Thanks for sharing your insight on this
@Ad2b ! As you mentioned, I also think that in certain cases, no show/absence > void (ex. one knows he/she would void going into the exam). This can especially be the case for med schools that ask questions like "Have you taken the MCAT more than once?". In addition to the school mentioned in the other thread, I know UMichigan is another school that asks this question if an applicant receives an II. I'm assuming one would have to reveal the void in that situation for ethical reasons
Edit: Just a random note - I asked one of my friends who had voided the MCAT to see what it looks like on the score reporting system. The system does show the test dates and specifies whether or not it is a void or a no show (under a section called "Void/No Shows").
Okay. So there is some more insight. But AMCAS is arguing this is simply for their count purposes.
There was also talk of faculty "logging-in" somewhere...to see this type of information...But I fail to understand this.
Can people do a bit more digging into AAMC? They really cannot be saying one thing and then doing another that is in violation of official testing policies that they have us contractually signing.
I will call them again equipped perhaps with more information. I dont mind trying again next week when I grab more time and get even more specific with them. I just want concrete information on this. No one is bringing the thunder on this to really say one way or another, I wish someone on faculty would just a little bit more clear about how they see it considering the disparity in AMCAS guidelines.
Also another question - Is it common during the application cycle (whether it be secondaries or interviews) to be asked about the MCAT, specifically where you will have to reveal whether or not you have voided the MCAT?
Apparently its coming in the form of II's. But I imagine and have seen threads, and as Goro posted above, your scoring could raise questions. Anything can go in interview.
@Ad2b All of those people that already took the exam were all in the exact same boat as you said, even with 1 exam release we are unlikely to really gain any insight considering that the theme... has been very lillypad jumping... Its all over the place.
[e] This is not meant as argumentative just some food for thought, thats all
I wanted to see how and why things were being tested. If I open the new october exam those questions will be burned into my mind. Which will do nothing when I go to practice the 2 tests that will be released by the time I actually take the test

I also took similar level (not SAT) tests before and the amount of acclimation and disruption you experience is overwhelming. You cannot reproduce those conditions. People slamming doors, being cramped, earplugs in, computer desk in an uncanny position, signing in and out. I would need a warehouse or movie set to reproduce these conditions. Maybe I should sign up actually for other stupid entrance exams at the same center and void those to get acclimated to the testing center procedure (although the time intervals and so on would not be synched -_-).
I really wanted this to be my crutch for anxiety and other health problems (physical not mental). I thought this would appease that. Take the exam and void. I dont want to resort to already documented disability accommodations I received and have since quit because I was under the pretense that no one taking Step 1 would be allowed to have these type of accommodations so I sucked it up and withdrew from the university's help. I also didnt want any internal records to reflect on my state school.
Even more important, more than anything at all, is the notion that when I take that seat the pressure of the world is not on my shoulders but if something disastrous goes wrong it will be okay. I just want to know if something bad happens a void is possible. A week ago read a thread that said a proctor demanded someone sign-in when they never left or something along those lines. And everyone chiming in said u should have voided. If anything goes wrong void. On an already anxiety-ridden task my mind is trying to control all the little things that could go wrong that day. I couldn't imagine voiding an exam because someone misread a sign-in form. Now all I can think is I have really one test, one time. Anything else is open to interpretation and scrutiny. But I guess this is not very different from performing a surgery or treating a patient or taking the boards.
[e] Also just in general on this topic, a void in this manner is entirely on point with AMCAS legal and contract obligations. Its not going after people who have taken the exam and asking them what material was on the test (which I couldnt count on my fingers of the amount of people I have seen do this to my unis matriculating seniors), which we already know is against the rules. I am forking over 300$ to take a seat.
I acknowledge though in comparison to Step 1, the aptitude testing is under question here. although an argument for "not everyone can spend 300$ to take a practice-real test" is easily disputed by the exorbitant prices practice material and practice exams cost. Despite people's view that any surplus of money would not give you an edge. I would argue then that a single practice exam is going to do little to sway your score. There are bigger fish to fry. Like lying about URM. Or lying in general.