Elijah McLain

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted87051
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
This thread is devolving into emotional anecdotes instead of a rational discussion of differing opinions.

I’m very ready to admit that slavery and subsequent horrible racism in America has put blacks into a disadvantaged position in this country. I’m also totally willing to agree that we need police reform and retraining.

HOWEVER it seems that some on this thread are 100% unwilling to even give a tiny inch of their hard-line; seem to have zero empathy or willingness to see even TINY PART of another viewpoint. If we don’t 100% agree that a racist system is systemically beating down black and brown people all over this nation then:

1. We are blaming the “victims”
2. That it’s 100% the police’s fault (not 98% or 90%) if after being unjustifiably stopped/questioned, you PHYSICALLY fight them, and then it results in your serious injury or death.
3. That every outcome in society including bubble tests, poverty, gang membership, crime statistics, single family homes is 100% (again NOT 90%) predetermined by history.
4. No one has any responsibility for what they do, because they are victims, color of their skin, autism, vegetarian etc.
 
This thread is devolving into emotional anecdotes instead of a rational discussion of differing opinions.

I’m very ready to admit that slavery and subsequent horrible racism in America has put blacks into a disadvantaged position in this country. I’m also totally willing to agree that we need police reform and retraining.

HOWEVER it seems that some on this thread are 100% unwilling to even give a tiny inch of their hard-line; seem to have zero empathy or willingness to see even TINY PART of another viewpoint. If we don’t 100% agree that a racist system is systemically beating down black and brown people all over this nation then:

1. We are blaming the “victims”
2. That it’s 100% the police’s fault (not 98% or 90%) if after being unjustifiably stopped/questioned, you PHYSICALLY fight them, and then it results in your serious injury or death.
3. That every outcome in society including bubble tests, poverty, gang membership, crime statistics, single family homes is 100% (again NOT 90%) predetermined by history.
4. No one has any responsibility for what they do, because they are victims, color of their skin, autism, vegetarian etc.

thats how this country works. the future is not looking good. its either you are with us or against us! its easy to spin situations into a situation that supports your cause. reminds me of how asians as a group can be considered either underrepresented minorities, overrepresented, or not even included in minorities, depending on what roles people need asians to fulfill to support their argument.

theres zero self responsibility in this country. if you are too fat, its the doctors fault, its the advertising industries fault, its your genes fault. its never your fault.
 
This thread is devolving into emotional anecdotes instead of a rational discussion of differing opinions.

I’m very ready to admit that slavery and subsequent horrible racism in America has put blacks into a disadvantaged position in this country. I’m also totally willing to agree that we need police reform and retraining.

HOWEVER it seems that some on this thread are 100% unwilling to even give a tiny inch of their hard-line; seem to have zero empathy or willingness to see even TINY PART of another viewpoint. If we don’t 100% agree that a racist system is systemically beating down black and brown people all over this nation then:

1. We are blaming the “victims”
2. That it’s 100% the police’s fault (not 98% or 90%) if after being unjustifiably stopped/questioned, you PHYSICALLY fight them, and then it results in your serious injury or death.
3. That every outcome in society including bubble tests, poverty, gang membership, crime statistics, single family homes is 100% (again NOT 90%) predetermined by history.
4. No one has any responsibility for what they do, because they are victims, color of their skin, autism, vegetarian etc.
Elijah had absolutely no reason to be arrested. Zero reason.
I watched the first 40 minutes or so of the video where one of the cops was asking something to the effect of “he didn’t do anything, or hurt anyone?” In other words you can tell he’s a little puzzled as to why Elijah is on the ground being arrested. I quoted the exact on one of the earlier pages here but too lazy to look it up so my quote above is not exactly accurate but you get the jest.

100% they should have just talked to him and found out what he was up to, looked him up on their computer, found no records or warrants and let him go home like he was asking and begging and pleading later on.

100% those cops should never have touched him or attempted to arrest him simply because he was reported as “Suspicious”.

He fought because he was scared and didn’t do anything wrong and didn’t want to go to jail. Jail is a scary place especially for a scrawny, nerdy kid.

So yeah, please let’s not blame innocent Elijah on this one.

This case is very much unlike any other case we have ever talked about on here. Ever. This is literally one of the most innocent kids in the world who ended up dead.

And yeah, I am the one who said that to me, this is even worse than the Floyd case because people love to jump all over Floyd’s criminal past. They are both horrible.
 
Last edited:
Agreed on most of both your points.

However, getting “revenge” or justice for being roughed up and spending the night or two or three in jail is not easy.

Getting justice for being wrongfully arrested and convicted is even more difficult.

Jail is not fun. Jail is not a hotel. People get killed and hurt and neglected in jail. There is a reason people don’t want to hang out in jail.
I'm of the opinion that jail holding is definitely safer than fighting a group of cops on the side of the road, but we all make our choices when faced with a bad situation
 
I'm of the opinion that jail holding is definitely safer than fighting a group of cops on the side of the road, but we all make our choices when faced with a bad situation
You been to jail before? Maybe you have and had a good experience.
I have family who’s been in jail for tickets that turned into warrants. They told me it wasn’t fun.
When you are someone who may have heard about bad jail experience you may want to take your chances .
And with his level of autism it looks like he freaked the hell out when people approached his personal space Unwelcome.
He made a fateful choice that day unfortunately.
But he should never have been given that choice in the first place if the police had not gotten crazy and aggressive with him. They could have just as easily walked beside him as they asked him questions.
I have actually experienced that when I was high as a kite. The cop didn’t come to me aggressively and tell me to stop for questioning. Even though I wasn’t acting right. He just sat there and tried to coax me to go downtown with him.

