Florida Recognizes Aaps

Started by deleted6669
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

deleted6669

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
saw in emergency medicine news this month that florida has officially recognized aaps (bcem) certified physicians as " board certified emergency medicine specialists".
anyone else see the article?
comments on future implications?
maybe from the locals (Quinn?)
 
Kazzi, the P of AAEM, is fighting against this hard which should theorecically weaken the status of all AOA-approved EM residencies, and he strongly implied that ACEP is subtly allowing this to happen....anyway, back to my studying of step 2.
 
If I'm an EP and I manage to pass the exam for urology, can I call myself a BC urologist?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
That's is the whole point...but I am sure there are some more fine-prints about the process.
 
From the AEP website: "Myth: ABEM (or AOBEM) - certified physicians provide a higher quality of care than non-ABEM/non-AOBEM-certified emergency physicians.
Reality: There are no valid studies that demonstrate a difference in outcomes between those with ABEM/AOBEM certification (including those with emergency medicine residency training) and those denied access to these exams, but who are practicing high-quality emergency medicine."

From a peer-reviewed journal: "We evaluated the effects of Emergency Medicine (EM) residency training, EM board certification, and physician experience on the occurrence of malpractice claims and indemnity payments. This was a retrospective review of closed malpractice claims from a single insurer. Outcome measures included the occurrence of claims resulting in indemnity, indemnity amounts, and defense costs. Differences in the outcome measures were compared based on: EM residency training, EM board certification, EM residency training versus other residency training, and physician experience using both univariate and multivariate analyses. There were 428 closed EM claims with indemnity paid in 81 (18.9%). Indemnity was paid in 22.4% of closed claims against non-EM residency-trained physicians, and in only 13.3% against EM residency-trained physicians (p = 0.04). The total indemnity was $6,214,475. Non-EM trained physicians accounted for $4,440,951 (71.5%), EM residency-trained physicians accounted for $1,773,524 (28.5%). The average indemnity was $76,721 and the average defense cost was $17,775. There were no significant differences in the mean indemnity paid per closed claim or the mean cost to defend a closed claim when comparing EM-trained and non-EM residency-trained physicians. The total cost (indemnity + defense costs) per physician-year of malpractice coverage was $4,905 for non-EM residency-trained physicians and $2,212 for EM residency-trained physicians. EM residency-trained physicians account for significantly less malpractice indemnity than non-EM residency-trained physicians. This difference is not due to differences in the average indemnity but is due to significantly fewer closed claims against EM residency-trained physicians with indemnity paid. This results in a cost per physician-year of malpractice coverage for non-EM residency-trained physicians that is over twice that of EM residency-trained physicians."

Branney, et al. Malpractice occurrence in emergency medicine: does residency training make a difference? J Emerg Med, 2000; 19(2):99-105.
 
We had this argument on the emed-l list some months ago. Heated and unpleasant as usual. Some things never change. It doesn't just undermine ABEM-boarded EMs, but potentially all specialties certified by the American Board of Medical Specialties.

To sum up the emed-l list (without the unpleasantries): The ACEP representative states they had somebody at the meeting which certified the BCEM organization and spoke out against it. To my mind they didn't work very hard to prevent this from happening. I was, until quite recently, a member of the Florida Chapter of the ACEP. I don't remember getting anything by mail or email about this issue, which I would have thought would be important.

AAEM didn't even know about the issue until the decision was already made. Now that they've heard about it, they're fighting it tooth and nail.

Yet another reason I am glad to be quit of that state.