- Joined
- Jan 19, 2010
- Messages
- 683
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 4,591
- Pre-Medical
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I love SDN 😎Agreed. I believe the word you're looking for is "******ed".
😀


I love SDN 😎Agreed. I believe the word you're looking for is "******ed".
😀
Was it really necessary to comment on that?
Was it really necessary to comment on that?
Was it really necessary to say 'just looks gay'?
Yes, because it's offensive
Quick question: I was in a bad accident years ago which left a nasty scar on one of my arms. For this reason, I almost always wear long sleeves in public.
In med school, when required to wear scrubs, is it acceptable to wear a long-sleeved shirt underneath? Or is it possible to buy long-sleeved scrubs?
I know that this may sound silly, but it's a real source of anxiety for me (even though I know how silly it is)
Quick question: I was in a bad accident years ago which left a nasty scar on one of my arms. For this reason, I almost always wear long sleeves in public.
In med school, when required to wear scrubs, is it acceptable to wear a long-sleeved shirt underneath? Or is it possible to buy long-sleeved scrubs?
I know that this may sound silly, but it's a real source of anxiety for me (even though I know how silly it is)
It wasn't used in its correct context and made no sense. It was used as an inflammatory and homophobic comment.lol it's just a word
Yes, because that's exactly how it looked, maybe you had to be there to see it but whatever.
Certain words have their negative/positive connotations because people purposely and continually treat them with kid gloves. Maybe if people stop worrying so much about words, they'll lose their "offensive" or "rude" qualities and maybe in 20 years people might stop using them in certain contexts. Furthermore, if you want to start being all sensitive/PC about word usage, why isn't there an outcry over "******ed" what about the connotation towards mentally handicapped people? Be fair and be offended by all negative words not just the ones you feel are bad. Alright word nazis (oh my God, am I making fun of the Jews now and denying the Holocaust?) I'll catch you fools later.
It wasn't used in its correct context and made no sense. It was used as an inflammatory and homophobic comment.
No, it wasn't something you had to be there for. It doesn't make sense and you simply used the word as a way to be offensive or funny, but it wasn't. How does wearing something in the wrong environment make them "gay"? Isn't the stereotype that homosexuals have a strong fashion sense, so how does wearing scrubs make him "gay"? A person's actions and lifestyle is what makes them gay, not their choice of clothes. Did he make out with another guy at the gym? Or did you feel uncomfortable because you were checking out a male at the gym for some reason? Otherwise, none of us here see what made him "gay" but maybe you can enlighten us.
There is a subtle difference with the example you cite with the word "******ed" but the reason why they are offensive remains the same. "******ed" is a classical medical term and "gay" is an acceptable term for homosexuals. They are offensive when people use them in their improper context and in a harassing manner. You clearly used it instead of saying he looked bad or dressed out of place, so you're implying a different definition to the word and using it in a harmful manner. Words have literal and symbolic meaning, so simply using them or "taking off the kids gloves" doesn't change that. Similarly, racial epithets are still offensive, no matter how ubiquitous someone tries to make them.
It wasn't used in its correct context and made no sense. It was used as an inflammatory and homophobic comment.
No, it wasn't something you had to be there for. It doesn't make sense and you simply used the word as a way to be offensive or funny, but it wasn't. How does wearing something in the wrong environment make them "gay"? Isn't the stereotype that homosexuals have a strong fashion sense, so how does wearing scrubs make him "gay"? A person's actions and lifestyle is what makes them gay, not their choice of clothes. Did he make out with another guy at the gym? Or did you feel uncomfortable because you were checking out a male at the gym for some reason? Otherwise, none of us here see what made him "gay" but maybe you can enlighten us.
There is a subtle difference with the example you cite with the word "******ed" but the reason why they are offensive remains the same. "******ed" is a classical medical term and "gay" is an acceptable term for homosexuals. They are offensive when people use them in their improper context and in a harassing manner. You clearly used it instead of saying he looked bad or dressed out of place, so you're implying a different definition to the word and using it in a harmful manner. Words have literal and symbolic meaning, so simply using them or "taking off the kids gloves" doesn't change that. Similarly, racial epithets are still offensive, no matter how ubiquitous someone tries to make them.
cool story bro
Don't be gay. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
May be ignorant, but at least you're a Seinfeld fan.
It wasn't used in its correct context and made no sense. It was used as an inflammatory and homophobic comment.
No, it wasn't something you had to be there for. It doesn't make sense and you simply used the word as a way to be offensive or funny, but it wasn't. How does wearing something in the wrong environment make them "gay"? Isn't the stereotype that homosexuals have a strong fashion sense, so how does wearing scrubs make him "gay"? A person's actions and lifestyle is what makes them gay, not their choice of clothes. Did he make out with another guy at the gym? Or did you feel uncomfortable because you were checking out a male at the gym for some reason? Otherwise, none of us here see what made him "gay" but maybe you can enlighten us.
There is a subtle difference with the example you cite with the word "******ed" but the reason why they are offensive remains the same. "******ed" is a classical medical term and "gay" is an acceptable term for homosexuals. They are offensive when people use them in their improper context and in a harassing manner. You clearly used it instead of saying he looked bad or dressed out of place, so you're implying a different definition to the word and using it in a harmful manner. Words have literal and symbolic meaning, so simply using them or "taking off the kids gloves" doesn't change that. Similarly, racial epithets are still offensive, no matter how ubiquitous someone tries to make them.