Why couldn’t these cops do that?
 
Last edited:
Elijah had absolutely no reason to be arrested. Zero reason.
I watched the first 40 minutes or so of the video where one of the cops was asking something to the effect of “he didn’t do anything, or hurt anyone?” In other words you can tell he’s a little puzzled as to why Elijah is on the ground being arrested. I quoted the exact on one of the earlier pages here but too lazy to look it up so my quote above is not exactly accurate but you get the jest.

100% they should have just talked to him and found out what he was up to, looked him up on their computer, found to records or warrants and let him go home like he was asking and begging and pleading later on.

100% those cops should never have touched him or attempted to arrest him simply because he was reported as “Suspicious”.

He fought because he was scared and didn’t do anything wrong and didn’t want to go to jail. Jail is a scary place especially for a scrawny, nerdy kid.

So yeah, please let’s not blame innocent Elijah on this one.

This case is very much unlike any other case we have ever talked about on here. Ever. This is literally the one of most innocent kids in the world who ended up dead.

And yeah, I am the one who said that to me, this is even worse than the Floyd case because people love to jump all over Floyd’s criminal past. They are both horrible.

sure I agree largely that he shouldn’t have been arrested and definitely didn’t deserve to die.

fighting the cops over being cuffed though is a large and direct contributor to his death. The cops are authority figures and like it or not, the consequences of fighting them (rightly or wrongly) carries a lot of risk.

If you want to say the cops were 80% responsible for this (or the Rayshard situation) and 100% responsible for Floyd then fine, I could consider that argument. 100% for all those situations — nope, they are not the same.
 
have you?

are you saying fighting 4 on 1 when the 4 have guns is safer than jail?
I have been invited but politely declined.

What I am saying is, it never should have gotten that far to the point where the cops put their hands on him. And this is an autistic kid who values his personal space and freaks out when people invade it and was scared as hell I am sure because he knew he did nothing wrong.
Fight, or flight, or sit like a duck. Everyone behaves differently in the heat of the moment.
What you are doing is called victim blaming.
An innocent victim got himself killed by being scared and fighting. That’s your stance?
 
You been to jail before? Maybe you have and had a good experience.
I have family who’s been in jail for tickets that turned into warrants. They told me it wasn’t fun.
When you are someone who may have heard about bad jail experience you may want to take your chances .
And with his level of autism it looks like he freaked the hell out when people approached his personal space Unwelcome.
He made a fateful choice that day unfortunately.
But he should never have been given that choice in the first place if the police had not gotten crazy and aggressive with him. They could have just as easily walked beside him as they asked him questions.
I have actually experienced that when I was high as a kite. The cop didn’t come to me aggressively and tell me to stop for questioning. Even though I wasn’t acting right. He just sat there and tried to coax me to go downtown with him.

Why couldn’t these cops do that?
Again you seem to be thinking that I justify the cops actions because I say there are ways one can behave that influence the odds of being hurt by a cop....that’s not happening here
 
sure I agree largely that he shouldn’t have been arrested and definitely didn’t deserve to die.

fighting the cops over being cuffed though is a large and direct contributor to his death. The cops are authority figures and like it or not, the consequences of fighting them (rightly or wrongly) carries a lot of risk.

If you want to say the cops were 80% responsible for this (or the Rayshard situation) and 100% responsible for Floyd then fine, I could consider that argument. 100% for all those situations — nope, they are not the same.
You putting worlds in my mouth. I was asked specifically about Elijah and was responding as so.
You people and all your “all” or “none” arguments.
 
I have been invited but politely declined.

What I am saying is, it never should have gotten that far to the point where the cops put their hands on him. And this is an autistic kid who values his personal space and freaks out when people invade it and was scared as hell I am sure because he knew he did nothing wrong.
Fight, or flight, or sit like a duck. Everyone behaves differently in the heat of the moment.
What you are doing is called victim blaming.
An innocent victim got himself killed by being scared and fighting. That’s your stance?
I think there is a policy flaw in implying anyone who is scared of cops gets to fight them when detained.
 
Again you seem to be thinking that I justify the cops actions because I say there are ways one can behave that influence the odds of being hurt by a cop....that’s not happening here
He was autistic. And innocent. We are talking of this specific situation here.
 
He was autistic. And innocent. We are talking of this specific situation here.

except you and others apply the same logic to other situations like the Rayshard one. He was dui and not autistic. Then we can go one step further about the 2 recent stories about running from the cops and refusing to show hands to get out of a car (both with guns retrieved).... again with massive BLM protests.

where is the line? Only if actively shooting?
 
The point is that cops are going to make bad arrests forever. We can and SHOULD try to improve that situation but it won’t ever be zero — and citizens should fight those bad arrests in court not with their fists (and the cops tasers). Resisting arrest IS a crime, whether or not you were doing something criminal before. Just cause the cops aren’t following the law, doesn’t mean you get to break it as well.
 
