apps-suck

Member
10+ Year Member
Aug 20, 2005
68
1
east coast
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
does anyone know if there are significant improvements over the 2008? are most people buying the new one even if they have an older edition?
 

MedLover25

10+ Year Member
Feb 3, 2008
166
1
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
Well - since I have a brand new copy in hand, I would say......

Who knows??? It's not even out yet to make that call. BUT, since its about 60-70 pages longer...I'd assume they've added things to it. And since what was added is probably from this past year.....yeah, I'd say its worth it.

Some will disagree.

If it makes you sleep better at night, buy the book.

End of thread :laugh:
 

diosa428

SDN Angel
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Feb 24, 2005
2,662
9
Status (Visible)
I find it interesting that the FA people seem to keep adding so many pages to the book every year. At some point it's not going to be such a high-yield resource anymore b/c it's going to be long enough to be a textbook....
 

Knicks

10+ Year Member
Aug 28, 2007
1,400
8
Status (Visible)
What could change THAT much from the last 2 editions of FA? Can medicine or little tiny details change that much so as to necessitate a "new" edition every year?
 
About the Ads

diosa428

SDN Angel
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Feb 24, 2005
2,662
9
Status (Visible)
Yeah I think it's not so much that they're changing info, more that they're adding info, probably based on feedback from students who got stuff on their tests that wasn't in FA.
 

Knicks

10+ Year Member
Aug 28, 2007
1,400
8
Status (Visible)
^^ Right, but as you said, if they keep adding info, it's going to be as long as a textbook; which defeats the purpose of having a "concise" high-yield book.

w/e, I'll probably end up buying it anyway. =-/
 

DoctaJay

bone breaker
Moderator Emeritus
15+ Year Member
Jan 23, 2005
3,016
50
USA
doctajay.com
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
I've already bought FA 2008 and have been using it throughout 2nd year. For me I plan on just taking a look at FA 2009 (maybe at the library or at the book store) and just adding any info into my book that isn't in there. I think its much better to use what you are used too. Plus the info that you get from doing UW questions probably makes up for whatever FA 2009 might have...but I would still at least look at the new one...not buy it.

If you haven't bought any FA books yet, then I would probably get 2009.
 

fierzer

10+ Year Member
Sep 18, 2008
14
0
Status (Visible)
Well - since I have a brand new copy in hand, I would say......

Who knows??? It's not even out yet to make that call. BUT, since its about 60-70 pages longer...I'd assume they've added things to it. And since what was added is probably from this past year.....yeah, I'd say its worth it.

Some will disagree.

If it makes you sleep better at night, buy the book.

End of thread :laugh:

How do you have one in your hand? :-x
 

fierzer

10+ Year Member
Sep 18, 2008
14
0
Status (Visible)
Also (I was just thinking), another advantage of using the previous year's book is that the errata will be complete so you don't have to worry about typos or messed up facts.

I'd like to agree, but 60 pages of FA is actually a lot. If FA's an outline of what you have to know, adding nearly 10% to the bulk of an outline seems like reason enough to buy the book to me. Especially when majority of it's probably based on feedback from the past year.
 

peludoguy

10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Sep 4, 2007
96
0
Status (Visible)
  1. Resident [Any Field]
I believe that there is only 8 more pages of new content that you actually study, not 60 more pages of content in the 2009 version compared to the 2008 version.

2008 version real content that you actually study: 62-487 = 425 pages
2009 (from Amazon table of contents) 59-492 = 433 pages of content

http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/007...84-2691141-2439435?ie=UTF8&p=S006#reader-link

you can make your own judgement of how important those 8 pages are

good luck everyone and happy holidays
 

Shake_yabooties

Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Apr 15, 2006
210
1
Status (Visible)
  1. Resident [Any Field]
I've talked to Tao Le (author of FA)
and he told me that if you alreadt bought 2008 don't need to buy 2009. but if you don't have one it's better to go for 2009
 

LadyWolverine

10+ Year Member
Aug 17, 2004
1,682
37
Hiding in your closet
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
I've talked to Tao Le (author of FA)
and he told me that if you alreadt bought 2008 don't need to buy 2009. but if you don't have one it's better to go for 2009

I refuse to believe that someone who markets a product for a living actually advised a potential customer NOT to buy the newest version of said product, regardless of whether or not it's any different from the previous edition.
 

34140

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Nov 20, 2003
571
1
Status (Visible)
  1. Resident [Any Field]
I've talked to Tao Le (author of FA)
and he told me that if you alreadt bought 2008 don't need to buy 2009. but if you don't have one it's better to go for 2009

i just spoke to Vikas Bhushan
he says buy 2009 regardless
and that Tao Le is his bitch


:laugh:


also from looking in the "surprise me" part of the preview for the book, they've seem to added mri images to certain areas, like pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which is helpful.

To the OP if you haven't really written in your 2008 FA or used it much, I suggest you get the new one.
 
Last edited:
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.