I lurked on this thread a bunch while I was studying so I figure I should pay it forward and make a post. I got a score of 727 earlier this month when I took the EPPP. I took an alternative candidacy exam that my program offered that involved writing a paper and defending it so I was a little worried I might have gaps in my knowledge from not having taken a typical candidacy exam. However, I did teach intro psych and abnormal psych for many semesters which I think helped me a lot on this exam.
I started off studying around September with the "EPPP Fundamentals, Step One" book. I wasn't that intense about my studying and was reading it less than once a week for a few hours during some time carved out at my postdoc site for professional development. I was caught in a loop of making a ton of flashcards that I didn't really look much at at first (in the last 2 months though I made a lot of use of them). I found the book a little overwhelming for me because there was so much I didn't know.
I had some hand me down practice tests I took that I was also using at that time and reviewing answers. I didn't really get serious about studying until a couple of months before the test and even then I didn't study every day. I bought the AATBS flash cards because I felt like I was spending too much time making flash cards and that it might help to have some premade. I found overall that those cards were too wordy to use as flash cards. I used them more as a way to break down content by pulling them out and reading them one at a time when I had a spare moment. Some I did use as flashcards that were less wordy or some I modified by highlighting key parts or writing on them to make them better as flashcards.
At about 2 months before my exam I panicked because I realized how little studying I'd done and paid for a prepjet subscription. I liked how it broke down content into smaller pieces so I felt less overwhelmed. I paid for the tier with videos. The videos were okay, but not amazing. I watched maybe 1/4 of the content videos, maybe less. With prepjet I felt a little better equipped to zoom into spending more time on areas of weaknesses. I did not make it through all the material before my exam date and focused just on areas where I felt like I needed more help. After taking each practice exam I very carefully reviewed missed items and made flashcards for concepts I didn't know.
See below for my practice scores:
The "readiness score" in prepjet is nonsense IMHO. It jumped around a ton up and down from practice test to practice test. If you use prepjet don't pay attention to that metric. It caused me an undue amount of anxiety. Before taking the real test it said I was only 27% ready and clearly I passed with a huge margin.
A few days before the actual EPPP I took the PEPPO-1 and got at 605. For some reason I bombed the "Treatment, Intervention, Prevention, and Supervision" domain on that practice test and I had no idea why from my recollection of the items which concerned me since it's such as big section. So the last few days I spent focusing a ton on that area. On the actual exam I'm not sure I saw a single question related to the content I crammed in the last few days.
On the actual test there were a substantial number of items with concepts I had never seen before. I had to logic my way through a lot of items that I wasn't sure on. The questions were overall more straight forward than a lot of practice test items I had seen. For example a lot of practice test items asked me about specific ages of developmental milestones and could be nitpicky about a small difference in time, but on the actual test those kinds of questions were more set up about knowing the order of milestones or needing to know what other milestones might have been met at the same time in a way the integrated knowledge from a few areas. Basically a little more big picture than needing to know the difference between something happening at 10 vs 14 months.
Coming from a research heavy program I found the stats/research methods questions very easy. I hadn't spent much time reviewing that content and it was clearly the right call since the questions were very straight forward.
There were a lot of questions where I hadn't read the specific research finding they had referenced but had read about a research finding that was similar. There were a lot of questions I had to make educated guesses on based on that related knowledge. I think the prepjet readings helped me in this area for a lot of those cases where there were related findings that connected to a larger shared concept.
I clearly overstudied and frankly I think it's possible I might have passed if I'd taken it way earlier in my studying process or maybe without studying at all (a lot of questions hit knowledge I knew before studying). I'd encourage anyone on the fence about taking the plunge of the real exam to take the PEPPO and see how you do. I think a big thing studying did was help me feel confident to not second guess myself on easy items.
I found the highlight and cross out functions on the exam very helpful because I found on practice tests I often made careless errors from misreading questions from going too fast. Highlighting and crossing out wrong answers helped me slow myself down to avoid careless errors.
I have ADHD and had a reduced distraction room when I took the GRE. I did not request that for this exam because with covid scheduling was already complex and asking for reduced distraction gives you less scheduling options and I wasn't really super into having to ask the board for permission for the accommodation. I found the testing center very good in terms of not having distractions. They provided earplugs and headphones. I got there early so I was one of the first in the room. Since I was in a little cubicle, I didn't even have awareness that there was a person right next to me until after I was leaving the exam.