DNP versus MD?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure if it changes what he states he is doing. I would be happy to listen if he has a different slant on this. The fact that he can do it and that it is accepted is what worries me. This is a profession that can prescribe medications and make medical diagnosis and treatment plans. As I have stated on allnurses I think that there is a serious lack of professionalism in some NP programs that is tolerated by nursing. I believe that there is also a lack of supervision and accountability in NP programs that is aided and abetted by the fragmented nature of NP education and NP certification. The DNP will hopefully fix some or all of this. I think that it will hopefully force the closure of some of the dodgier schools.

David Carpenter, PA-C

The distance learning program I'm in is the University of Alabama...a school with a good reputation. I'm personally a fan of distance learning and it's great for me living in another country. Granted, it's not for some people. I already have a masters in psych nursing so I'm doing a post-masters program. I can do my clinical in any county as long as it's with a physician board certified in the USA or an American trained NP. And I will have to go to UAB for a check off after the first clinical semester. Don't know about any of the other semesters yet. By the time the lawyers get through with the clinical-providing institution it's pretty much a go that they exist.

I had hoped to start my clinical last fall in the USA but everything fell through. Now, we have a clinic here at my workplace and a D.O. who recently graduated. Both she and the American embassy physician are pushing me to do the FNP so I plan to this Fall. However, both will be leaving in one more year so I might be stuck again since I plan to remain outside the USA, but hopefully not here. So, I've sent in my application for a distance learning medical anthropology program.

But I do agree that both nursing and medical education need a change.

Now, let me get back to my book on shapeshifting...
 
...What I meant in my original post is that physicians and pharmacists should be working together in the prescribing process. I have the highest regard for the education of physicians, but they don't know everything. No healthcare practitioner is an expert in every field. There is no denying that pharmacists are the authority in regard to drugs, so it only makes sense that they should be collaborating with physicians in deciding a patient's drug therapy. Of course the type of arrangement I envision is unprecedented; it would be a logistical nightmare to implement such a scheme. The fact that it's unheard of, however, does not mean that it's a bad idea. When an expert diagnostician (a physician) consults an expert in the field of pharmacology (a pharmacist) prior to ordering a particular therapy, the patient wins. And that should be our first concern...


I understood exactly what you meant...It is not a revolutionary idea (my last ER job - the PharmD actually sat in the ED docs' office (whoa taurus and tibor, relax, it'll be okay, the universe won't implode), and was consulted about meds...

let's go one step further, include the nursing staff in on the whole process...(The best codes I've encountered, the Doc and PharmD ordered the meds, PharmD mixed them, and the nursing staff administered...

This is all we've been wanting...

COLLABORATION between disciplines...

We know you run the show (NOW you can gloat, taurus and tibor)...But without each part, the whole will fail, and the patient will suffer...
 
I keep waiting for someone to address this, but they just tape dance around the issue.
It was addressed. In case you're having trouble, I've pasted it down here (and edited it to make it easier for you, since you didn't catch it the first time):
No. I intended to say that the patient has full knowledge of a meeting with a specialist, a psycologist, a child life therapist, etc. You tend to know what that person is a doctor of.

If you've been hospitalized, you tend to have an idea of who you're seeing in terms of specialists. But, when the person wanders in from the hallway after a change of shifts, it can be anyone. If they introduce themselves as "Doctor" you assume its a physician if you don't know what else they can be.
 
There was an old star trek episode where these people wore these crystal things, and based on their crystals they could be identified (I think for mating?) Anyhow, these crystals were visible to everyone, so you knew where they stood, and if it could work. It'd be great if they had these in a hospital.....

oh wait, they do, they are called ID badges! 😉

-t

ps. To not misrepresent my nerd-dom, I've see 4-5 ST episodes ever (With my fav. being some black blob one on a planet, unless that was a Twilight Zone episode, I forget).
 
ps. To not misrepresent my nerd-dom, I've see 4-5 ST episodes ever (With my fav. being some black blob one on a planet, unless that was a Twilight Zone episode, I forget).


HEY!!

Don't dis the Federation. You can say whatever you want about nurses, but Star Trek rocks. 👍 👍 :laugh:
 
There was an old star trek episode where these people wore these crystal things, and based on their crystals they could be identified (I think for mating?) Anyhow, these crystals were visible to everyone, so you knew where they stood, and if it could work. It'd be great if they had these in a hospital.....

oh wait, they do, they are called ID badges! 😉

).


Now now. Do not get too technical. Apparently Identification Badge Interpretation 101 is not taught in Medical School. 😀
 
Now now. Do not get too technical. Apparently Identification Badge Interpretation 101 is not taught in Medical School. 😀

I suppose in nursing school they have to do something in place of teaching science and medicine.



Also, im pretty sure that most patients dont go to med school
 
I suppose in nursing school they have to do something in place of teaching science and medicine.