8 pages later, back to the same thing, victim blaming.
Like I said from the beginning if people see this case and don't think there's anything wrong with the police force then nothing will ever change.
He should be alive today and the only reason he isn't is because of the cops.
The police weren't told he was committing a crime, the police didn't see him committing a crime.
They had zero reason to detain him, none.
I'm sure many of us have seen people displaying weird behavior on the street. Why is it cop's instinct to put their hands on someone? Is that what you do when you see someone behaving weird? And as an authority figure they should 1) know the law that they had no reason to detain him and 2) common sense tells you that escalating a situation by putting your hands on someone who isn't committing a crime is idiotic.
Americans love to talk about freedom, but this certainly isn't that.
 
The point is that cops are going to make bad arrests forever. We can and SHOULD try to improve that situation but it won’t ever be zero — and citizens should fight those bad arrests in court not with their fists (and the cops tasers). Resisting arrest IS a crime, whether or not you were doing something criminal before. Just cause the cops aren’t following the law, doesn’t mean you get to break it as well.

Elijah wasn't under arrest.
 
meanwhile in nyc, crime units have been disbanded. police funding has been directed away. and gun violence/violent crime has shot up. dont think this is the result people were hoping for.

furthermore, gun violence has little to debate on. a regular citizen having a gun on you is illegal in nyc. this isnt like a speeding ticket, or an arrest for weed. im curious of the statistics of who these people are thats commiting the crime, and an analysis of that. that would be interesting to see.
 
8 pages later, back to the same thing, victim blaming.
Like I said from the beginning if people see this case and don't think there's anything wrong with the police force then nothing will ever change.
He should be alive today and the only reason he isn't is because of the cops.
The police weren't told he was committing a crime, the police didn't see him committing a crime.
They had zero reason to detain him, none.
I'm sure many of us have seen people displaying weird behavior on the street. Why is it cop's instinct to put their hands on someone? Is that what you do when you see someone behaving weird? And as an authority figure they should 1) know the law that they had no reason to detain him and 2) common sense tells you that escalating a situation by putting your hands on someone who isn't committing a crime is idiotic.
Americans love to talk about freedom, but this certainly isn't that.

and because you (or the BLM movement) has decided to label someone a victim there are no longer any shades of grey in the situation any longer? Floyd = Rayshard = Elijah, any questioning of the differences in these situations means you are a “victim-blamer,” argument over....
 
Why is it cop's instinct to put their hands on someone? Is that what you do when you see someone behaving weird?

See, THIS is where you contort the truth for your narrative. The cops did NOT put their hands on Elijah cause he was acting weird, and you KNOW that. It’s cops instinct to put their hands on someone who has been told to stop and that person shows no intention of stopping. You are fully aware that the cops put their hands on him because they told him to stop and he refused and was trying to get away from them. Not because he was innocent and acting weird. Not because he was black. But because he was told to stop and he refused and was trying to get away from them and yelling leave me alone, I’m going home.

You can keep trying to imply that he was sitting on the corner minding his own business, but we all know that’s not true.

Doctalaughs is right completely. You guys won’t even concede one inch or place 1% of accountability on anyone other than the cops, and that’s why we never get anywhere with these discussions. I’ve fully conceded that cops have different interactions with different groups of people. I’ve conceded that police are too aggressive in general and many policies should be looked at and potentially changed. I’ve agreed the cops in Elijahs case should’ve of been able to cuff him and have that be the end of it, and not involve EMS and massive doses of ketamine, and that Elijah would still be alive if that had been the case.

But y’all won’t give an inch. As was already said, it’s ‘you are either 100% with us, or your 100% against us.’ It’s that mentality that causes certain movements to eat their own, cancelling even the most woke people among their ranks.

I’ll repeat it again cause it’s such an important point. If you scream racism at everything under the sun, it becomes meaningless, and you lose the opportunity to raise real awareness and bring real change when real racism is actually present.

I can be with you when it’s George Floyd and Ahmaud Arbery, and I can be with you with certain parts of the Elijah McClain case. But when you try and say that every cop killing is 100% racist, and lump in cases like Michael Brown and Rayshard Brooks with George Floyd, you lose me, and lots of people like me.
 
and because you (or the BLM movement) has decided to label someone a victim there are no longer any shades of grey in the situation any longer? Floyd = Rayshard = Elijah, any questioning of the differences in these situations means you are a “victim-blamer,” argument over....

I’m not sure what this means. I’m talking about Elijah. He wasn’t arrested. He wouldn’t be dead if it weren’t for the cops.

I did mention in general that yes the police treat a lot of people pretty terribly so we should all want reform. However, I said nothing about Floyd or Rayshard.

So my feelings about Elijah stand that he shouldn’t be dead today, it wasn’t his fault and really that could happen to any one of us so we should all be angry.
 
Man, I went through this whole thread (again) just to try to see things from Matty44's perspective. Here are some highlights and my thoughts on the matter (as a person of color).



I'm not sure what you were trying to argue here. Multiple times, you brought up the fact that an officer claiming Elijah was reaching for his partner's gun is evidence that a chokehold/submission was warranted, but then you say that the third option (i.e., the cop made it up) is less likely without really further qualifying that statement. I'm not sure I believe that, given that police perjury and the blue code of silence is well-documented in court opinions, news reports, scholarly literature, police reports, etc. I'm not going to do your research for you. It's not that unbelievable that a cop would make some stuff up just to body slam an innocent, 140 lbs. autistic black kid for "not complying." I'm not saying that that's what happened, but it's not as rare as you would like for it to be.



