- Joined
- Jun 10, 2004
- Messages
- 330
- Reaction score
- 2
i'm sitting on an acceptance at touro CA (osteopathic) and nymc. my gut feeling is that i will be more comfortable and happy at touro.
however, i am concerned about residencies. although i am sure i will change my mind several times in the next 4 years, right now i assume that i will go into internal medicine. from there, i want to keep the option open of going into a competitive fellowship like cardiology. from what people have been telling me, fellowships tend to take doctors from their own residency programs. i've been looking around, but so far i have not found an osteopathic residency in internal medicine IN CALIFORNIA that has a cardiology fellowship (maybe i am mistaken, but do all internal medicine residencies have all the possible fellowships at their hospital?) this means that i will probably have to do an allopathic residency to keep my options for fellowships open.
so, lets say i want to do an allopathic internal medicine residency at UCLA (i want to end up in cali). i hear that it is optimal to rotate through the program where u eventually want to do ur residency. however, it seems that there are a set number of rotations that u are required to do at your medical school's affiliated hospital. am i correct on this issue? so if i am required to do my internal med rotation at touro or nymc, how do people not from stanford med school ever end up at a prestigious internal med residency at stanford? is rotating through an internal medicine program not as important as it is for the more competive surgical specialties?
sorry for the rambling questions, but if anyone has any insight to the italicized questions, i would be much obliged to hear your answers, especially if u can relate it back to the while DO vs MD issue.
however, i am concerned about residencies. although i am sure i will change my mind several times in the next 4 years, right now i assume that i will go into internal medicine. from there, i want to keep the option open of going into a competitive fellowship like cardiology. from what people have been telling me, fellowships tend to take doctors from their own residency programs. i've been looking around, but so far i have not found an osteopathic residency in internal medicine IN CALIFORNIA that has a cardiology fellowship (maybe i am mistaken, but do all internal medicine residencies have all the possible fellowships at their hospital?) this means that i will probably have to do an allopathic residency to keep my options for fellowships open.
so, lets say i want to do an allopathic internal medicine residency at UCLA (i want to end up in cali). i hear that it is optimal to rotate through the program where u eventually want to do ur residency. however, it seems that there are a set number of rotations that u are required to do at your medical school's affiliated hospital. am i correct on this issue? so if i am required to do my internal med rotation at touro or nymc, how do people not from stanford med school ever end up at a prestigious internal med residency at stanford? is rotating through an internal medicine program not as important as it is for the more competive surgical specialties?
sorry for the rambling questions, but if anyone has any insight to the italicized questions, i would be much obliged to hear your answers, especially if u can relate it back to the while DO vs MD issue.