Also, im pretty sure that most patients dont go to med school


:laugh:

Ohhh. That is just so very witty! 🙄

Now I am off to perform TT on my cat. 🙂 I'll let you know if it works. Maybe it will help the punctuation keys on your board...
 
Love the grammar smack...


good times
 
Also, im pretty sure that most patients dont go to med school

True. They have that in common with many pre-med students, such as yourself.

🙄 It's always the pre-health or professional students that talk $#!+. People commonly denounce the arrogance of physicians, but it's the pre-med students whose collective ego would shame Narcissus himself.

Before belittling those who are professionals, perhaps you should first become a professional. Finish college, enroll in medical school, and earn your medical degree. At least then your comments won't be entirely devoid of credibility.
 
You can say whatever you want about nurses, but Star Trek rocks. 👍 👍 :laugh:

So back to the topic at hand.......where does everyone see the DNP fitting in?

"My God...Bones...we must have passed...through a rip in the fabric of time. The thread has come full circle!"
250px-JamesKirkTiberious.jpg


"It's dead, Jim."
320x240.jpg



😀
 
This thread could easily dissolve into a Star Trek picture posting war. I mean look at how many series there are to post from...I'm currently watching Enterprise Season 4 from Blockbuster online [I missed the entire series d/t acupuncture school + being married to a woman with a borderline personality disorder].





Apparently, the CNS folks are also not too pleased about the DNP becoming a requirement for ANP. But what frightens me most is the idea that master's level FNP's might not get reimbursed after the DNP becomes the standard.
 
This thread could easily dissolve into a Star Trek picture posting war. I mean look at how many series there are to post from...I'm currently watching Enterprise Season 4 from Blockbuster online [I missed the entire series d/t acupuncture school + being married to a woman with a borderline personality disorder].

Apparently, the CNS folks are also not too pleased about the DNP becoming a requirement for ANP. But what frightens me most is the idea that master's level FNP's might not get reimbursed after the DNP becomes the standard.


Well people are now posting about ST & DNP.....in the same post!

:laugh:

Interesting about the reimbursement idea...I never would have thought that'd be an option.

-t
 
This thread could easily dissolve into a Star Trek picture posting war. I mean look at how many series there are to post from...I'm currently watching Enterprise Season 4 from Blockbuster online [I missed the entire series d/t acupuncture school + being married to a woman with a borderline personality disorder].





Apparently, the CNS folks are also not too pleased about the DNP becoming a requirement for ANP. But what frightens me most is the idea that master's level FNP's might not get reimbursed after the DNP becomes the standard.

A very real possibility. Medicare recently changed their billing requirements. Now not only do they not reimburse non masters NP's but the degree has to be in nursing. I would have thought they would grandfather older NP's but instead nursing chose to force out 25% of their population. I am unsure what the thought on this is. If they want to force more NP's into the doctorate then this is certainly a possiblity.

David Carpenter, PA-C
 
Okay, okay. But can we all just at least agree that Star Trek: The Next Generation trumps the original Star Trek anyday? I think that agreeing on that would at least give us a place to start at-- you know, a common ground to build on. Perhaps from there we could all hold hands and sing Kumbaya as we dance around a campfire and eat S'mores afterwards. 😀
 
Funny short skit with Patrick Stewart [probably NSFW]:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGf9Hc-KpAA




There, I'm done.


core0 said:
A very real possibility. Medicare recently changed their billing requirements. Now not only do they not reimburse non masters NP's but the degree has to be in nursing. I would have thought they would grandfather older NP's but instead nursing chose to force out 25% of their population. I am unsure what the thought on this is. If they want to force more NP's into the doctorate then this is certainly a possiblity.

This is the scary part, especially since it might be an unforseen consequence taken by a third party.
 
Air Force must pay $24.5M in baby delivery case

The Associated Press
Posted : Saturday Jun 2, 2007 16:08:37 EDT

EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill. — The federal government is being ordered to pay $24.5 million to a former Scott Air Force Base family for providing what a judge determined was substandard care in the delivery of the couple's son.
U.S. District Judge Patrick Murphy this week called the delivery of Toby Tremain in 2003 to Steve and Evelyne Tremain an "unhappy story" that led to the child being profoundly impaired by reason of cerebral palsy.
In his decision, Murphy said Air Force medical providers allowed military rank to interfere in the mother's care.
The couple's obstetrician, Dr. John Smith, warned the couple that because Evelyn Tremain was 37-years old and had had a cesarean section previously, a "midwife delivery was not appropriate." But she got one anyway, the judge said.
The midwife, Lt. Col. Shari Stone-Ulrich, was allowed to practice at St. Elizabeth's Hospital in the St. Louis suburb of Belleville under an agreement between Scott AFB and the hospital. But she had to be supervised by a physician and was limited to uncomplicated deliveries.
At the time, Stone-Ulrich was a major and superior in military rank to Smith, who was a captain. The judge determined that throughout the delivery, providers treated Stone-Ulrich as if she were a physician.
Leading up to the Tremains' delivery, there were indications that the baby's heart rate wasn't normal, the judge said, but officials still deferred to Stone-Ulrich.
Smith was eventually called in and performed surgery, finding the baby half extruded from Evelyn Tremain's uterus and into her abdominal cavity. The child was described as listless and blue and was taken to St. Louis Children's Hospital.
He survived and is now 4-years old, but the judge ruled he will never live a normal life and was entitled to the large verdict for future care.
"She got a midwife instead of a doctor," said Bruce Cook, the Tremains' attorney. "Now, the child is tragically injured."
The Tremains later moved to New Jersey.
It wasn't immediately clear whether federal attorneys will appeal the ruling.
 
