"Dubious aspects of osteopathy" - very interesting

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
This article gets posted once in a while. There's a few long threads on it
 
Members don't see this ad :)
i was gonna say, its a bit dated innit?
 
Barrett is a known blowhard. Don't let him bother you.

He uses two very poor examples to brush the entire profession in a negative light. Cranial probably should be removed from the curriculum, sure. But the presence of cranial does not invalidate all of osteopathic education, 90% of which is identical to its allopathic counterpart.

And, where is the evidence backing his claim that more DO's promote chelation therapy than MD's? 99% of DO's that practice chelation therapy in their lifetime do it for the same reason that any MD would: treatment of arsenic poisoning.
 
Please feel free to contribute to the older open threads on this topic such as the previously posted, closing this duplicate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top