Evaluating for ADHD?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Finish that statement though. You're saying patients who have ADHD causing dysfunction are more likely to be open to non-stimulants. So what about the patients who have ADHD causing dysfunction who aren't willing to try non-stimulants? That's where you bring in the red flag and that's what I'm pushing back on.
Then we ask why aren't they willing to try non-stimulants. Like I said, there's a difference between patients who come in wanting to try stimulants but being willing to try alternative options vs someone coming in demanding stimulants and only stimulants when it's a new diagnosis. I'm much more comfortable letting the former try stimulants if they're indicated and would question any physician's judgment who is fine just handing stimulants to someone in that latter category without serious questioning as it is absolutely a red flag.

Stimulants are first line for a reason. Treating them with non-stimulant when standard of care dictates stimulants in absence of contraindications isn't optimal treatment, regardless of your own experience.
Why so black and white? Stimulants as the first line for legit ADHD is the guideline, it is not law. EBM and guidelines are population level evidence meant as generalizations, and individual cases often require deviation from general guidelines. If everything was just algorithmic, we wouldn't be needed to assess or treat at all. Rigidity with guidelines and standards of care in fields that are as dependent on subjective accounts of symptoms as psych is just bad practice.
 
I want to add in here on what Stagg and Mass Effect are going back and forth on. There are several signs in any eval that make me less likely to go with controlled medications, and I'm aware that many of these are due to my own countertransferrence:
- insisting on using my first name after correction
- saying "I've earned" or "I'm entitled to" or "it's my right to get" or "you are being unprofessional for not giving me" the specific treatment
- sudden onset of dysfunction in a presentation that doesn't usually do that
- insidious onset of dysfunction in a presentation that doesn't usually do that
- insisting on using the phrase "panic attack" to refer to situations that, based on their description, are not panic attacks, even after psychoeducation
- emailing me or texting my office number instead of sending messages through the portal, even after repeated instruction. If the last text from me is "don't text me, message me on Osmind," then I'm usually prepping myself for the termination speech
- missing multiple appointments without warning

Unfortunately, all of these are rather prominent in the post- TikTok era. People presenting with fear they have BPD usually have all of these but, fascinatingly, low MSI-BPD scores. People presenting with ADHD that wasn't addressed in childhood are also commonly doing the above irksome things. I have to make an effort to set those frustrations aside to make sure I don't under-treat ADHD.
 
Last edited:
I want to add in here on what Stagg and Mass Effect are going back and forth on. There are several signs in any eval that make me less likely to go with controlled medications, and I'm aware that many of these are due to my own countertransferrence:
- insisting on using my first name after correction
This has never not been the reddest of red flags from my experience. r of >0.7 with NPD.
 
This has never not been the reddest of red flags from my experience. r of >0.7 with NPD.
You can even bump that r to >0.9 when they not only use your first name, but your full first name instead of a preferred name in a condescending tone (ie, calling someone "Daniel" instead of just "Dan").
 
Then we ask why aren't they willing to try non-stimulants.

So you're using wanting evidence-based first-line treatment as a litmus test as to whether or not they're worthy of evidence-based first-line treatment. Dude. Just stop.

Why so black and white? Stimulants as the first line for legit ADHD is the guideline, it is not law. EBM and guidelines are population level evidence meant as generalizations, and individual cases often require deviation from general guidelines. If everything was just algorithmic, we wouldn't be needed to assess or treat at all. Rigidity with guidelines and standards of care in fields that are as dependent on subjective accounts of symptoms as psych is just bad practice.

You ARE being algorithmic and black and white, no matter how much you convince yourself you're not. You're also being incredibly biased against this diagnosis if your inclination is "I won't provide first-line treatment unless they try second-line first". WTH kind of litmus test is that?
 
So you're using wanting evidence-based first-line treatment as a litmus test as to whether or not they're worthy of evidence-based first-line treatment. Dude. Just stop
That’s not what I’m saying at all. It’s not about gauging “worthiness”. It’s about examine their perspectives.

You ARE being algorithmic and black and white, no matter how much you convince yourself you're not. You're also being incredibly biased against this diagnosis if your inclination is "I won't provide first-line treatment unless they try second-line first". WTH kind of litmus test is that?
Again, I’m not saying that and have said differently several times.

You’ve clearly made up your mind about how you believe I practice based on cherry picking from my statements and your responses. I’ve tried to clarify but you seem to be set in your opinion on me. I’m not sure how this is productive, but I hope others are able to understand the context of my statements and I’m happy to clarify further if needed.
 