Air Force must pay $24.5M in baby delivery case

The Associated Press
Posted : Saturday Jun 2, 2007 16:08:37 EDT

EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill. — The federal government is being ordered to pay $24.5 million to a former Scott Air Force Base family for providing what a judge determined was substandard care in the delivery of the couple’s son.
U.S. District Judge Patrick Murphy this week called the delivery of Toby Tremain in 2003 to Steve and Evelyne Tremain an “unhappy story” that led to the child being profoundly impaired by reason of cerebral palsy.
In his decision, Murphy said Air Force medical providers allowed military rank to interfere in the mother’s care.
The couple’s obstetrician, Dr. John Smith, warned the couple that because Evelyn Tremain was 37-years old and had had a cesarean section previously, a “midwife delivery was not appropriate.” But she got one anyway, the judge said.
The midwife, Lt. Col. Shari Stone-Ulrich, was allowed to practice at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in the St. Louis suburb of Belleville under an agreement between Scott AFB and the hospital. But she had to be supervised by a physician and was limited to uncomplicated deliveries.
At the time, Stone-Ulrich was a major and superior in military rank to Smith, who was a captain. The judge determined that throughout the delivery, providers treated Stone-Ulrich as if she were a physician.
Leading up to the Tremains’ delivery, there were indications that the baby’s heart rate wasn’t normal, the judge said, but officials still deferred to Stone-Ulrich.
Smith was eventually called in and performed surgery, finding the baby half extruded from Evelyn Tremain’s uterus and into her abdominal cavity. The child was described as listless and blue and was taken to St. Louis Children’s Hospital.
He survived and is now 4-years old, but the judge ruled he will never live a normal life and was entitled to the large verdict for future care.
“She got a midwife instead of a doctor,” said Bruce Cook, the Tremains’ attorney. “Now, the child is tragically injured.”
The Tremains later moved to New Jersey.
It wasn’t immediately clear whether federal attorneys will appeal the ruling.

I think you would have been more relevant to this thread by posting a picture of T'Pol.
 
darth_vader_closeup.jpg


"I find your lack of faith disturbing."


Sorry, Josh, but Star Wars trumps anything from Star Trek. It's one of life's truisms.
 
Ok first of all I have heard these arguments for many years. I have read various threads on this site and want to state some opinions, hope they are not taken wrong.

First a PA and NP are nowhere near the same, A PA only has 2-4 years of school and a NP has 6-8 and in most areas has to work at the BSN level for 5 years before they are able to pursue a FNP which is masters prepared.😱

No I do not think that a MD and NP are the same however with 6-8 years of school all of which is medical/nursing we are able to practice independently and do not require a physician back up in most states, yes we do like most doctors collaborate with other providers, and while we do not have a residency we are in training the whole time we are in school, I am pursuing a DNP degree and it is not to compete with a MD but to provide better care for my patients which is what all of us are supposed to be in the profession for, and while nursing school does incorporate a lot of theory classes we also have the anatomy, patho, physics, biology... etc, and to say nurses barely pass chemistry, I dont really know what programs you have looked into but the majority of nursing programs you have to graduate with at least a B in all classes.

If everyone would work together instead of thinking they are superior we would provide much better care for our patients 🙁
 
Ugh, another pre-DNP who is sorely miseducated on PA education... honestly, this crap gets old.
I won't bother to educate you. I've spent plenty of energy on this topic in many prior posts. If you're so motivated, archive my posts and educate yourself.
Lisa PA-C (oh yeah, and MS, but nobody cares about that so I never mention it)

Ok first of all I have heard these arguments for many years. I have read various threads on this site and want to state some opinions, hope they are not taken wrong.