In this day and age, I'm still surprised that people still resort to this argument of "a few bad apples," conveniently forgetting the second part of the expression, "spoils the bunch," which literally and figuratively happens. The important question isn't whether or not these individual officers were "bad apples," but what systems and tools are in place that allow for (and encourage) racial discrimination. We need to be honest about the history of policing (i.e., slave patrols) and the systemic oppression of black people (Black Codes, Jim Crow Laws, etc.) that leads to the very statistics that you like to quote. We also haven't addressed the mentality of policing in general--that they are "above the law," using "fear" as an excuse to enact force, using the "warrior" mentality (a la Dave Grossman) when dealing with citizens, and again, the blue wall of silence that pervades police departments, prosecutor's offices, and courtrooms.

When George Floyd was murdered for using a counterfeit $20 bill, most people (including some police chiefs) were willing to denounce that act and call it is such, yet about 75 officers stood outside of Chauvin's home in an act of solidarity. A few bad apples, I guess.



Being intellectually honest would mean admitting that he was never actually under arrest.



The 500 mg IM dose of ketamine is a hefty dose, sure, but you can't definitively say that ketamine was the "largest culprit," especially in the context of a maximally, physically and mentally stressful interaction with the police in a kid with whatever underlying coronary artery abnormality. His death was multifactorial, and we'll leave it at that.



This is an old argument, which in America, is mostly made by white people who have never faced any sort of discrimination, and as such, proceed to claim that no such thing exists without relying on the "burden of proof" argument. It's dangerous. Racism is not a mathematical proof. The standard for evidence to meet that burden of proof is determined by context/societal standards and conventions. People of color get discriminated against by the police disproportionately compared to white people in America. Period.



I get your point, but at the same time, why does the argument have to end at whether or not black people get killed disproportionately? Data are out there about police disproportionately harrassing black people and people of color during traffic stops or while they're walking in the streets (e.g., the Stop-and-Frisk policies in NY).

I don't need you to stand by me on a mountain top and call out racism harshly and demand punishment for the racist AFTER I show you some proof of racism. I need you to acknowledge that it exists within nearly every aspect of America and is deeply engrained in its roots, rotting the system to its core. Much like the argument that it's "only a few bad cops," it's akin to attributing racism to "a few bigots." These ideologies are sustained by systems of belief/perception, stereotypes, and cultural/social practice. These ideologies influence policing in America, and that's what the riots are about. These issues are not small issues to people of color who face harassment and discrimination day in and day out. These are the actual things that drive more and more of a wedge into our society. It's hard for you to see this as a non-black person, unfortunately, as you've alluded to in your previous posts.



Rayshard Brooks, the guy who pointed a non-lethal taser at an officer from 18 feet away and was fatally shot twice in the back and buttocks, after which the officer kicked his body while he was down? The killing was not justified. Whether or not it was due to racism is a different question.



You live in the same world actually, just a different reality. This is obvious. Again, an officer's credibility is not a good argument to hang your hat on.



Kind of like how George Floyd did, or Philando Castile. These statements are nice and convenient when you are a white person in America. Even if it would have led to a different outcome in Elijah's case, it unfortunately doesn't address the aforementioned issues of police culture and systemic racism in America that leads to these kinds of things happening over and over and over again.

I can regale you with my stories of police stopping me, frisking me, handcuffing me, checking me for gang tattoos, pointing an assault rifle at me, etc., as many people of color in America can, but to what end? It starts with you, for you to be as "open-minded" as you expect others to be, and to actually understand the history and be willing to listen to people like me and believe us when we say we are suffering and have been suffering for a long time.

I want to respond to your post more fully, but I’ll do that later as it’s getting late....

But I will say I appreciate you reading my posts and really trying to understand my point of view, instead of just being insulting and demeaning like some here. I can instantly tell from your tone you’re the kind of person I’d love to sit down and talk with in person, and even though I know we wouldn’t see eye to eye, you seem like you’d be willing to have a real, honest discussion. Your post was refreshing and you definitely aren’t in the ‘100% camp’ mentioned earlier.

[emoji106]
 
Man, I went through this whole thread (again) just to try to see things from Matty44's perspective. Here are some highlights and my thoughts on the matter (as a person of color).



I'm not sure what you were trying to argue here. Multiple times, you brought up the fact that an officer claiming Elijah was reaching for his partner's gun is evidence that a chokehold/submission was warranted, but then you say that the third option (i.e., the cop made it up) is less likely without really further qualifying that statement. I'm not sure I believe that, given that police perjury and the blue code of silence is well-documented in court opinions, news reports, scholarly literature, police reports, etc. I'm not going to do your research for you. It's not that unbelievable that a cop would make some stuff up just to body slam an innocent, 140 lbs. autistic black kid for "not complying." I'm not saying that that's what happened, but it's not as rare as you would like for it to be.



In this day and age, I'm still surprised that people still resort to this argument of "a few bad apples," conveniently forgetting the second part of the expression, "spoils the bunch," which literally and figuratively happens. The important question isn't whether or not these individual officers were "bad apples," but what systems and tools are in place that allow for (and encourage) racial discrimination. We need to be honest about the history of policing (i.e., slave patrols) and the systemic oppression of black people (Black Codes, Jim Crow Laws, etc.) that leads to the very statistics that you like to quote. We also haven't addressed the mentality of policing in general--that they are "above the law," using "fear" as an excuse to enact force, using the "warrior" mentality (a la Dave Grossman) when dealing with citizens, and again, the blue wall of silence that pervades police departments, prosecutor's offices, and courtrooms.