Or enacting really unfortunate and unsettling romantic/sexual transference as an attempt at being flirtatious.

Off topic, but I so don't get this, I mean I do get erotic transference in therapy is a thing, but it still makes my brain go, "Say what now?". Like I do have a functioning set of eyeballs, I can tell when the Doctor standing/sitting in front of me is an attractive person, but they're still a Doctor. Like have some decorum people. :smack:
 
I want to add in here on what Stagg and Mass Effect are going back and forth on. There are several signs in any eval that make me less likely to go with controlled medications, and I'm aware that many of these are due to my own countertransferrence:
- insisting on using my first name after correction
- saying "I've earned" or "I'm entitled to" or "it's my right to get" or "you are being unprofessional for not giving me" the specific treatment
- sudden onset of dysfunction in a presentation that doesn't usually do that
- insidious onset of dysfunction in a presentation that doesn't usually do that
- insisting on using the phrase "panic attack" to refer to situations that, based on their description, are not panic attacks, even after psychoeducation
- emailing me or texting my office number instead of sending messages through the portal, even after repeated instruction. If the last text from me is "don't text me, message me on Osmind," then I'm usually prepping myself for the termination speech
- missing multiple appointments without warning

Unfortunately, all of these are rather prominent in the post- TikTok era. People presenting with fear they have BPD usually have all of these but, fascinatingly, low MSI-BPD scores. People presenting with ADHD that wasn't addressed in childhood are also commonly doing the above irksome things. I have to make an effort to set those frustrations aside to make sure I don't under-treat ADHD.

Honestly this gives me hope, that the majority of people in the TikTok era are clearly too stupid to know how to scam pills, or they're delusional enough to think that kind of behaviour is going to get them a legitimate script. Good, more for the rest of us (medically speaking). 🙂
 
Overall....this whole thread should be an absolute embarrassment to the profession of clinical psychiatry. Vast disagreement about basic bread and butter management of the most emerging diagnosis in psychiatry in the 21st century. Personal bias. Professional bias. Training bias. Lack of training bias. Prescription liability phobia/bias. Unbelievable.

Where do we turn from here, folks? What's next?
 
Last edited:
Overall....this whole thread should be an absolute embarrassment to the profession of clinical psychiatry. Vast disagreement about basic bread and butter management of the most emerging diagnosis in psychiatry in the 21st century. Personal bias. Professional bias. Training bias. Lack of training bias. Prescription liability phobia/bias. Unbelievable.

Where do we turn from here, folks? What's next?

As someone who was diagnosed in 1975 I have watched ADHD go from a legitimate diagnosis of a neurodevelopmental disorder that can seriously mess up someone's life, to a trendy fad that can be diagnosed based on how you hold your hands when you walk or how often you bump into things, and of course it's a 'super power' nowadays as well don't you know </sarcasm>. I will always speak against outright dismissal of the disorder, but I do not blame a single one of these Doctors for their biases, or concerns with proper diagnosis, or concerns with prescription liabilities, or any other legitimate concerns that may be expressed, because I am sick to the back teeth of ADHD being treated like some cool fashion accessory. It IS overdiagnosed, and conversely I think that also means it is underdiagnosed because the legitimate cases who would actually benefit from diagnosis and treatment are getting lost in the sea of tiktok-esque noise.
 
Overall....this whole thread should be an absolute embarrassment to the profession of clinical psychiatry. Vast disagreement about basic bread and butter management of the most emerging diagnosis in psychiatry in the 21st century. Personal bias. Professional bias. Training bias. Lack of training bias. Prescription liability phobia/bias. Unbelievable.

Where do we turn from here, folks? What's next?
Disagreement is not embarrassing. We all see different patient populations and willingness to start a stimulant is vastly different depending on the setting (outpatient child v correctional v eating disorders v outpatient adult v CMH).

I certainly don’t agree with every post but have appreciated the differences of opinion and the (mostly) respectful discussion.
 
This thread is not embarrassing at all. Psychiatry, more than any other medical specialty, is done by consensus. This is how consensus is developed. You can find a citation for any perspective you would like to argue.
 
Overall....this whole thread should be an absolute embarrassment to the profession of clinical psychiatry. Vast disagreement about basic bread and butter management of the most emerging diagnosis in psychiatry in the 21st century. Personal bias. Professional bias. Training bias. Lack of training bias. Prescription liability phobia/bias. Unbelievable.

Where do we turn from here, folks? What's next?