First a PA and NP are nowhere near the same, A PA only has 2-4 years of school and a NP has 6-8 and in most areas has to work at the BSN level for 5 years before they are able to pursue a FNP which is masters prepared.😱

No I do not think that a MD and NP are the same however with 6-8 years of school all of which is medical/nursing we are able to practice independently and do not require a physician back up in most states, yes we do like most doctors collaborate with other providers, and while we do not have a residency we are in training the whole time we are in school, I am pursuing a DNP degree and it is not to compete with a MD but to provide better care for my patients which is what all of us are supposed to be in the profession for, and while nursing school does incorporate a lot of theory classes we also have the anatomy, patho, physics, biology... etc, and to say nurses barely pass chemistry, I dont really know what programs you have looked into but the majority of nursing programs you have to graduate with at least a B in all classes.

If everyone would work together instead of thinking they are superior we would provide much better care for our patients 🙁
 
First a PA and NP are nowhere near the same, A PA only has 2-4 years of school and a NP has 6-8 and in most areas has to work at the BSN level for 5 years before they are able to pursue a FNP which is masters prepared.😱

(

Personally, I think nursing needs to decide on an entry level degree before doing anything else.

PA programs turn out a consistent product, while NP programs rely on experience to make up what they lack in clinical hours...and that experience varies all over the place. While I've had extensive experience, I've never done peds yet I'm doing FNP. I don't think the peds experience I will get is going to be enough from a learning standpoint. From my own viewpoint, if I never see another kid/parent combo going "goo-goo" I will be happy, lol!

That's my 2 cents.
 
lots of stuff which shows the OP logged on and doesn't even understand how to read a thread before posting.

No I do not think that a MD and NP are the same however with 6-8 years of school all of which is medical/nursing we are able to practice independently and do not require a physician back up in most states, yes we do like most doctors collaborate :laugh:with other providers, and while we do not have a residency we are in training the whole time we are in school, I am pursuing a DNP degree and it is not to compete with a MD but to provide better care for my patients which is what all of us are supposed to be in the profession for, and while nursing school does incorporate a lot of theory classes we also have the anatomy, patho, physics, biology... etc, and to say nurses barely pass chemistry, I dont really know what programs you have looked into but the majority of nursing programs you have to graduate with at least a B in all classes.

If everyone would work together instead of thinking they are superior we would provide much better care for our patients 🙁

Yes you Doctors should continue on. Your training is clearly equivalent to those who wasted four years of medical school and three or more years of residency and fellowship when they could have taken the easy way out😀. Thank you for confirming all of Taurus' every preconception about the nursing profession.

David Carpenter, PA-C
 
Yes you Doctors should continue on. Your training is clearly equivalent to those who wasted four years of medical school and three or more years of residency and fellowship when they could have taken the easy way out😀. Thank you for confirming all of Taurus' every preconception about the nursing profession.

David Carpenter, PA-C

Freudian slip, my friend. 😉
 
Yes you Doctors should continue on. Your training is clearly equivalent to those who wasted four years of medical school and three or more years of residency and fellowship when they could have taken the easy way out😀. Thank you for confirming all of Taurus' every preconception about the nursing profession.

David Carpenter, PA-C

I consider the level of understanding for other professional health programs by both Taurus and Tallcorn as identical. Neither understand
 
I consider the level of understanding for other professional health programs by both Taurus and Tallcorn as identical. Neither understand

True but I am continuously amazed by DNP students in particular (but also PAs occasionally) that find the need to come here and without the least bit of research proclaim themselves equivalent to a physician. I would assume that they are mindlessly parrotting what they have heard in school. It is even more amazing that they do this before they have ever stood at the end of the bed and had to make a real decision about a patient.

I had no real exposure to NP education in PA school. My NP colleagues tell me that there is frequent derogatory comments in both NP and nursing programs about the superiority of nursing over medicine and the superiority of NPs. It serves the profession poorly when the students then come here and display their ignorance.

David Carpenter, PA-C
 
True but I am continuously amazed by DNP students in particular (but also PAs occasionally) that find the need to come here and without the least bit of research proclaim themselves equivalent to a physician. I would assume that they are mindlessly parrotting what they have heard in school. It is even more amazing that they do this before they have ever stood at the end of the bed and had to make a real decision about a patient.

I had no real exposure to NP education in PA school. My NP colleagues tell me that there is frequent derogatory comments in both NP and nursing programs about the superiority of nursing over medicine and the superiority of NPs. It serves the profession poorly when the students then come here and display their ignorance.

David Carpenter, PA-C

People often hear what they want to hear and say what others want to hear. I suspect there are some things nursing are better at than medicine, I would prefer these superiorities (by nursing or medicine) were demonstrated by example rather than talk. We both know numerous posters on this site who like to post their ignorance.
 
M.D. is the Gold Standard. If you want to save time, $, whatever, then go mid-level. All the rest is just political nonsense. I wanted to save time and $, so I went PA. I'm perfectly happy in doing that.🙂
 
M.D. is the Gold Standard. If you want to save time, $, whatever, then go mid-level. All the rest is just political nonsense. I wanted to save time and $, so I went PA. I'm perfectly happy in doing that.🙂
I'll take it farther. The gold standard is a residency trained BC physician. The real problems is the DNP wants independence. There are not valid studies that show the NP is capable of delivering the same health care results as a BC physician. There are numerous problems identified by nursing with the NP certification and educational processes. The solution is to move to the DNP which has independence implicit in the degree. However, there are no studies that show the DNP is any different from the NP. When the APN community can show that they can provide the same level of care as a BC physician then they should be able to claim independence.

