- Joined
- Sep 8, 2006
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi there,
Are there any Pharm.Ds working in the FDA, NIH or CDC or drug industry in the areas of drug safety, drug R&D, clinical trials or pharmacotherapy who is willing to discuss about the nature of and education requirement for their line of work? I am from an rural setting and am having difficulties locating local pharmacists practicing in specific area of pharmacy I am most interested in. I have talked with some community pharmacists, but they admitted that they do not know too much regarding a pharmacist's full scope of and training/experience requirement needed to work in areas outside of retail (ie. regulatory affairs, governmental agencies, clinical trials, etc.) When asking about my ability (capability and authority-wise) to pursue my professional dreams with a pharmacy education, I was told by one of the pharmacists that he was not aware of any pharmacists doing research on vaccine development, that this is more of a M.D. domain. For those already practicing, how true is this statement? and not particularly of vaccine R&D, but of bench, translational and clinical research in general? I understand that a pharmacist's role is expanding in the health care field (or so that's what AACP said... but to what extent? and just how receptive are the public & scientific and medical community of this change?) that even though Pharm.Ds could be PIs, I don't seem to be able to find too many as the head of projects, whereas I could easily find ones headed by M.Ds and Ph.Ds in medical literatures. Maybe I just haven't been looking long enough. Is it because there is much resistance from the other members of the scientific/research/grant community? That perhaps the education one attains from pharmacy school is not adequate for the research track? that you could only go so far with a Pharm.D degree? Or simply that while research pharmacists are fully capable to carry out such positions, not many choose to do so because of other perhaps more appealing economic incentives? I guess what I am really interested in knowing is - is there a glass ceiling in terms of what you could do with a Pharm.D? Or is it really what you make of the degree? If the latter is the case, I am carving my own niche Am I being naive and fanciful here? Can I get a professional's opinion on this?
Thanks in advance
Are there any Pharm.Ds working in the FDA, NIH or CDC or drug industry in the areas of drug safety, drug R&D, clinical trials or pharmacotherapy who is willing to discuss about the nature of and education requirement for their line of work? I am from an rural setting and am having difficulties locating local pharmacists practicing in specific area of pharmacy I am most interested in. I have talked with some community pharmacists, but they admitted that they do not know too much regarding a pharmacist's full scope of and training/experience requirement needed to work in areas outside of retail (ie. regulatory affairs, governmental agencies, clinical trials, etc.) When asking about my ability (capability and authority-wise) to pursue my professional dreams with a pharmacy education, I was told by one of the pharmacists that he was not aware of any pharmacists doing research on vaccine development, that this is more of a M.D. domain. For those already practicing, how true is this statement? and not particularly of vaccine R&D, but of bench, translational and clinical research in general? I understand that a pharmacist's role is expanding in the health care field (or so that's what AACP said... but to what extent? and just how receptive are the public & scientific and medical community of this change?) that even though Pharm.Ds could be PIs, I don't seem to be able to find too many as the head of projects, whereas I could easily find ones headed by M.Ds and Ph.Ds in medical literatures. Maybe I just haven't been looking long enough. Is it because there is much resistance from the other members of the scientific/research/grant community? That perhaps the education one attains from pharmacy school is not adequate for the research track? that you could only go so far with a Pharm.D degree? Or simply that while research pharmacists are fully capable to carry out such positions, not many choose to do so because of other perhaps more appealing economic incentives? I guess what I am really interested in knowing is - is there a glass ceiling in terms of what you could do with a Pharm.D? Or is it really what you make of the degree? If the latter is the case, I am carving my own niche Am I being naive and fanciful here? Can I get a professional's opinion on this?
Thanks in advance