Actually ... it's people who are rigidly self-assured of their own righteousness and infallibility, who just know that whatever opinion they have arrived at is The One Truth to Rule Them All, and who enjoy telling anyone who thinks differently or disagrees with their opinion that such disagreement proves them to be a Total Mindless Idiot - it's these people who are an absolute embarrassment to their profession, whichever one that might be.
 
A propos of nothing in particular, I have been meaning to share my experience on this thread, as a psychiatrist recently diagnosed with ADHD. However I have been very busy and since starting vyvanse I have the capacity to resist the temptation to post until time allows. Happy to see the thread is still active!

I'm a woman over 40. Completed residency 5+ years ago. I never really considered the idea that I may have ADHD until my husband was diagnosed last year.

My husband's diagnosis was initially very confusing for me, as the person who theoretically knows him best and also happens to be a psychiatrist. I didn't want to question his therapist, who seemed decent from what I could tell, and whom he'd been seeing for a couple years. But I just didn't really see it. We've been together since we were teenagers. He was the one to whom I had always delegated (usually by default-- not taking care of it myself) all manner of necessary life tasks that were too boring or tedious or required too much sustained attention for me (though I never thought of it in those terms until recently). In the early years of our relationship I am sure I would have lost my driver's license for unpaid speeding tickets, had he not been there noticing them in the foot space of my passenger seat and reminding me to take care of them. He is an entrepreneur and has always been the primary caregiver to our kids and has run the household without a whole lot of help from me. Not particularly well, mind you, (house generally a disorganized mess, rarely a home cooked meal) a source of ongoing shame for him, but better than I would do. I always tried to stay grateful and reassure him he was doing great, life is just hard with young kids. But life was perplexingly hard for us before we had kids too, and now that the kids were getting older and generally getting to be pretty self sufficient, it was STILL REALLY HARD. And I was aware that I was like a third child to him at times, with my contributing to the chaos of the household more than the running of it. My car would always be a pitted out mess, only cleaned if I knew I was going to have to give someone a ride, or if he nagged me about it enough. His vehicle he managed to keep reasonably clean so as not to embarrass the kids when he drove their friends to school. I couldn't set good a good example for the kids--they thought it was normal to always have dirty clothes strewn across the floor in all rooms of the house. I resisted my husband's attempts to get me more involved in our finances. I bought whatever I wanted and luckily didn't have extravagant tastes, so it kinda sorta worked, though his repeated attempts to get me to follow a budget frustrated both of us. I recognize in retrospect that I was so easily overwhelmed by many tasks requiring sustained attention that I would avoid them at all costs and leave him holding the bag.

When my husband was diagnosed, I thought "well bully for him, he has a reason for why things are always so hard for him and I guess I'm just a lazy, undisciplined, careless, thoughtless, slob." I was kind of jealous he seemed to have a treatable condition vs my character flaws, but I still didn't consider the diagnosis for myself. Probably in part because NOT having a mental illness, in a family where almost everyone else did, was a weirdly central part of my identity. The fact that women are expected to do all the things I routinely failed at would have reinforced shame in a lot of women. I was able to rationalize the fact that my husband was the one who (usually) remembered to buy birthday gifts for our nieces and nephews as evidence of our progressive marriage, and spare myself a lot of the shame that way by turning my deficit into a feminist win for us both.

Slowly it started to dawn on me, maybe I didn't recognize his ADHD because I had it too, and actually mine was in many ways more severe than my husband's--or maybe l just had less experience learning coping strategies to manage it, because I had relied so much on him for so long. I had never read the criteria and had them resonate with me personally. Instead I think I often didn't recognize it in adult patients because I was using my own experiences as a barometer of what's normal, and actually, I'm not normal. This has been a jarring realization that frankly has really shaken up my professional identity and has left me wondering how many patients I have seen for whom I have not been effective at diagnosing or treating ADHD.

Practice patterns varied in my residency program around diagnosing and treating ADHD in adults, but the attendings I most respected taught that ADHD is a clinical diagnosis; while psychological testing may be useful as a way to get another opinion in tricky cases where the diagnosis is suspected but not clear, it should not generally be used as a hoop to make people jump through, or to offload responsibility for diagnosis to another clinician. That's not appropriate.