David Carpenter, PA-C
 
I'm not a doctor. I don't want to be a doctor. I don't have penis envy. I'm perfectly happy with my six figures without call👍
 
I consider the level of understanding for other professional health programs by both Taurus and Tallcorn as identical. Neither understand

I guess people who don't agree with the nursing agenda just don't understand. 🙄 Is that what they are teaching you in school?
 
Holy moly. You people just don't have anything better to do...
 
Yes you Doctors should continue on. Your training is clearly equivalent to those who wasted four years of medical school and three or more years of residency and fellowship when they could have taken the easy way out😀. Thank you for confirming all of Taurus' every preconception about the nursing profession.

David Carpenter, PA-C

Edited. I decided to consider the source.
 
Ok first of all I have heard these arguments for many years. I have read various threads on this site and want to state some opinions, hope they are not taken wrong.

First a PA and NP are nowhere near the same, A PA only has 2-4 years of school and a NP has 6-8 and in most areas has to work at the BSN level for 5 years before they are able to pursue a FNP which is masters prepared.😱

No I do not think that a MD and NP are the same however with 6-8 years of school all of which is medical/nursing we are able to practice independently and do not require a physician back up in most states, yes we do like most doctors collaborate with other providers, and while we do not have a residency we are in training the whole time we are in school, I am pursuing a DNP degree and it is not to compete with a MD but to provide better care for my patients which is what all of us are supposed to be in the profession for, and while nursing school does incorporate a lot of theory classes we also have the anatomy, patho, physics, biology... etc, and to say nurses barely pass chemistry, I dont really know what programs you have looked into but the majority of nursing programs you have to graduate with at least a B in all classes.

If everyone would work together instead of thinking they are superior we would provide much better care for our patients 🙁

Wow, I thought Taurus was being paranoid, but I guess he was right... well, as long as you "doctors" are collaborating with real doctors so you don't kill anyone, I guess it's okay. Otherwise, make sure you stay within the scope of your practice and remember that you're not physicians. Also, your training is not superior to that of PA's, so don't start thinking that you're clinically prowess is greater than theirs.
 
Edited. I decided to consider the source.

Sarcasm mode was on😀. I just wonder about people like tallcorn. Lets see come to Studentdoctor - (umm notice the name) and use "us doctors". Either the troll was mediocre in that one or someone has been seriously brainwashed in class. At least we have Taurus trained to defend the PAs from attacks by NPs now (that was also sarcasm).

David Carpenter, PA-C
 
Sarcasm mode was on😀. I just wonder about people like tallcorn. Lets see come to Studentdoctor - (umm notice the name) and use "us doctors". Either the troll was mediocre in that one or someone has been seriously brainwashed in class. At least we have Taurus trained to defend the PAs from attacks by NPs now (that was also sarcasm).

David Carpenter, PA-C

I'll take your word for it, despite what I've read in the past both here and at allnurses (I'm there too, just have a different name).

Tallcorn, in any case, should have done a wee bit of something called "research" before he/she started bashing PAs. If you're going to criticize, you really ought to know your subject thoroughly. (Are you listening tallcorn?)
 
Ok first of all I have heard these arguments for many years. I have read various threads on this site and want to state some opinions, hope they are not taken wrong.

First a PA and NP are nowhere near the same, A PA only has 2-4 years of school and a NP has 6-8 and in most areas has to work at the BSN level for 5 years before they are able to pursue a FNP which is masters prepared.😱

No I do not think that a MD and NP are the same however with 6-8 years of school all of which is medical/nursing we are able to practice independently and do not require a physician back up in most states, yes we do like most doctors collaborate with other providers, and while we do not have a residency we are in training the whole time we are in school, I am pursuing a DNP degree and it is not to compete with a MD but to provide better care for my patients which is what all of us are supposed to be in the profession for, and while nursing school does incorporate a lot of theory classes we also have the anatomy, patho, physics, biology... etc, and to say nurses barely pass chemistry, I dont really know what programs you have looked into but the majority of nursing programs you have to graduate with at least a B in all classes.

If everyone would work together instead of thinking they are superior we would provide much better care for our patients 🙁

Tallcorn, where exactly are you pursuing your DNP? I'm having a hard time squaring your profile info with your post here. On your profile you list yourself as a "student." In your post you say you are pursuing a DNP. Are you an RN pursuing a DNP or are you someone with a master's degree in a direct entry program?

