Exam Krackers score relative to real exam

[JimBone905]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Took FL1 AAMC prior to content review and got a 490 (pretty low, I know).
But I'm almost done with content review for EK ( 2 weeks out ) and just recently took their EK test 3.
I've been scoring on average 60% for the first 3 EK exams and my score dropped for the third exam (CARS was brutal).
1- 56%
2-64%
3-58%

(CARS is by far my worst section with 50% correct on average)

I'm 6 weeks away from the real test and I feel like i need to do further prep (anki, section banks, uworld, and maybe more frequent exams).

How would a 60% EK score translate to the real MCAT?
Should I retake my FL1 AAMC to see how much better I would do this time around?

Any advice on what I should do from here would be greatly appreciated.

 

[Zenabi90]

It doesn't. Most people here consider non-AAMC FLs to lack predictive value. Most also consider AAMC FL retakes to result in inflated scores.

Take FL 2 or FL 3 to properly gauge where you're at.

 

[BobbyKoch]

I would complete and thoroughly review the section banks, then take aamc fl2 or 3.

agree with the above about non-aamc lack of predictive value.