Failed a competency exam in PsyD program.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

mgrinsh

New Member
2+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2022
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am a rising 4th year in my PsyD program. I had to take comps (competency exam) last week. I was notified today that I did not pass. MLA is 80%, and I got 78%. I am feeling pretty crushed, to say the least. I keep spiraling regarding my purpose in the field and my stupidity. This comp exam mildly reflects the EPPP, and if I'm not fit to pass this exam, I don't know what makes me think I will pass the EPPP. I feel like a failure and beneath my colleagues as well.

Wondering if anyone else has had experience with this. I know that this shouldn't reflect my abilities in the field, but I can't help feeling like it does, and it also reflects my knowledge and intelligence.

(I'm retaking the exam)

Anyway, any advice, reflections, or personal experience is very welcome.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I am a rising 4th year in my PsyD program. I had to take comps (competency exam) last week. I was notified today that I did not pass. MLA is 80%, and I got 78%. I am feeling pretty crushed, to say the least. I keep spiraling regarding my purpose in the field and my stupidity. This comp exam mildly reflects the EPPP, and if I'm not fit to pass this exam, I don't know what makes me think I will pass the EPPP. I feel like a failure and beneath my colleagues as well.

Wondering if anyone else has had experience with this. I know that this shouldn't reflect my abilities in the field, but I can't help feeling like it does, and it also reflects my knowledge and intelligence.

(I'm retaking the exam)

Anyway, any advice, reflections, or personal experience is very welcome.
My comp exams were not multiple choice, but anecdotally, about half of my cohort failed 1 or more sections, so it wasn’t uncommon to fail—all but one person passed on the retake. As a faculty member, I can say work with the faculty to figure out your weaknesses and study hard to address them before you do the re-take.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I’m extremely familiar with this spiral: “I keep spiraling regarding my purpose in the field and my stupidity.” Been there (like a hundred times).

My comprehensive exam was brutal. All essays that we orally defend later. The year after my cohort, they moved to a portfolio format but we were expected to go through a kind of academic hazing with the old model.

One of my questions was on educational accommodations. I argued that accommodations should be highly individualized and cited research showing that extended time isn't particularly helpful for ADHD, but has strong support for dyslexia. One of the professors, who had a reputation for being combative and frankly a bit of a jerk, grilled me hard. It set a really hostile tone, and I walked out feeling humiliated.

I actually did really well on other questions, but got totally thrown off by a few. I struggled to articulate my thinking under pressure, and the whole thing just rattled me. Afterwards, I felt like a *******. Like I didn’t belong.

And, honestly, I thought I was one of the stronger students in my cohort, especially in stats, research design, theory, etc. So it was a real ego check (that I probably needed). As an aside, I would later realize that I have much stronger listening comprehension skills that verbal expression skills.

They let me come back a week later to present a case, and I crushed it. A year later, I defended my dissertation. That experience could’ve been a major setback.

But instead, it became a turning point. I rallied. I prepped, practiced, relied on my support system, and built something I was proud of. Could have killed the vibe of the summer.

Sometimes, the format just doesn’t capture your knowledge or potential. As others have noted above. That doesn’t mean you don’t belong here. It just means this moment is hard, and maybe a call to dig in, not a sign you’re not enough. But you still have to play the game, bro.

You’ve got this. Use it to rally.
 
Last edited:
I'm very curious what you mean by this

Witmer started his PhD studies under Cattell at UPenn in Experimental Psychology. Cattell abandoned his lab and quit UPenn before Witmer got his PhD because Columbia offered him more money. Witmer then went to Germany and got his PhD under Wundt. Came back and took the position at UPenn that Cattell abandoned. He got interested in child psych and ended up founding the fields of Clinical and School psychology.

If Cattell never quit UPenn, Witmer might have been some random experimental psychologist at another university that you never heard of.
 
Last edited:
If Cattell never quit UPenn, Witmer might have been some random experimental psychologist at another University that you never heard of.

My favorite bit about Witmer is that he was, by all accounts, a real vicious critic of any idea that wasn't his own. Some say that's the reason historians of psych didn't spend a lot of time on him.
 
Witmer started his PhD studies under Cattell at UPenn in Experimental Psychology. Cattell abandoned his lab and quit UPenn before Witmer got his PhD because Columbia offered him more money. Witmer then went to Germany and got his PhD under Wundt. Came back and took the position at UPenn that Cattell abandoned. He got interested in child psych and ended up founding the fields of Clinical and School psychology.

If Cattell never quit UPenn, Witmer might have been some random experimental psychologist at another University that you never heard of.
Interesting!
 
My favorite bit about Witmer is that he was, by all accounts, a real vicious critic of any idea that wasn't his own. Some say that's the reason historians of psych didn't spend a lot of time on him.
Supposedly, he didn't get along with Wundt either.
 
Top