1. New SDN Article! 9 Tips for Residency Interview Success
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Download free Tapatalk for iPhone or Tapatalk for Android for your phone and follow the SDN forums with push notifications.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Hey Texans—join us for a DFW meetup! Click here to learn more.
    Dismiss Notice
Article: Residency Interviews Tapatalk Meetup
Dismiss Notice

Interview Feedback: Visit Interview Feedback to view and submit interview information.

Interviewing Masterclass: Free masterclass on interviewing from SDN and Medical College of Georgia

Does it hurt your application to take non-calculus based physics classes?

Discussion in 'Pre-Medical - MD' started by exilio, Mar 31, 2004.

Previous Thread Next Thread
Loading...
  1. exilio

    exilio Jocular Junior
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps it does not hurt, but I guess taking calc-based physics classes would help? Maybe?

    The reason I ask is because I am trying to determine how high I should go with math.

    Everyone keeps recommending to not take classes you will do poorly at..but how the hell are you supposed to know before you even take the class?

    And what physics classes are typically acceptable?

    For instance I am looking at xferring to UCLA..but they seem to offer only one non-calculus based physics class...which would mean I need two others (they are ont he quarter system). So what would qualify in lieu of taking the calc based physics classes?

    Thanks in advance.
     
    #1 exilio, Mar 31, 2004
    2. Note: SDN Members do not see this ad.

  2. nrosigh

    nrosigh
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    You don't need calculus-based physics for med school or for the mcat. An A in non-calculus physics is much better than a B in calculus physics, even though the second might be a harder accomplishment.
     
    #2 nrosigh, Mar 31, 2004
  3. funkless

    funkless Apatheist, Anestheologist
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    16
    Status:
    Medical Student
    I truly can't imagine it making a difference in your app package.

    I took non-calc physics, did well on the MCAT and got accepted to my two top choices.



    --Funkless
     
    #3 funkless, Mar 31, 2004
  4. exilio

    exilio Jocular Junior
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    #4 exilio, Mar 31, 2004
  5. 2bkiddoc

    2bkiddoc Senior Member
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    0
    at my school, they cant even tell whether it's calc based or not...

    dont take it, no one with reward you for being a toughie...
     
    #5 2bkiddoc, Mar 31, 2004
  6. Alexander99

    Alexander99 Ghetto Fabulous
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yup. Don't take calculus-based physics. I ended up making that mistake and got a few B's that would have been A's had I taken the easier variety. The problem with calc-based physics is your competition will be physics and engineer majors so it's gonna be really tough to do better than the rest of the class. The worst part is, I don't think you can tell from the transcript and class description what the difference is between the two types. That's one of the only mistakes I made in selecting my premed courses that I would change if I could.
     
    #6 Alexander99, Mar 31, 2004
  7. exilio

    exilio Jocular Junior
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, I may not have a choice. Most UC schools only have calc-based physics...which basically means I am screwed.

    Because if I suck at calc, the problem is only exacerbated by having to take a calc based physics class.

    Plus if I don't take calc, it is going to limit the med schools I apply to. BUT, if I do take calc, and I get C's then I'll look even worse no matter where I apply.

    So this is definitely a damned if you do and damned if you don't kind of situation.

    :scared:
     
    #7 exilio, Mar 31, 2004
  8. quideam

    quideam Too tired to complain
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,397
    Likes Received:
    8
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    Don't take it. You won't need it. It won't help you. And they won't care.
     
    #8 quideam, Mar 31, 2004
  9. asdasd12345

    asdasd12345 Membership Revoked
    Removed

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    if your into that stuff, its kinda fun.
     
    #9 asdasd12345, Mar 31, 2004
  10. exilio

    exilio Jocular Junior
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't take what? Calc based physics?

    I don't think I have a choice. Most of the decent UC schools I am planning to transfer to, don't offer a non-calc based physics series.

    UCLA for instance has ONE non-calc physics class...I would need to take two more...and besides they have a one year of college level math req..so if I go there it would be lame not to have the calc to apply to UCLA med school...

    *sigh* :(
     
    #10 exilio, Mar 31, 2004
  11. exilio

    exilio Jocular Junior
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am sure it is...but I don't know if I am. And it is a costly question to answer.
     
