- Joined
- Jul 25, 2010
- Messages
- 908
- Reaction score
- 72
I am not reaching. What I'm saying is, even small statistics matter. Here's another analogy. 5 black men are discriminated against. 95 are not. Do you want to do anything to stop the discrimination against those 5 black men, or should we all stop whining because it's ONLY five black men who are being discriminated against?
And people should care why someone got in. I can't believe you are making that argument. Nepotism should not get someone into medical school. The ONLY thing that should get someone into medical school is proving that you have more merit than another guy. There aren't enough spots for everyone, it's called a COMPETITION. And frankly, being a URM or socioeconomically disadvantaged person is an intangible.
You just assume that they were hurt by those statuses, but who really knows. But you can see from research experience, GPA, MCAT, volunteering, etc, that someone is more likely worthy. And I say more likely because we are back to statistics. Ad coms need to make their best educated guess as to who is a good fit for a medical school. That requires using tangible items to rank people.
And don't tell me to stop my "bitching and moaning", why the hell are you so rude? No one is trying to shut you up for having a different opinion. If you don't want disagreement with YOUR opinion, don't give YOUR opinion.
I can't believe I'm the big bad guy here for wanting merit-based admissions.
Again the only people who care about URM status are pre-meds. You don't hear talk like this going on in Allo or Osteo forums. Get your head out of your ass and see that 60 years ago Jim Crow laws and the like were systematic forms of racism that the effects of still ripple to this day. You still negated to mention board scores and the like that are merit based that are used to filter out even more people. You aren't a bad guy. Just ignorant to the battles that minorities face on a daily basis.
You say that socio-economic status shouldn't matter. Well how the hell can you study if you are worried about being evicted, having food on the table, or having the materials to study? We all know college isn't cheap, to imply that a poor kid who somehow manages a 3.4 is not as good as a rich person who cakewalks with a 3.9 thanks to tutors and I don't know books is a ridiculous implication.