- Joined
- Oct 11, 2016
- Messages
- 1,253
- Reaction score
- 2,115
Paper in JAMA last week:
So, the whole point of the ED-ICU is to improve the care of patients that cannot get a bed in an actual ICU. What I fail to understand is, why spend money building an “ED-ICU” when you could spend the same money building more ICU beds? Is it for some reason cheaper to build an ICU in the ED? Though, I don’t see why that would be the case.
What’s the point?
Association of an Emergency Department–Based ICU With Survival and Inpatient ICU Admissions
This cohort study compares 30-day mortality and inpatient intensive care unit (ICU) admissions before and after the implementation of a novel emergency department–based ICU.
jamanetwork.com
So, the whole point of the ED-ICU is to improve the care of patients that cannot get a bed in an actual ICU. What I fail to understand is, why spend money building an “ED-ICU” when you could spend the same money building more ICU beds? Is it for some reason cheaper to build an ICU in the ED? Though, I don’t see why that would be the case.
What’s the point?