    #11 exilio, Mar 31, 2004
  12. spaz

    spaz Senior Member
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    0
    are you talking about physics 10? aka "physics for poets" where gravity is -10 m/s^2. basically this is a course for humanities majors to fulfill GE requirements.

    to fulfill the premed requirements, either take the physics 1 series (for physical science and engineering majors) or the physics 6 series (for life science majors). most premeds take the 6 series.
    in terms of math, physics 1 requires math 31/32 series. physics 6 requires math 3 series.
     
    #12 spaz, Mar 31, 2004
  13. exilio

    exilio Jocular Junior
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks spaz.

    But this, I know. And that is the dilemma. I want to take non-calc bases physics classes..but it would seem I am not going to have that luxury.

    And what's wrong with physics for poets? ;)
     
    #13 exilio, Mar 31, 2004
  14. Blade28

    Blade28

    Don't think it matters. As long as you know enough for the MCAT.
     
    #14 Blade28, Mar 31, 2004
  15. UCSBMed1

    UCSBMed1 SoCal Hater
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2002
    Messages:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    1
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    Thats not true at all. I know at my alma mater, here at Davis, and as mentioned above at UCLA, all schools have a non-calculus based physics class.

    Try to look at the catalog under the prereqs for Biology majors for these physics classes. Bio majors usually are req'd. to take Physics to graduate, but the course usually omits the Calculus.
     
    #15 UCSBMed1, Mar 31, 2004
  16. Blade28

    Blade28

    I know for a fact that UCSD (where I went to school) offers non-calculus-based physics classes, since I TAed a few of them!

    There are 3 tracks: non-calculus, calculus-based, and physics-for-physics-majors.
     
    #16 Blade28, Mar 31, 2004
  17. UCLAstudent

    UCLAstudent I'm a luck dragon!
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2002
    Messages:
    5,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    UCLA does NOT offer a non-calculus-based physics series. It would be very difficult to find three non-calculus classes at UCLA. Your best bet would be to take the Physics 6 series at UCLA. All of the engineers will be taking the 1 series. The 6 series is specifically for life science majors (MIMG, MCDB, physci). I am not exceptionally good at math, and I had the same fears as you. I found the 6 series to be very doable, if you are willing to put in the work. It is watered down; definitely not as tough as what the engineers take! To take the 6 series, you need to have calculus. You should take the math 3 series (like the physics 6 series, it was designed for life science majors).

    I hope this helps. Feel free to PM me or respond here if you have additional questions. Good luck! :)
     
    #17 UCLAstudent, Mar 31, 2004
  18. UCSBMed1

    UCSBMed1 SoCal Hater
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2002
    Messages:
    1,385
    Likes Received:
    1
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    I'm sure you need calcalus for UCLA's Physics 6 series as a prereq, but did you actually use it?

    Were you integrating, and differentiating? In my Physics 6 series, we didn't, and it was very doable. I hated it, but it was manageable.
     
    #18 UCSBMed1, Mar 31, 2004
  19. exilio

    exilio Jocular Junior
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    UCLA has ONE physics class that is non-calc based and that is Physics 10.

    The Physics 1 series is for engineering majors and the Physics 6 series is for life science majors. Both series are calc based.

    And Davis does have a workaround for Physics. You take 1 qtr class, then a 2 qtr series. But they say it is not the course people typically take who are moving on to professional educations.

    UCLAstudent,
    Thank you very much for your words of encouragement. I probably will PM you because UCLA is where I would like to xfer to fro Fall 05. Or feel free to PM me with any pertinent details about all things UCLA. ;) Any info is very much appreciated.
     
    #19 exilio, Mar 31, 2004
  20. UCLAstudent

    UCLAstudent I'm a luck dragon!
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2002
    Messages:
    5,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    PMed you. :)
     
    #20 UCLAstudent, Apr 1, 2004
  21. gschl1234

    gschl1234 Senior Member
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Messages:
    1,010
    Likes Received:
    6
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    How would the adcom know whether your physics class was calc based or not based on your AMCAS?
     
    #21 gschl1234, Apr 1, 2004
  22. exilio

    exilio Jocular Junior
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    0
    One of two ways I would imagine.

    1) They just happen to be familiar with that particular school's catalog..or

    2) They actually look it up (unlikely)

    But I think it is a moot point, since UCLA offers no alternatives for physics.
     
    #22 exilio, Apr 1, 2004
  23. carrigallen

    carrigallen 16th centry dutch painter
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,542
    Likes Received:
    7
    Calc vs Non calc physics:

    No one cares. No one can even tell the difference on your transcript.
     
    #23 carrigallen, Apr 1, 2004
Previous Thread Next Thread
Loading...
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)

Share This Page