The reason I ask is, you state one of the reasons a DNP is superior is the 5 year experience requirement. So, if you're a nursing student who doesn't have even an RN yet, it's a bit disingenuous to say you're pursing a DNP at this point. If you're in a direct entry program, then where is that much vaunted 5 years of experience? You see my confusion?

Really, you shouldn't be criticizing your colleagues when you are so pitifully ignorant of how they are educated. PA education is quite rigorous, and it is not at all what you described. I don't know who mixed the Kool-Aid you drank in your nursing class, but I'd pass on it the next time they offer it to you.

If you don't learn how to work and play well with others soon, you are never going to make it, not as an RN and certainly not as an advanced practice nurse. Disrespecting your co-workers is a guaranteed way to make yourself an unemployed advanced practice nurse. (Oh, that's right, you're going to be independent. Good luck with getting referrals packing that kind of attitude.)

Don't believe everything your nursing professors tell you.

(BTW, that 5 year requirement? Where on earth did you come up with that? Cite your sources, because I've looked into many programs and haven't seen one that required 5 years of exp. as a BSN. Not a one.)
 
Ok first of all, I was not nasty and I dont expect that from someone else. I was not disrespecting PA's at all I work with a lot of PA's I was simply replying to someones statement where they were categorizing them in the same group and while doctors dont want to be categorized with midlevels we dont want to be grouped either.

I am a Nurse Practitioner, I worked as a nurse for 15 years before returning to school and the program I went to required 5 years experience as a RN or BSN. I will be starting my DNP program in January and I am looking forward to it, and I am sorry if I offended anyone that was not my intention my intention was to say we are all different and come from different backgrounds but we are all here for the patients or should be, and as far as starting my own business I have no desire, I just said that with my degree or other with a FNP it is possible whereas with a PA it is not, I am happy with my pracice and have a wonderful patient load and work well with all members of the medical field, PA"s, Physicians, nurses and all other providers and at least I was not rude.
 
I'll take your word for it, despite what I've read in the past both here and at allnurses (I'm there too, just have a different name).

Tallcorn, in any case, should have done a wee bit of something called "research" before he/she started bashing PAs. If you're going to criticize, you really ought to know your subject thoroughly. (Are you listening tallcorn?)

I think that I have been internally consistent. I have a tremendous amount of respect for the NPs that I work with. I have serious reservations about NP education and certification. This is echoed by state BONs and educators. I have even more reservations about direct entry NP programs. If NP education is based on previous nursing knowledge then how are direct entry NP programs any different than PA programs except they have less clinical and didactic hours. I have maintained this position both here and at allnurses. I am more strident here and indulge in more sarcasm since that is more the tenor of this board (it also lets me engage in more sarcasm). Over at the PA forum I have been told that I am the voice of reason at times :laugh:.

In my opinion the nurse practitioner profession will come to rue the day that they moved to the DNP. The watchword of the educational section is accessibility. The proliferation of online programs speaks to this. By moving to the DNP you increse the length of the program from 2 years part time to 4 years or so part time. There is a lot of information that especially in self paced and online programs anything over two years leads to a higher dropout rate. In the end this will lead to a sharp decrease in NP students (my opinion). Also if history repeats itself there will be a move to make DNP a requirement for medicare billing. If there is no grandfather clause then this again has the potential to disenfranchise a tremendous amount of NPs. The thing that I wonder about is what is the impetus for the DNP. It won't bring in more money. It seems more about promoting the educational part of the profession at the expense of the NPs in the workforce.

The other portion of this is the implicit in the DNP is true independence. The CRNA drive for independence has made many anesthesiologists re-evaluate their relationship with CRNAs. Similarly, locally and to some extent nationally repeated attempts to loosen NP restrictions have led some physicians to re-evaluate their relationship with NPs. The one factor that will prevent any real moves is that there are lots of need for NPPs. Also the increasing move of PAs into specialty medicine will at least temporarily leave primary care positions open. The other interesting part is the current fight for inpatient positions between ACNPs and FNPs. This will probably be eventually decided by hospital credentialing committees not nursing.

While Taurus does not represent the majority of physicians, some of the opinions he expresses exist right under the surface.

David Carpenter, PA-C
 
Odd that you chose not to disclose yourself as an NP right off the bat in your first post, and that your profile lists you as "Other Health Student."

I think you'll find some disagreement about disrespect toward PAs. But if you all get along where you work, that's wonderful.

Good luck to you in the DNP program. Where is it you're going, BTW?
 
I was not saying in my thread that NP's are docs, what I said was that we do like doctors do, we collaborate, and David I was not by any means putting down PA's I know that your training is very rigorous I work with PA's and I have worked under PA's as a nurse and I have trained PA's in clinicals.

Further I have no desire to be a doctor, I do agree that physicians have more rigorous training and have put a great deal of education into their career I am just saying that there is a place for all of us😡
 
Ok first of all, I was not nasty and I dont expect that from someone else. I was not disrespecting PA's at all I work with a lot of PA's I was simply replying to someones statement where they were categorizing them in the same group and while doctors dont want to be categorized with midlevels we dont want to be grouped either.