So that's how I have typically operated, doing my best good faith attempt to make a clinical diagnosis, but I am looking at patients on my panel now with fresh eyes and seeing cases I missed before. I also think back to one-off psychiatric consultations I performed on an integrated care rotation in residency, where attention problems were a common chief complaint. How many people did I send off on an ssri, saying "let's treat the anxiety first and see how you feel then" who actually had ADHD and would have had the anxiety resolve spontaneously on appropriate treatment? Even the cases where it seemed obvious they had ADHD, if there were also enough anxiety or depression symptoms to justify it I would usually say "let's try an ssri first and reevaluate once you're not feeling so depressed/anxious." Looking back on it now, I think there were times I essentially kicked the can down the road for a patient I could have helped dramatically and quickly, and it makes me sad to think about.

Once I started to suspect I had it, I talked to my psychiatrist friends who have known me since residency, and there was a general vibe of "I didn't want to be the one to say something, but yeah..." Past experiences all took on a new lens. Could I really have ADHD, when being a good student was practically my whole identity? I was a top student in my high school, but was I actually a "good student"? It wasn't that uncommon for me to miss deadlines. Not many people knew that, but my teachers all liked me and let me get away with a lot. I ended up going to a small liberal arts college where I knew the faculty well--the kind of place professors routinely invite students to their homes. I recall one professor who had a reputation for being a hard ass, who required a journal of our thoughts on all the reading assignments, to be turned in at the end of the semester. I don't know what I thought would happen not doing it, but there was always something else that was a higher priority and the end of the semester came and I didn't have anything to hand in (though I'd read all the assignments and participated actively in class discussions). I remember going to the professor's office to basically beg for mercy, and how disappointed he seemed in himself when he didn't have the heart to fail me, and offered to give me an incomplete to allow me time to do the journal. Somehow I managed to write my English thesis that was supposed to take the whole semester in a week-long writing binge fueled by caffeine and sheer panic. So...yeah. it's possible to get through high school and college and even medical school and residency and not recognize the level of dysfunction one is experiencing-- especially if the person is able to somehow escape the worst consequences of that dysfunction, as I was.

Medical school was an adaptive environment for me. I didn't love it by any means, but the high level of structure kept me doing what I needed to be doing. Studying all the time was relatively easy for me because I knew if I didn't I would probably fail, have no career prospects and be in debt forever. That was plenty motivating, especially because the consequences were not far off or vague or unpredictable. You don't study all the time, you will fail. I was an average medical student. If I had pursued a PhD I don't think I would have ever finished it.

Residency wasn't too bad in the first two years, which were all inpatient at my relatively low intensity program. I never really had to see a high volume of patients. Third year was the best of times and the worst of times. I discovered my love of outpatient, but with more patients to see daily and less pressure to get the notes done immediately, I just couldn't cope. My supervisors were not paying enough attention to my documentation habits, and I went weeks without writing notes, and then would have to fess up to my husband about how behind I was, so I could go in on a Saturday and binge write weeks' worth of notes (from my disorganized chicken scratch hand notes).

This pattern with notes continued in my attending life until I finally got a boss who was paying attention, and willing to offer support and guidance while also holding me accountable for timely documentation. Thank God! Between this boss and Vyvanse for myself and my husband, I may actually survive!

I absolutely love to read and learn and I love psychiatry. I loved majoring in English in college -most of the time it didn't feel like work, the key to success with ADHD. Someday in the not too distant future I hope to have most of my note writing automated and then I can see more patients, which I love to do. I am coming to terms with the fact that I actually learned very little about ADHD in residency, and doing a lot of self study now, both from a clinical perspective and a self help perspective. I'm starting to learn a heck of a lot of new coping strategies, which will help me and my patients with ADHD. The one I fell into by sheer dumb luck is one of the best--do what you love. It's a good idea for everyone, but I think I would have sucked at any job I tried that didn't consistently bring me as much joy and satisfaction as the study and practice of psychiatry does.

If you got this far, thanks for reading this novel. Tl;dr: yes ADHD can present for the first time in adults, especially intelligent women with inattentive subtype. There are all kinds of valid reasons it may not have been recognized before, but if it's been there all along and causing dysfunction here and now, for God's sake treat it! Not to say that people misdiagnosing themselves based on tiktok, or trying to get stimulants to sell them doesn't happen--of course it does. But please don't be one of those people who would rather fail to adequately treat a hundred people with ADHD than let one malingerer pull one over on them. And don't be like me and be afraid to pull the trigger on the diagnosis when it's staring you in the face.

One fun fact I learned from an excellent master course on ADHD at APA this year--atomoxetine works terribly on average compared to stimulants, but that's because it works about as well as a stimulant for some people and not really at all for other people. So it's reasonable to try it first if someone is up for an every single day medication, and would prefer to avoid stimulants for whatever reason, but if it doesn't work for them don't belabor it, move on.
 
Top