintaining or brought back into full accreditation:
- March 2025
- PEI and Cornell, off of actions
- Interim reports: Auburn, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Purdue, Ohio, Texas A&M, Tufts, Edinburgh, Bristol, Calgary, Davis, Dublin, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Liverpool, Melbourne, Minnesota, Missouri, Montreal, Nottingham, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Virginia-Maryland, VetAgro, Western California
- Sept 2024
- Interim reports: Murdoch, Massey

And quite literally, the reports just keep going and going and going. So I'm going to stop there.

For what it's worth, Rejected, Ross and SGU have a site visit this year. Schools get to maintain their good accreditation standards in general for several years before getting dinged at their next site visit.
And the COE is composed of volunteers that have terms for 6 years at a time. I seriously considered it but there is a commitment of over 150 days in your obligation for which the only thing that is paid are your travel expenses. It does take time to go through all of these site visits and meetings. Major exemptions are obviously things like bad NAVLE scores multiple years in a row.
 
So, out of curiosity, I looked up all the schools and their accreditation status, and then found what their issues are if they have any sort of ding against them. I think @Rejected Med_Vet_Students and @pp9 are essentially saying the same things, just on different levels. Rejected is on the granular level for a single school while PP9 is about the status of accreditation standards as a whole.

1. Tuskegee: Probationary accreditation
- Major deficiency in Standards 2 (finances), 4 (clinical resources), and 11 (outcomes)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

2. Midwestern: Full accreditation
- Minor deficiency in Standard 8 (faculty)

3. Iowa: Full accreditation
- Minor deficiencies in Standards 3 (physical facilities/equipment) and 9 (curriculum)
- Initiated March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

4. Lincoln Memorial: Probationary accreditation
- Major deficiency in Standard 10 (research)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

5. Washington: Full accreditation
- Minor deficiencies in Standards 3 (physical facilities/equipment), 4 (clinical resources), 9 (curriculum), and 11 (outcomes)
- Initiated March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

6. Long Island: Provisional accreditation
- No current deficiencies, next eval 2025

7. Texas Tech: Provisional accreditation
- No current deficiencies, next eval 2025

8. UAGM (PR): Provisional accreditation
- No current deficiencies, next eval 2025
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

9. Arizona: Provisional accreditation
- No current deficiences, next eval TBD
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

10. Guelph: Probationary accreditation
- Minor deficiency in Standard 3 (physical facilities/equipment)
- Continued as of May 2025

11. Saskatchewan: Full accreditation
- Minor deficiency in Standard 3 (physical facilities/equipment)
- Initiated March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

12. RVC: Probationary accreditation
- Major deficiency in Standard 11 (outcomes)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

13. Glasgow: Probationary accreditation
- Major deficiency in Standard 11 (outcomes)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)

14. Utrecht: Probationary accreditation
- Minor deficiency in Standard 3 (physical facilities/equipment)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)
- Placed Dec 2024

15. Seoul: Probationary accreditation
- Minor deficiencies in Standards 1 (organization) and 4 (clinical resources)
- Continued March 2025 (fall 2024 eval)
- Placed Dec 2024

16. Rowan: Letter of Reasonable Assurance
- Continued March 2025 based on biannual report

17. Utah: Letter of Reasonable Assurance
- Granted March 2025 based on comprehensive site visit

18. Mexico: Withdrawal of accreditation
- March 2025, approved of voluntary request

Now, schools maintaining or brought back into full accreditation:
- March 2025
- PEI and Cornell, off of actions
- Interim reports: Auburn, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Purdue, Ohio, Texas A&M, Tufts, Edinburgh, Bristol, Calgary, Davis, Dublin, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Liverpool, Melbourne, Minnesota, Missouri, Montreal, Nottingham, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Virginia-Maryland, VetAgro, Western California
- Sept 2024
- Interim reports: Murdoch, Massey

And quite literally, the reports just keep going and going and going. So I'm going to stop there.

For what it's worth, Rejected, Ross and SGU have a site visit this year. Schools get to maintain their good accreditation standards in general for several years before getting dinged at their next site visit.
And the COE is composed of volunteers that have terms for 6 years at a time. I seriously considered it but there is a commitment of over 150 days in your obligation for which the only thing that is paid are your travel expenses. It does take time to go through all of these site visits and meetings. Major exemptions are obviously things like bad NAVLE scores multiple years in a row.
Quick side note- are the deficiencies in “outcomes” defined as NAVLE pass rates/student retention/attrition or like placement in jobs post grad etc..?
 
Quick side note- are the deficiencies in “outcomes” defined as NAVLE pass rates/student retention/attrition or like placement in jobs post grad etc..?

I'll have to double check later today! I'm pretty sure it's NAVLE pass rates predominantly. But I have the toddler's birthday party in a bit
 
Quick side note- are the deficiencies in “outcomes” defined as NAVLE pass rates/student retention/attrition or like placement in jobs post grad etc..?

I'll have to double check later today! I'm pretty sure it's NAVLE pass rates predominantly. But I have the toddler's birthday party in a bit
I linked the guidelines a few posts above, and the guidelines and grading rubric (pages 184-187 are what you’re interested in for this) do have points saying skill competencies and stuff must be assessed (which is probably why I had to get out those silly skill check sheets signed every rotation all those years ago). There is a question on the rubric about attrition and employment where they just explain and list corrective measures if attrition and unemployment rate rise. But I’m sure NAVLE pass rate is the biggest factor since that’s a relatively objective number all the other things are so subjective.
 
I linked the guidelines a few posts above, and the guidelines and grading rubric (pages 184-187 are what you’re interested in for this) do have points saying skill competencies and stuff must be assessed (which is probably why I had to get out those silly skill check sheets signed every rotation all those years ago). There is a question on the rubric about attrition and employment where they just explain and list corrective measures if attrition and unemployment rate rise. But I’m sure NAVLE pass rate is the biggest factor since that’s a relatively objective number all the other things are so subjective.
Thank you! Just saw the guidelines post and it’s very helpful 😋
 
Classroom sizes are only a part of the problem. The student housing was shut down because of mold in the buildings. If the student housing has mold in them do you think those are the only buildings with mold? By the way I know COE doesn’t care about student housing but my point is if those buildings have it what the chances those are the only buildings with it. I have no vendetta against the school. With the price Ross charges don’t you think students deserve buildings that are at least respectable?
You are probably right, but again, the CoE is not a building inspector. It seems you have more qualms with the idea of a university funneling funds in seemingly dumb ways than you do with the actual vet school?
 
And honestly their NAVLE pass rates are average/decent (high 80s low 90s recently when other more established schools have been lower) so they seem to be doing fine in that regard for now at least.
I would hope so, unless they changed something recently, LMU is a school that gives like 3 weeks of dedicated NAVLE study time as a part of their clinical year where completion of a NAVLE prep course as well as at least one full length practice test is required…
 
Quick side note- are the deficiencies in “outcomes” defined as NAVLE pass rates/student retention/attrition or like placement in jobs post grad etc..?
Historically NAVLE pass rate, but apparently things are changing as the AVMA is pushing towards a competency based veterinary education, so outcomes assessment will supposedly move to include ensuring schools will have metrics that look at how competent their students are in all of the domains of competency
 
Maybe students will actually be able to perform surgery upon graduation.
Definitely some schools do a better job with this than others, especially in recent years, but it really should be a more defined outcome requirement.
 
Top