I am a Nurse Practitioner, I worked as a nurse for 15 years before returning to school and the program I went to required 5 years experience as a RN or BSN. I will be starting my DNP program in January and I am looking forward to it, and I am sorry if I offended anyone that was not my intention my intention was to say we are all different and come from different backgrounds but we are all here for the patients or should be, and as far as starting my own business I have no desire, I just said that with my degree or other with a FNP it is possible whereas with a PA it is not, I am happy with my pracice and have a wonderful patient load and work well with all members of the medical field, PA"s, Physicians, nurses and all other providers and at least I was not rude.

You should wander over to allnurses.com
You would find out there that there are only 12 states that an NP can practice without any physician involvement. You would find out that medicare requires physician collaboration for billing for medicare and medicaid. You would find that most NPs work for physician practices.

If you actually work in a physician practice then you have to acknowledge that 4 years of full time medical school and 3 years of full time residency provides a different level of education than NP education (and 2 years of full time physician assistant education for that matter). It is not "us doctors". In the my practice I work with the physicians as colleagues. However, I am happy to defer my medical decision making to their greater education and experience.

David Carpenter, PA-C
 
David,

Maybe you should read my last comment, I said.... Physicians education is more rigorous... I did not compare myself to the docs read the comment again, I said that we do the same things that doctors do and that is collaborate and that is what all health professionals do.

I really do not care that only 12 states allow independent practice, that is not what I want to do, while I have friends who do that and are very successful. I do think the number of states will grow dramatically. Also with a MSN you have at least 6 years college, full time, not part time, full time clinicals the whole time and with the DNP that makes 8 years, full time study, so who should research, it sounds like a lot of us should, again I know your education is rigorous I was never intending to insult anyone or belittle anyones career!!!!!🙂
 
I think that I have been internally consistent. I have a tremendous amount of respect for the NPs that I work with. I have serious reservations about NP education and certification. This is echoed by state BONs and educators. I have even more reservations about direct entry NP programs. If NP education is based on previous nursing knowledge then how are direct entry NP programs any different than PA programs except they have less clinical and didactic hours. I have maintained this position both here and at allnurses. I am more strident here and indulge in more sarcasm since that is more the tenor of this board (it also lets me engage in more sarcasm). Over at the PA forum I have been told that I am the voice of reason at times :laugh:.

In my opinion the nurse practitioner profession will come to rue the day that they moved to the DNP. The watchword of the educational section is accessibility. The proliferation of online programs speaks to this. By moving to the DNP you increse the length of the program from 2 years part time to 4 years or so part time. There is a lot of information that especially in self paced and online programs anything over two years leads to a higher dropout rate. In the end this will lead to a sharp decrease in NP students (my opinion). Also if history repeats itself there will be a move to make DNP a requirement for medicare billing. If there is no grandfather clause then this again has the potential to disenfranchise a tremendous amount of NPs. The thing that I wonder about is what is the impetus for the DNP. It won't bring in more money. It seems more about promoting the educational part of the profession at the expense of the NPs in the workforce.

The other portion of this is the implicit in the DNP is true independence. The CRNA drive for independence has made many anesthesiologists re-evaluate their relationship with CRNAs. Similarly, locally and to some extent nationally repeated attempts to loosen NP restrictions have led some physicians to re-evaluate their relationship with NPs. The one factor that will prevent any real moves is that there are lots of need for NPPs. Also the increasing move of PAs into specialty medicine will at least temporarily leave primary care positions open. The other interesting part is the current fight for inpatient positions between ACNPs and FNPs. This will probably be eventually decided by hospital credentialing committees not nursing.

While Taurus does not represent the majority of physicians, some of the opinions he expresses exist right under the surface.

David Carpenter, PA-C

You're pretty strident at allnurses, too. JMO. It's kind of a drag to have a thread where those of us interested in becoming NPs encouraging each other humming along nicely, and then you come along and throw the proverbial brick through the window. But I've come to recognize that that is your MO, and take it for what it's worth.

I'm one of those slackers or whatever you think of them, "people who take online classes." Why online? Because there is no local university for me to attend. Not everyone lives in an urban area. So, I've got to finish my BSN, which will take me about 2y, then do the NP gig. Again, online because there is no place for me locally and I'm getting tuition reimbursement. I'm being picky about which schools I'm looking at; I've already narrowed my choices down to about three programs. Would I prefer to do standard education (bricks and mortar)? Sure, but I have to work, and as I said, there's a lack of facilities to choose from. So I'm going to have to put the extra effort into it, plus hope that 22y of experience will help a little. I know I am going to have to do some learning on my own. I plan to pick the docs' brains (the nice ones) every chance I can get; take every opportunity to listen in when they're rounding with students; ask lots of questions of the residents. We are a teaching hospital, after all.

