- Joined
- Nov 24, 2002
- Messages
- 23,925
- Reaction score
- 13,727
Her Wikipedia page says Congress, in the first district, although her campaign seems to have cooled (not that it was ever hot).I thought it was governor
Her Wikipedia page says Congress, in the first district, although her campaign seems to have cooled (not that it was ever hot).I thought it was governor
Watching the college football games, no masks, and life back to normal. Even the main stream media had no masks on.
Maybe we will "learn to live with the virus" instead of panicking and restricting freedoms, as I suggested a year ago. The UK is considering another lockdown next month despite nearing 90% of the population with at least one dose of vaccine. Australia is a warning to us all.Who'd have think?
Deadlier, more contagious virus variant.
None of the crazypants lockdowns, gaslighting, and virtue-signaling ?!
Australia’s measures flattened the curve alright. Their curve is flat as hell, just on the wrong axis.Maybe we will "learn to live with the virus" instead of panicking and restricting freedoms, as I suggested a year ago. The UK is considering another lockdown next month despite nearing 90% of the population with at least one dose of vaccine. Australia is a warning to us all.
Australia done thought they could half-ass the lockdown in NSW with delta. They grossly miscalculated. If you followed their "lockdown" at all over the past two months, it was a shambolic failure with few restrictions and failed compliance. The other Australian states with COVID outbreaks basically inherited the leakage from NSW. QLD, NT, SA, WA, and TAS are still essentially COVID free.
Australia was always trying to prevent the impossible: Preventing most of their population from contracting a ubiquitous, highly contagious respiratory virus.Australia’s measures flattened the curve alright. Their curve is flat as hell, just on the wrong axis.
View attachment 343071
By the time stringent measures were attempted, there were already 100s of untraceable cases each day. The opportunity was missed.So you would have been stricter with lockdown? Deploying the military to enforce lockdown orders in certain neighborhoods wasn't aggressive enough? Even then what would be the point? We know from Israel that even having all your population vaccinated likely won't curb the spread.
Very few people want to live that way, permanently.Lockdowns work when the population complies.
The issue is that in the US, there will never be enough compliance to make lockdowns worth it. The downsides will always be there, and there won’t be a high enough compliance rate for us to see any long term benefit.By the time stringent measures were attempted, there were already 100s of untraceable cases each day. The opportunity was missed.
Lockdowns work when the population complies. It seems to have worked in Queensland, South Australia, etc. Look at Auckland – they found hundreds of circulating cases, but compliance with very strict procedures has reduced spread to close contacts of known cases and just a handful of surprise cases a day. Elimination will probably be attained again – and meanwhile, the other 3M folks in NZ get on with safe, mostly normal lives.
It'd be one thing if they said 'we're locking down until we have enough people vaccinated', but I don't understand what their end game is.Very few people want to live that way, permanently.
Exactly. Even if NZ gets 100% people "fully vaxxed" it obviously won't significant curb transmission of the virus and they will have a massive spike in the virus which could overwhelm their hospitals just like Israel. I think the politicians don't have an end-game so are flailing, and it's a case of "Do something......ANYTHING!"It'd be one thing if they said 'we're locking down until we have enough people vaccinated', but I don't understand what their end game is.
Even if NZ gets 100% people "fully vaxxed" it obviously won't significant curb transmission of the virus and they will have a massive spike in the virus which could overwhelm their hospitals just like Israel.
Why do we think that breakthroughs in the virus in Israel despite high percentage of vaccinations won't apply to other countries? My point is that using vaccination as an end-point to stop lockdowns is likely futile and unnecessary.Whoa hey now, I don't think we know this for sure. Yes, I'm aware of the data coming out of Israel, but has not been the case universally in other countries with high vaccination rates.
Iceland had a high vaccination rate, but their hospitals did not get overwhelmed. Canada is in the same boat now. Rising infections sure, but not overwhelmed hospitals.
Because that’s not what’s happening in other countries? In fact, the opposite is, so we can’t say that strategy is futile…Why do we think that breakthroughs in the virus in Israel despite high percentage of vaccinations won't apply to other countries?
I'm mistaken then. Lockdowns for everyone!Because that’s not what’s happening in other countries? In fact, the opposite is, so we can’t say that strategy is futil
Israel has also found that a booster significantly reduces hospitalizations/cases in general. Vaccination works well just not for as long as was hoped, though about the same duration as the flu vaccine so we shouldn't be surprised.Why do we think that breakthroughs in the virus in Israel despite high percentage of vaccinations won't apply to other countries? My point is that using vaccination as an end-point to stop lockdowns is likely futile and unnecessary.
I don't disagree with that point. A lot of countries still seem to think they are going to prevent widespread infection. Vaccines or not, that doesn't seem realistic.Israel has also found that a booster significantly reduces hospitalizations/cases in general. Vaccination works well just not for as long as was hoped, though about the same duration as the flu vaccine so we shouldn't be surprised.
I'd say some countries can. NZ had like 5 months with no cases and a pretty much open country (closed borders but open within the country). The vast majority can't.I don't disagree with that point. A lot of countries still seem to think they are going to prevent widespread infection. Vaccines or not, that doesn't seem realistic.
When something sOUnDs cRAzY, it probably means there's more to the story.Exactly. Even if NZ gets 100% people "fully vaxxed" it obviously won't significant curb transmission of the virus and they will have a massive spike in the virus which could overwhelm their hospitals just like Israel. I think the politicians don't have an end-game so are flailing, and it's a case of "Do something......ANYTHING!"
It may or may not be depending on a variety of factors. Israel data suggests a third dose gets you back to 95% effective at reducing infections. Will that last or just be a blip after getting the shot? Don’t know yet. Likewise Delta came and blew previous projections/plans to hell. Will their be a similarly infectious strain that evades immunity/vaccines in the future or is Delta it? Also unknown.I don't disagree with that point. A lot of countries still seem to think they are going to prevent widespread infection. Vaccines or not, that doesn't seem realistic.