When George Floyd was murdered for using a counterfeit $20 bill, most people (including some police chiefs) were willing to denounce that act and call it is such, yet about 75 officers stood outside of Chauvin's home in an act of solidarity. A few bad apples, I guess.



Being intellectually honest would mean admitting that he was never actually under arrest.



The 500 mg IM dose of ketamine is a hefty dose, sure, but you can't definitively say that ketamine was the "largest culprit," especially in the context of a maximally, physically and mentally stressful interaction with the police in a kid with whatever underlying coronary artery abnormality. His death was multifactorial, and we'll leave it at that.



This is an old argument, which in America, is mostly made by white people who have never faced any sort of discrimination, and as such, proceed to claim that no such thing exists without relying on the "burden of proof" argument. It's dangerous. Racism is not a mathematical proof. The standard for evidence to meet that burden of proof is determined by context/societal standards and conventions. People of color get discriminated against by the police disproportionately compared to white people in America. Period.



I get your point, but at the same time, why does the argument have to end at whether or not black people get killed disproportionately? Data are out there about police disproportionately harrassing black people and people of color during traffic stops or while they're walking in the streets (e.g., the Stop-and-Frisk policies in NY).

I don't need you to stand by me on a mountain top and call out racism harshly and demand punishment for the racist AFTER I show you some proof of racism. I need you to acknowledge that it exists within nearly every aspect of America and is deeply engrained in its roots, rotting the system to its core. Much like the argument that it's "only a few bad cops," it's akin to attributing racism to "a few bigots." These ideologies are sustained by systems of belief/perception, stereotypes, and cultural/social practice. These ideologies influence policing in America, and that's what the riots are about. These issues are not small issues to people of color who face harassment and discrimination day in and day out. These are the actual things that drive more and more of a wedge into our society. It's hard for you to see this as a non-black person, unfortunately, as you've alluded to in your previous posts.



Rayshard Brooks, the guy who pointed a non-lethal taser at an officer from 18 feet away and was fatally shot twice in the back and buttocks, after which the officer kicked his body while he was down? The killing was not justified. Whether or not it was due to racism is a different question.



You live in the same world actually, just a different reality. This is obvious. Again, an officer's credibility is not a good argument to hang your hat on.



Kind of like how George Floyd did, or Philando Castile. These statements are nice and convenient when you are a white person in America. Even if it would have led to a different outcome in Elijah's case, it unfortunately doesn't address the aforementioned issues of police culture and systemic racism in America that leads to these kinds of things happening over and over and over again.

I can regale you with my stories of police stopping me, frisking me, handcuffing me, checking me for gang tattoos, pointing an assault rifle at me, etc., as many people of color in America can, but to what end? It starts with you, for you to be as "open-minded" as you expect others to be, and to actually understand the history and be willing to listen to people like me and believe us when we say we are suffering and have been suffering for a long time.

Just an absolute tour de force of a post.

I want to respond to your post more fully, but I’ll do that later as it’s getting late....

But I will say I appreciate you reading my posts and really trying to understand my point of view, instead of just being insulting and demeaning like some here. I can instantly tell from your tone you’re the kind of person I’d love to sit down and talk with in person, and even though I know we wouldn’t see eye to eye, you seem like you’d be willing to have a real, honest discussion. Your post was refreshing and you definitely aren’t in the ‘100% camp’ mentioned earlier.

[emoji106]

Dude, did you even read what he wrote? If anything - and he can correct me if I’m wrong - my impression is he is 120% supportive of the notion that the vast, vast, vast majority of the blame for unarmed black shootings falls with the police, and 1000% supportive of the current calls to reform police in this country because the police in the US have never fully been able to separate themselves from the deep-seated legacy of racism from which they were formed. He said many of the same things that have already been mentioned in this thread- just much more eloquently and more diplomatically (aka treating you like the snowflake you are and being nice cause I’m sure he’s not aware of your insane trolling from the now-defunct trump thread)
 
Last edited:


[

above video appearing all over social media


Other than the few select, sickening deaths caught on tape, I’m pretty sure a movie studio couldn’t make a contrived, fictional short film that highlights the need for reforming racist police departments better than the video in your post.
 
Other than the few select, sickening deaths caught on tape, I’m pretty sure a movie studio couldn’t make a contrived, fictional short film that highlights the need for reforming racist police departments better than the video in your post.

actually what i got from that video is the media tries its best to push their own opinions onto viewers. video designed to sway emotions a certain way. they try to turn a complicated situation into a simple one where the fault lies 100% on the police
 
2. That it’s 100% the police’s fault (not 98% or 90%) if after being unjustifiably stopped/questioned, you PHYSICALLY fight them, and then it results in your serious injury or death.