I have no desire to be an independent practitioner, but I have no desire to remain a bedside nurse for the rest of my life. It's not enough. While I'm not the smartest nurse in the world, I do know my stuff. I figure if it's something I can figure out, then there's no excuse for a doc not to know it. So I will be perfectly happy in a midlevel position, with supervision but some latitude. Pretty much the way most NPs in my area work.

I could e-mail you my #1 choice for where I want to get my NP, and I am sure you would have nothing to say that wasn't negative. I think you see nurses the way most docs do: little handmaidens who fetch for you and clean up after you, other than that, pretty useless unless they're good eye-candy. Definitely not intelligent co-workers, or, heaven forfend, "colleagues/peers." We're just not worthy.

The way people are being educated is changing. Maybe you need to accept that things aren't the way they used to be. And that change isn't always bad. The programs I'm looking at are accredited by the major organizations that govern nursing practice. I'm sure things could be improved, and will be improved, but I've worked with several highly skilled NPs (cardiology). They must be doing something right since the docs let them come to the ED, work up the pt and write the admit orders. They didn't all go to the same program, but they did have one thing in common: several years of experience as a cardiology nurse. Experience that you seem to think is irrelevant.

You and I have polar views on this matter. I have my own questions/concerns about PA education, but I don't whang on and on about it in an attempt to humiliate/embarrass someone. You, however, go on and on, like a dog with a bone. I think you'd only be happy if it was announced that across the country advanced practice licenses for nurses were null and void as of 060607 @ MN.

Physicians barely respect RNs; it's of no surprise to me that they would dislike APRNs.

What you're saying about CRNAs is not what I am seeing in my area. Perhaps these struggles are going on in more urban facilities, but where I live we couldn't function without CRNAs. Our docs seem to interact well with them, and we get pts who specifically request certain CRNAs for their surgeries.
 
You're pretty strident at allnurses, too. JMO. It's kind of a drag to have a thread where those of us interested in becoming NPs encouraging each other humming along nicely, and then you come along and throw the proverbial brick through the window. But I've come to recognize that that is your MO, and take it for what it's worth.

I'm one of those slackers or whatever you think of them, "people who take online classes." Why online? Because there is no local university for me to attend. Not everyone lives in an urban area. So, I've got to finish my BSN, which will take me about 2y, then do the NP gig. Again, online because there is no place for me locally and I'm getting tuition reimbursement. I'm being picky about which schools I'm looking at; I've already narrowed my choices down to about three programs. Would I prefer to do standard education (bricks and mortar)? Sure, but I have to work, and as I said, there's a lack of facilities to choose from. So I'm going to have to put the extra effort into it, plus hope that 22y of experience will help a little. I know I am going to have to do some learning on my own. I plan to pick the docs' brains (the nice ones) every chance I can get; take every opportunity to listen in when they're rounding with students; ask lots of questions of the residents. We are a teaching hospital, after all.

I have no desire to be an independent practitioner, but I have no desire to remain a bedside nurse for the rest of my life. It's not enough. While I'm not the smartest nurse in the world, I do know my stuff. I figure if it's something I can figure out, then there's no excuse for a doc not to know it. So I will be perfectly happy in a midlevel position, with supervision but some latitude. Pretty much the way most NPs in my area work.

I could e-mail you my #1 choice for where I want to get my NP, and I am sure you would have nothing to say that wasn't negative. I think you see nurses the way most docs do: little handmaidens who fetch for you and clean up after you, other than that, pretty useless unless they're good eye-candy. Definitely not intelligent co-workers, or, heaven forfend, "colleagues/peers." We're just not worthy.

The way people are being educated is changing. Maybe you need to accept that things aren't the way they used to be. And that change isn't always bad. The programs I'm looking at are accredited by the major organizations that govern nursing practice. I'm sure things could be improved, and will be improved, but I've worked with several highly skilled NPs (cardiology). They must be doing something right since the docs let them come to the ED, work up the pt and write the admit orders. They didn't all go to the same program, but they did have one thing in common: several years of experience as a cardiology nurse. Experience that you seem to think is irrelevant.

You and I have polar views on this matter. I have my own questions/concerns about PA education, but I don't whang on and on about it in an attempt to humiliate/embarrass someone. You, however, go on and on, like a dog with a bone. I think you'd only be happy if it was announced that across the country advanced practice licenses for nurses were null and void as of 060607 @ MN.

Physicians barely respect RNs; it's of no surprise to me that they would dislike APRNs.

What you're saying about CRNAs is not what I am seeing in my area. Perhaps these struggles are going on in more urban facilities, but where I live we couldn't function without CRNAs. Our docs seem to interact well with them, and we get pts who specifically request certain CRNAs for their surgeries.

good luck with your NP pursuit fab4:luck::luck:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top