Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Yes. But this would look more legit if you have an abstract/publication for this project. If it's one of those things where you just collected data on some volunteering that your org does but don't actually have any plans to publish this data, then I think it's questionable whether that truly counts as research.
Then yes. List it in both places.
Yes.
I think you can justifiably list them as published and just put "in-press" for any information you don't yet have.
Again... yes.
It went through reviews by my faculty adviser and four other members of my committee, three of whom are experts in the field, and the other is a respected Professor of the institution (he is a director of the MD/PhD program). I went through many revisions before it was accepted to be submitted to the Digital Commons.
I see. Thanks for clarifying
Just going to echo that's not peer review. As the other user said, peer review involves someone outside your institution who doesn't have an underlying interest in your success and will just judge the work on its scientific merit. I'm not saying that your work is NOT legit or meritorious, but it hasn't gone through this peer review process.
Yes, it would be disingenuous to list something as peer-reviewed if it was not.
If there is no formal way to mark a publication as merely "submitted" then I wouldn't list it.
No to the first one. The second one can be listed as a research experience.
I think that's reasonable.
Hello can you please clarify on the difference between putting articles such as these in the others category as "in press" or putting them as published and writing instead "in-press" in the doi, volume, etc...
This is kind of the whole point of programs having a "med school research day," to let people add fluff to their CVs. But that's what it is--fluff. So you can if it's all you got, and it proves that you were able to talk about it in a semi-coherent way and weren't just playing with pipettes for a summer, but it's the bottom-of-the-barrel when it comes to a research presentation.
Yes
I think you explained the crux of your question accurately--yes, you can list those publications, but run the risk of making it more difficult to pick out the truly relevant publications that you would rather talk about in an interview setting. Really only you can say whether those undergrad publications are worth continuing to include.
It's been a while since I've used ERAS myself. If there's some sort of instruction that "in-press" articles should be listed under "Other," then do that. I don't think it really matters as long as it's clear that it's been accepted to a legit journal.
according to my advisor, yes
This is my least favorite thread of all time. And this post doesn't belong here.
Definitely not 2 peer-reviewed journal/abstract pubs. I consider it a stretch to call these abstracts that are "published" as a supplement as an actual publication at all, let alone if you have an actual separate manuscript describing the same findings. Poster+pub, and move on with your life.
Literally does not matter. I know that doesn't really answer your question, but different people will do what they personally think is best, and nobody is going to care either way, so just pick one.
Can you expand on this point or provide some context/support?
The AMA does not have your interests at heart. Unless you are on their board.
Bottom line is whether you are actually an author on any of these projects. If yes, then cite yourself. If not, then I think this is probably just part of the description for your job under employment history.
At this stage in your career, definitely yes. Later in your career probably not, but right now quantity is what's important (ie you're probably not worried about a poster where you're 4th author distracting from your NEJM paper).
Merging with an existing thread for this exact kind of question.
Thank you, this clarifies the situation perfectly!
Im pretty sure textbook/book chapters have an entry under publications. And there should be an area for awards/honors/etc.
Peer reviewed journal article. Congratulations!
Doesn't matter. I'm not sure exactly what ERAS looks like on your end, but just put in the DOI or something when it asks for that info (or leave it blank if you can). Within academia it's well-accepted that you get to add your publications to your CV as soon as they're accepted, the lag time is meaningless.