See, there is a fundamental premise from which you frame this argument that’s specious. When you use the world “unjustifiably” in the United States, that specifically refers to the fact that an officer is violating your 4th Amendment rights by performing an unreasonable search or seizure without probable cause. It may be smart to follow an officer’s unlawful instruction many times because a large number of them are poorly trained trigger-happy wannabe warriors with a ton of implicit bias, but exercising your rights under the Constitution and resisting an unlawful search or seizure because this is a free country is arguably what the Founders had in mind as their desire for citizens when they put pen to paper, and thus, at the end of the day, the encounter is still 100% the police’s fault. As an aside, this is why @pgg frequently argues the 2nd Amendment is so vital- because it allows us as citizens to more completely exercise the 1st and the 4th.
 
actually what i got from that video is the media tries its best to push their own opinions onto viewers. video designed to sway emotions a certain way. they try to turn a complicated situation into a simple one where the fault lies 100% on the police

Wait, in that video are you saying the homeowner.....inside his own home.....just having woken up....still wearing just boxers....is also to blame for what went down?
 
Wait, in that video are you saying the homeowner is also to blame for what went down?

I dont think blame is the best word. I didnt really watch the video with the intention of finding someone to blame but it felt like the media was trying to put it all on the police.

what i did get from the video is that i believe it's a more complicated situation than the media is portraying it to be. Certain things can definitely be improved from both sides. I dont think this is 100% or 0, all or nothing in terms of blame.


Honestly i think in some ways we as doctors can relate to some police officers in the way the media portrays us. When something goes wrong, the media will 100% get the 'victim'/patient's side or patients family's side , and all you get is blame for the doctor. People make their minds from the story with limited information, and we never find out what happens in court most of the time. When in reality as doctors we know how some complications , despite rare, can happen even if we do everything correctly, or there may be patient factors that increased risk (eg difficult anatomy, certain medical conditions) that the media will for sure not mention.
 
Last edited:
I dont think blame is the best word. I didnt really watch the video with the intention of finding someone to blame but it felt like the media was trying to put it all on the police.

what i did get from the video is that i believe it's a more complicated situation than the media is portraying it to be. Certain things can definitely be improved from both sides. I dont think this is 100% or 0, all or nothing in terms of blame.

Certain things can be improved from both sides? ROFL, that’s nonsense, and it’s not more complicated than you think it is.


You just need to ask yourself four questions:

1. What law did the homeowner break?

2. Did the police make any reasonable attempt at all to identify the owner of the property (after he voluntarily disarmed himself inside his own home) before escalating further, calling in 5 more goons, and handcuffing him?

3. Did the police notify the homeowner, after he states he has ID, of a charge or how they could possibly still have probable cause of an intrusion before taking him handcuffed out of his own home to the squad car?

4. Do many burglars break into houses wearing just boxers and with their plumbers’ a$$crack hanging out?



Seriously, know your rights man and use some common sense and things become decidedly less complicated.
 
Last edited:
See, there is a fundamental premise from which you frame this argument that’s specious. When you use the world “unjustifiably” in the United States, that specifically refers to the fact that an officer is violating your 4th Amendment rights by performing an unreasonable search or seizure without probable cause. It may be smart to follow an officer’s unlawful instruction many times because a large number of them are poorly trained trigger-happy wannabe warriors with a ton of implicit bias, but exercising your rights under the Constitution and resisting an unlawful search or seizure because this is a free country is arguably what the Founders had in mind as their desire for citizens when they put pen to paper, and thus, at the end of the day, the encounter is still 100% the police’s fault. As an aside, this is why @pgg frequently argues the 2nd Amendment is so vital- because it allows us as citizens to more completely exercise the 1st and the 4th.

Its your right to refuse search/seizure/arrest etc. and punish the lawbreaking police (through legal means) to the maximum extent possible within our system for unlawful arrest etc.

It isn’t your right to fight/assault etc when being presented with this situation. Again, them breaking the law doesn’t give you the right or justify you breaking the law.
 
Its your right to refuse search/seizure/arrest etc. and punish the lawbreaking police (through legal means) to the maximum extent possible within our system for unlawful arrest etc.

It isn’t your right to fight/assault etc when being presented with this situation. Again, them breaking the law doesn’t give you the right or justify you breaking the law.

Self-defense against an unlawful arrest or an arrest with no probable cause isn’t breaking the law, at least not in about 15 states

—-

A 2012 Georgia case illustrates the traditional rule that it’s sometimes okay to resist arrest with force. An officer had been investigating the firing of shots in or around an apartment building. Outside, he saw a young man wearing a hoodie heading for the building. The officer approached and expressed his desire to speak with the youth, who in turn muttered and kept right on his way. The officer quickened his approach; the youngster began to run toward the building. The young man ran up the stairs and eventually tripped. The officer pounced on and “arm-barred” him in order to apply handcuffs. The arrestee struggled to escape, “kicking his legs about and throwing his elbows back and forth.”

Georgia’s Court of Appeals focused on that fact that the struggle between officer and suspect occurred after the attempted arrest. To the court, the arrest for supposed obstruction had no basis. Because that arrest was unlawful, the young man “was justified in resisting the attempted arrest with all force that was reasonably necessary to do so.” (Ewumi v. State, 315 Ga. App. 656 (2012).)

It’s critical to note that one can be convicted of resisting arrest even without having committed the crime that was the basis for the arrest.
For example, in New York it’s a misdemeanor to intentionally prevent a police officer “from effecting an authorized arrest.” (N.Y. Penal Law § 205.30.) In that state, an arrest is “authorized” if the police have probable cause to believe that the suspect has broken the law, even if the suspect actually hasn’t. So, whether or not a suspect has broken the law, if the police had probable cause to arrest him and he resisted, he’s guilty of a crime. (People v. Laltoo, 801 N.Y.S.2d 591 (2005).)

