I want to resurrect this post a bit to ask some related questions/bring up the topic. I am an R4 who will likely be pursuing general otolaryngology positions (have been considering general vs neurotology fellowship for a while). I'm training on the West Coast, originally from the intermountain west, but willing to consider a large geographical area for potential positions.
I have searched for positions that are posted on google, NEJM, JAMA, AAO-HNS, etc.; placed my information on practice link and a few other similar sites; and have begun to compile a list of practices from my home state (though I'm not married to the idea of going back). I have been trying to find good reading material to help me navigate the job search, but so far have found books published >10 years ago with mixed reviews. I did come across this short article on medscape from 2015:
Medscape: Medscape Access written by this guy (
https://www.linkedin.com/in/leighpage/) who is a writer/reporter, and not a physician. But it still seems like an interesting perspective. He states mistakes job candidates make, in his opinion, are:
- Not casting a wide enough net (geographically he means, implying you may be overlooking opportunities by being determined to go back home or to the coolest Metropolitan area)
- Not allowing plenty of time for the search
- Gravitating toward Metropolitan areas (lower compensation, generally)
- Not understanding pros and cons of employment at a hospital
- Putting too much faith in recruiters (they have incentive to prioritize the hiring practices' interests over the candidates)
- Rushing to accept the first offer
- Failling to be a good negotiator
He talks about the goal of focusing on the "quality" of a position rather than geographical location, but that is a bit nebulous and determined by the priorities of the applicant.
So far it seems the way this system is set up is that only a small fraction of available (or potentially available) positions are on these recruiters'/journals/academy websites. In my mind there is probably a range of quality of these positions in terms of initial compensation and growth potential, quality of life, livable location, and personality-compatible co-workers and staff. If I am willing to consider the entire west coast, intermountain, southwestern, great plains, and Great Lakes areas then there are an overwhelming number of potential positions and most are not currently posted because the practices are not actively searching, though they may be willing to add someone if they knew someone was interested. It is a crazy big task to search the internet for all practices in this area, and contact them and get information about the quality of these potential positions. And to my knowledge, there is no place this information is compiled, or a specialized person who would work as a "position-recruiter" for me the way that recruiters work for practices. It seems much more simple to reach out to the manageable list of practices in my home state, call them, send them my CV, and see what they have to offer. But maybe it's the millennial in me (xennial more specifically
🙂 ) and fear of missing out that there could be a higher quality position out there that I missed because I didn't consider it.
Did any of you who searched for your first position have these kinds of anxieties? I really appreciate you insight. Thanks!
Also, anybody have recommendations for good reading materials about this stuff? Specifically to learn more about pros and cons of hospital managed positions (ie Kaiser, Intermountain Healthcare, etc), large multi specialty groups, small single specialty groups.