Again, I would recommend just listing it as a presentation as the oral or poster presentation.
Understood. I guess it wasn't my own presentation (but second author, the first author had presented it) and didn't feel comfortable listing it as my own presentation.
Peer reviewed publication other than published, and then there’s an option for “in press” or something like that.
1) I have no idea what such a thing is, so you would need to give us a better description of what you're talking about.
Just have publications listed on their own in ERAS. If you have multiple publications from the same lab, then you can list them all under the same experience.
Merging with dedicated megathread.
Thank you. However it was only accepted for online publication and not the actual meeting itself. Would I still put presentation?
It may not mean a ton, but sure. Still goes in as "submitted" for the actual pub
1) Technically, for a professional CV you shouldn't list the same abstract presented multiple times, and when you get further along in your career you probably wind up removing abstracts once the manuscript is published. In fact a lot of conferences won't let you present if it's already been presented elsewhere without explicit permission. All that said, for the purposes of applying to ERAS, I would probably list everything (the 2 presentations and the publication) separately just because it gives a sense of how productive you've been during med school.
I believe that I have a few abstracts that meet these criteria. I actually have two abstracts with Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research. Should I just air on the side of caution and list these as poster presentations? I do not want program directors thinking that I do not have academic integrity.
Can this rule be found anywhere officially?
I don't know that I've ever taken the time to read the OP for this thread, but I disagree--I would generally list a poster as a poster. I think what the OP said 11 years ago may be outdated, it's actually now quite common for abstracts from large academic societies to get published as a supplement.
To be clear, there are no "rules" and it's all just kind of what people think. FWIW, I also disagree with this and would say it's OK to list posters that were presented by other members of the group so long as you clearly indicate who presented.
The dirty little secret? They're not verifying everything. Because most things on your CV don't matter and are just filler. Anything that seems out of character (one 3 month research experience and you get a NEJM paper out of it for instance) will get verified, or anything that piques their interest. But it's not like someone is poring over every line in your CV trying to catch you out on something.
Yeah I agree with @gutonc , nobody has time to verify everything for each stupid line hundreds of residency applicants. In this case they can easily verify by simply asking you about the research or the presentation. It's pretty hard to completely fabricate something on your CV and not have it come across awkwardly in an interview.
Is having an *abstract* published in a supplementary journal considered more prestigious than presenting a poster at a conference? Or does it not matter?
I think they’re the same
For most the major conferences, they'll automatically publish all the posters as an abstract. For some like ASCO, the abstract publication is actually less competitive than the poster (abstracts not selected for a poster/oral will be published as an abstract only).
"Virtual"
Agree with mvenus. I say “presented virtually due to covid pandemic. Date range Of conference
one thing that makes it tricky is that eras requires you enter a country/state from a drop down list, then has a free text box for city. For now I've just made note that it was virtual and then put the location the conference was intended to be in (if scheduled then moved online) or just put my own location if it was scheduled virtually from the beginning (and doesn't have another obvious location to choose)
even if I'm not first author?
Published where? Many of these "resolutions" eventually wind up in the journal for that organization. But if you guys just drafted a resolution that stays internal, then I'm not sure that's a publication it's just part of the "activity" description.
Yes.
You can describe the activity, but if the resolution wasn't adopted that isn't a published anything. You can talk about your passion for a subject, but I'm not sure the value of saying that you drafted a resolution that wasn't adopted. It seems more like something that should just be described in your personal statement than actually serve as a line on your CV.
Under book chapters, and then explain that it's accepted without an official date of publication yet
Question-So i went to book chapters but then it has an asterisk by year of publication and its required that I click on a year. It is supposed to be published in 2022 but it wont allow me to put in a date after the current year. Do I just put 2021 and then explain somewhere about how its accepted without official date yet somwhere on the page as you had suggested?
Sure
I wouldn't count that as research. You are talking about research performed by another person. you could list it as an experience (perhaps leadership if you led them).
Nah it was just me. bummer but what I expected. hopefully it wont matter too much, I'm applying peds
Echo above, this was coursework not research. Do not list.
Assuming the default is poster, I would list as such.