On the other hand, consider the New York case of young man who fled the police. An officer received word of a burglary in progress; he arrived on scene to notice the young man and two others near a parked car. The officer and his partner approached the men and asked them what was going on; the young man ran away. The cops eventually caught and arrested him. An appeals court noted that the officers didn’t have a description of the burglary suspects or even know where, exactly, the crime occurred. They didn’t even know whether the tip about the burglary was reliable. The defendant wasn’t doing anything other than standing on the street. The court found that the officers had no basis for chasing the young man, meaning he couldn’t be guilty of resisting arrest. (In re Manuel D., 796 N.Y.S.2d 345 (2005).)

A Florida court issued a similar ruling in the case of a juvenile who loudly (and with choice language) protested police actions at an apartment complex. The police commanded him to leave the complex, where a rowdy crowd had gathered. The charge was that he resisted arrest by refusing the command. The court held that the youngster was justified in nonviolently resisting because the police didn’t have probable cause to arrest him. (J.G.D. v. State, 724 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).)

——
 
Last edited:
except you and others apply the same logic to other situations like the Rayshard one. He was dui and not autistic. Then we can go one step further about the 2 recent stories about running from the cops and refusing to show hands to get out of a car (both with guns retrieved).... again with massive BLM protests.

where is the line? Only if actively shooting?
So again, I was talking specifically about this case.
Stop lumping me with the “others”. Which others? Black and brown “others”
Are we all drone minds from one mainframe computer telling us what to think? Uniformly?
Rayshard is a totally different situation even though that could have been handled differently.
Stick to this case instead of this case.
Prove your point on this case. You have done a shoddy job so far.
Give us evidence that he deserved to be arrested at all besides he said she said “reached for your gun” stories.
 
I dont think blame is the best word. I didnt really watch the video with the intention of finding someone to blame but it felt like the media was trying to put it all on the police.

what i did get from the video is that i believe it's a more complicated situation than the media is portraying it to be. Certain things can definitely be improved from both sides. I dont think this is 100% or 0, all or nothing in terms of blame.


Honestly i think in some ways we as doctors can relate to some police officers in the way the media portrays us. When something goes wrong, the media will 100% get the 'victim'/patient's side or patients family's side , and all you get is blame for the doctor. People make their minds from the story with limited information, and we never find out what happens in court most of the time. When in reality as doctors we know how some complications , despite rare, can happen even if we do everything correctly, or there may be patient factors that increased risk (eg difficult anatomy, certain medical conditions) that the media will for sure not mention.
Do you think this would have happened to a White man? In all honesty? A white man in undies in a nice home, being harassed like that? Like he was a potential burglar?
 
And for all the people who keep saying, comply with the arrest take it up with the courts; how often have the courts put people in jail who didn’t belong?
How fair are courts to people of color? To poor people? If you think the court will always or even most often get you justice as a person of color or as a poor person (most people of color), think again.
There are people on the jury who know nothing of what you as a poor person and or a person of color goes through, and therefore cannot fathom that what you say is real and deserving of any kind of justice. Since they have never seen or experienced it.
Just like people on this board.
 
Last edited:
I dont think blame is the best word. I didnt really watch the video with the intention of finding someone to blame but it felt like the media was trying to put it all on the police.

what i did get from the video is that i believe it's a more complicated situation than the media is portraying it to be. Certain things can definitely be improved from both sides. I dont think this is 100% or 0, all or nothing in terms of blame.


Honestly i think in some ways we as doctors can relate to some police officers in the way the media portrays us. When something goes wrong, the media will 100% get the 'victim'/patient's side or patients family's side , and all you get is blame for the doctor. People make their minds from the story with limited information, and we never find out what happens in court most of the time. When in reality as doctors we know how some complications , despite rare, can happen even if we do everything correctly, or there may be patient factors that increased risk (eg difficult anatomy, certain medical conditions) that the media will for sure not mention.

So what was his “risk” factor? Sleeping in his shorts at home? That homeowner couldn’t possibly have acted better. He was calm and communicated clearly in a non threatening manner.

I’m pretty sure if I came down those stairs in my shorts, I would have gotten a, “Everything okay? Sorry to bother you sir.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:


[

above (old) video appearing all over social media

(Unless more happened after the front part of the video). He called them there (via his house alarm). From a training standpoint the main mistake was the lone officer stepping inside the house with an unknown guy to cuff him because he doesn’t know the house is cleared. The cops was actually pretty dang calm when he went hands on and guy still kept trying to turn around (that’s a very dangerous time for cops because of proximity) I don’t actually see a ton wrong there in the video i watched. I have been a custodian before and spent some time at gun point when someone set off the perimeter alarm and I didn’t know until cops showed up to clear the building. They were doing the job asked of them by a building owner that bought an alarm set to call police.

are you saying something else should have happened?
 
Certain things can be improved from both sides? ROFL, that’s nonsense, and it’s not more complicated than you think it is.


You just need to ask yourself four questions:

1. What law did the homeowner break?

2. Did the police make any reasonable attempt at all to identify the owner of the property (after he voluntarily disarmed himself inside his own home) before escalating further, calling in 5 more goons, and handcuffing him?

