Double approach-avoidance conflict

Started by Wolfpack93
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Your forum posts follow the visibility of the forum you choose. A private plan is separate from public discussion.

Wolfpack93

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Can anyone explain this type of conflict? I've never seen double approach-avoidance and I'm not really getting a good grasp from google or the practice test it was seen in.
 
Let's say you have (2) goals. Goal #1: be forever married to a beautiful, faithful spouse. Goal #2: always have just enough of a salary to be able to be comfortable.

1. Approach-Approach conflict = both goals are appealing. If a genie says, you may pick 1 or 2, you wouldn't mind having a great spouse or having a good salary. Not a high-stress situation. It's win/win no matter what you pick.

2. Avoidant-Avoidant conflict = both options are unappealing.... For simplicity's sake, let's kind of do the opposite of #1 & #2. The genie says, either #1, you have to marry a butt-ugly, horrible jerk (stressful) or never have sufficient salary to sustain you or your family (also stressful). This is a lose/lose situation. Either way, life's going to suck.
____________

3. Aproach-Avoidant conflict = there's some good & bad in a singular goal. Let's say an individual's looking at one goal (#1). Before he says, "#1 please" to the genie, he sees some drawbacks. Imagine a guy thinking, "Sure, I get to have a smoking hot spouse. That's great... but forever!? That's a long time to be with someone.... oh man, what if she snores." It's a win some, lose some scenario for 1 goal.

4. Double Approach-Avoidant conflict = there's some good & bad for two goals. If the choice is the genie grants you #1 & #2 or nothing, you think about option #1's approach-avoidant conflict as discussed in (3) and the positive & negatives of #2 (Sure, I'll be able to survive, but what if I'd rather have some money to spend on my friends and family, too?). 2 goals & a win some, lose some scenario for both.
 
Let's say you have (2) goals. Goal #1: be forever married to a beautiful, faithful spouse. Goal #2: always have just enough of a salary to be able to be comfortable.

1. Approach-Approach conflict = both goals are appealing. If a genie says, you may pick 1 or 2, you wouldn't mind having a great spouse or having a good salary. Not a high-stress situation. It's win/win no matter what you pick.

2. Avoidant-Avoidant conflict = both options are unappealing.... For simplicity's sake, let's kind of do the opposite of #1 & #2. The genie says, either #1, you have to marry a butt-ugly, horrible jerk (stressful) or never have sufficient salary to sustain you or your family (also stressful). This is a lose/lose situation. Either way, life's going to suck.
____________

3. Aproach-Avoidant conflict = there's some good & bad in a singular goal. Let's say an individual's looking at one goal (#1). Before he says, "#1 please" to the genie, he sees some drawbacks. Imagine a guy thinking, "Sure, I get to have a smoking hot spouse. That's great... but forever!? That's a long time to be with someone.... oh man, what if she snores." It's a win some, lose some scenario for 1 goal.

4. Double Approach-Avoidant conflict = there's some good & bad for two goals. If the choice is the genie grants you #1 & #2 or nothing, you think about option #1's approach-avoidant conflict as discussed in (3) and the positive & negatives of #2 (Sure, I'll be able to survive, but what if I'd rather have some money to spend on my friends and family, too?). 2 goals & a win some, lose some scenario for both.

Awesome that makes perfect sense. Thank you for that!