3. Did the police notify the homeowner, after he states he has ID, of a charge or how they could possibly still have probable cause of an intrusion before taking him handcuffed out of his own home to the squad car?

4. Do many burglars break into houses wearing just boxers and with their plumbers’ a$$crack hanging out?



Seriously, know your rights man and use some common sense and things become decidedly less complicated.
The homeowner asked the police to come clear the house with his alarm

the homeowner himself asked for more cops to show up “get your supervisor “

they have probably cause for intrusion because they got called by his actual house alarm, then they have a guy (no id on him because he has no pants) say he is the owner and they should leave. They cannot verify the guy without ID and the only way to get it is to start walking through a building they don’t know anything about in terms of who else is there. So you secure the guy you have and clear the house. That’s pretty basic security process

people who break into houses do odd things, so wearing boxers doesn’t mean you own a place.
 
Its your right to refuse search/seizure/arrest etc. and punish the lawbreaking police (through legal means) to the maximum extent possible within our system for unlawful arrest etc.

It isn’t your right to fight/assault etc when being presented with this situation. Again, them breaking the law doesn’t give you the right or justify you breaking the law.

Yes, do what they say, survive, and THEN fight them if and only if you have the money and resources to do so. #America
 
The homeowner asked the police to come clear the house with his alarm

the homeowner himself asked for more cops to show up “get your supervisor “

they have probably cause for intrusion because they got called by his actual house alarm, then they have a guy (no id on him because he has no pants) say he is the owner and they should leave. They cannot verify the guy without ID and the only way to get it is to start walking through a building they don’t know anything about in terms of who else is there. So you secure the guy you have and clear the house. That’s pretty basic security process

people who break into houses do odd things, so wearing boxers doesn’t mean you own a place.

they could've found out he owned the place if they asked him. unfortunately they didn't do so or ask for ID until he was handcuffed (i believe, from what i recall at least...)

also, he didn't call the police. he called the alarm company. the alarm company called the police. there is a difference.
 
they could've found out he owned the place if they asked him. unfortunately they didn't do so or ask for ID until he was handcuffed (i believe, from what i recall at least...)

also, he didn't call the police. he called the alarm company. the alarm company called the police. there is a difference.
Asking doesn’t get a cop anywhere, a criminal can say they own the place. You need ID which I already addressed means someone venturing into a space the cops haven’t cleared which is a bad idea.

and the guy hired an alarm company to call cops for him, he is why they showed up. Them showing up is them doing their job.
 
Asking doesn’t get a cop anywhere, a criminal can say they own the place. You need ID which I already addressed means someone venturing into a space the cops haven’t cleared which is a bad idea.

and the guy hired an alarm company to call cops for him, he is why they showed up. Them showing up is them doing their job.

home alarms go off erroneously all the time. cops don't show up all the time. and homeowners aren't removed from their own property, sans clothing with neighbors watching, every time an alarm goes off.
 
home alarms go off erroneously all the time. cops don't show up all the time. and homeowners aren't removed from their own property, sans clothing with neighbors watching, every time an alarm goes off.
I’m disinterested in trying to defend every alarm call in the country, I think that video showed pretty reasonable cops. I certainly don’t find it racial, I have been treated similarly more than once
 
I’m disinterested in trying to defend every alarm call in the country, I think that video showed pretty reasonable cops. I certainly don’t find it racial, I have been treated similarly more than once

I'd be surprised to find out you'd been removed from your home after 1) your alarm went off and 2) you called the company to say it went off erroneously. regardless, you defend what you want. I don't find it reasonable for a homeowner to be removed from his private property after having not been allowed to identify himself in a situation where cops don't even show up 99% of the time. but when they do, they can do whatever they want because they're investigating 'suspicious activity'. i simply find that system unacceptable and worthy of change. but you do you.
 
I'd be surprised to find out you'd been removed from your home after 1) your alarm went off and 2) you called the company to say it went off erroneously. regardless, you defend what you want. I don't find it reasonable for a homeowner to be removed from his private property after having not been allowed to identify himself in a situation where cops don't even show up 99% of the time. but when they do, they can do whatever they want because they're investigating 'suspicious activity'. i simply find that system unacceptable and worthy of change. but you do you.
I’ve been at gun point a couple times, you can believe what you want
 
Asking doesn’t get a cop anywhere, a criminal can say they own the place. You need ID which I already addressed means someone venturing into a space the cops haven’t cleared which is a bad idea.

and the guy hired an alarm company to call cops for him, he is why they showed up. Them showing up is them doing their job.
How long did they take to ask for ID? Why did they assume he was a burglar and not the owner?
 
Further research shows the ownerhas had alarms mistakenly go off before and all the officer did then was check his ID. But of course there would be no media of that because it went fine.

This situation is complicated by the fact that alarm went off and there's open door. The police take that as a break in and then become way more cautious. Who triggers the alarm and leaves the door open???

Police then draws gun bc he has no idea what's inside. He gives out commands but no one answers initially for few times. Then comes a guy saying he has a gun. The focus then gets shifted to a guy w a gun which he did drop upon request.

This kind of feels like people with no experience responding to open door alarms thinking they know what it's like and throws judgment on the police immediately. I can see why so many are quitting

I can also see how easily movement can be started against doctors.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom