Accepted at USF and FIU.....wooooooot!!!!! Good luck everyone!
congrats mike! when did u interview at fiu?
Accepted at USF and FIU.....wooooooot!!!!! Good luck everyone!
I believe I interviewed with you - I was one of five who interviewed on October 3rd. I know Dana said the end of the week, I was just really hoping that I would hear today and the waiting would be over. I will be religiously checking my email tomorrow and Friday. Good Luck to you as well! 😀
I interviewed with you (10/3)! I called Dana and she said that they would get to it next week, so don't hold your breath guys. One of the committee members had something come up so everything was postponed. Good luck though!I hope we all get in 👍
I interviewed at FIU in the 2nd week of September...fairly early on in the interview cycle. I think I was either the 2nd or 3rd scheduled interview day.congrats mike! when did u interview at fiu?
If I did not get in anywhere else, I would lean towards USF...student-tailored curriculum, excellent and very modern facilities, I was impressed with the faculty I spoke with. FIU is very, very ambitious and I really like what they are attempting to achieve on paper. I think their proposed curriculum is very progressive and if it is executed properly I think they will one day offer a great medical education. The only problem is there is nothing on campus as far as facilities, everything is either being built now or will be built in the future.Of these 2, if you don't get in elsewhere, where are you leaning towards? I'm asking because FIU is a new school and doesn't have the scholarship adv. of UCF. So I'm curious on your thoughts when compared to an established school like USF. What did you think of FIU in comparison?
Well aren't you just the bearer of bad news!!
dkb86, so what happen when you got back to the airport? 😀 Did you end up having enough gas to make it home?
I was the second one to arrive to the library after you. I was the other psych. major along with you.
congrats 😀
FSU acceptance also!!! MDean86 and dkb86, congratulations to you both!
I was very suprised to hear I was not even waitlisted. I felt so confident after the interviews. I can't seem to pinpoint what I did or said for them to flat out reject me. I am at a loss for words. 🙁
I was very suprised to hear I was not even waitlisted. I felt so confident after the interviews. I can't seem to pinpoint what I did or said for them to flat out reject me. I am at a loss for words. 🙁
Thanks for the rooting dkb86 and gujudoc, but for some odd reason I didn't land it. I don't know what went wrong. I felt my interview went fine. I answered the questions, for the most part smoothly and made appropriate eye contact. I a was little nervous during the first 15 minutes of my first interview, but that is to be expected I would assume. I answered a few questions, which I read as, "interesting, that's a twist to an answer I've never heard before, but I like it." His facial response to two of my answer had both eyebrows slightly raised (but not related to an alarm), with a nod of his head indicating contemplation, and an expression of the mouth that indicates "interesting." I do know that my first interviewer didn't like my answer to "What is professionalism" cause he told me afterwards and re-worded the question again. But that is the only question that stood out that I didn't answer "correctly", but it is also only a single question.
My second interviewer wasn't really an interview, but consisted more of tangible discussions. She asked me a religious question, and earlier I saw a religious bookmark in a book next to her and thought to myself, "Well, I'm an atheist. Now what?" I took the "spiritual route" because I figured she would like that answer better. I talked about how things are interconnected, for example, you step on a nail, which affects the immediate sequential conversations between you and other people because you are in pain and unknowingly directing that pain outwards in your speech. Therefore, I interact with others to impede negative consequences, such as hard criticisms.
Overall though, I felt positive afterwards. I guess it had to do with other things, such as "not being a match for the school." For example, in my personal statement, I talked about how I originally wanted to pursue a Ph.D. in neuroscience, but decided to look into neurology because of my interest in the brain, science, and interacting with patients, which I talked about during my interview. But I made it clear during my interview that volunteering at a free medical clinic has brought to my attention the need for more community physicians and how I was currently leaning towards preventive medicine (while keeping in mind neurology). I talked about how I wanted to work with the underprivileged and volunteer at a free medical clinic at least once a week. I guess the first interviewer may have seen myself trying too hard to appeal to their mission statement thereby, seeing myself as "selling myself out" to their mission, which wasn't the case. Maybe my first interviewer thought my meditation practice was aloof.
I don't know. What do you guys think? Sorry for the long winded release of anguish. But, I still have hope for all the remaining Florida schools I applied to.
haha yea I hope you're right.!
I was very suprised to hear I was not even waitlisted. I felt so confident after the interviews. I can't seem to pinpoint what I did or said for them to flat out reject me. I am at a loss for words. 🙁
![]()
guess it depends. I know a lot of people that got karma to them at the interview stage.
I have heard plenty of stories of people getting caught lying about things on their application. These forums had a thread full of stories a few years ago. A few years ago a guy I know told me he got rejected from a school post interview because he got caught lying. I also know tons of peple who got screwed in the interview because they couldn't answer basic questions about what they did in different activities. At USF I think they purposely match you up with peoplewho have similar exp. to you for this reason.
But you are right. A lot of people are capable of hiding their true nature.
It is a very subjective process. Bear in mind that the interview probably doesn't have as much weight as people seem to think.
I would like to thank Fiko18, MDean86, dkb86, RSAgator, pianola, and gujuDoc for all of your support and advice.
I've called FSU, and talked with lady in charge of admissions and the chairperson in charge of the acceptances, and both were not informative. However, pianola may be right
I was able to get a hold of the second interviewer, and she told me she rated me with high marks and was surprised at my rejection. She told me the protocol of what follows next. After the interviews are conducted, the committee (at FSU, there are 10) meets and the two interviewer presents their "scores" and information learned from the applicant during the interview. The committee re-evaluates the applicant based on the entire application package, including the interview, and then they turn in their individual scores to the person in charge of acceptances. He then looks over all the information, and decides himself based on the 10 committee memberss individual scores.
My second interviewer told me an applicant may not get accepted to FSU if they perceive the person as not being a good candidate to follow through with their mission statement. Since FSU is a non-traditional school, they will reject those with high MCAT scores and GPAs if they believe they are not an excellent match to their mission statement.
Im just glad the second interviewer told me she rated me high. It clears my uncertainty over my interview skills. Im just curious about my first interviewer. Im going to keep trying him so I can know what it was exactly: a hole in my application (if so, why was I granted an interview?), poor interview, or a misperceived match for their schools mission statement.
^
I see..but i was actually wondering whether the chairperson of the committee makes the final decision in the other florida schools also.
I would like to thank Fiko18, MDean86, dkb86, RSAgator, pianola, and gujuDoc for all of your support and advice.
I've called FSU, and talked with lady in charge of admissions and the chairperson in charge of the acceptances, and both were not informative. However, pianola may be right
I was able to get a hold of the second interviewer, and she told me she rated me with high marks and was surprised at my rejection. She told me the protocol of what follows next. After the interviews are conducted, the committee (at FSU, there are 10) meets and the two interviewer presents their "scores" and information learned from the applicant during the interview. The committee re-evaluates the applicant based on the entire application package, including the interview, and then they turn in their individual scores to the person in charge of acceptances. He then looks over all the information, and decides himself based on the 10 committee memberss individual scores.
My second interviewer told me an applicant may not get accepted to FSU if they perceive the person as not being a good candidate to follow through with their mission statement. Since FSU is a non-traditional school, they will reject those with high MCAT scores and GPAs if they believe they are not an excellent match to their mission statement.
Im just glad the second interviewer told me she rated me high. It clears my uncertainty over my interview skills. Im just curious about my first interviewer. Im going to keep trying him so I can know what it was exactly: a hole in my application (if so, why was I granted an interview?), poor interview, or a misperceived match for their schools mission statement.
I would like to thank Fiko18, MDean86, dkb86, RSAgator, pianola, and gujuDoc for all of your support and advice.
I've called FSU, and talked with lady in charge of admissions and the chairperson in charge of the acceptances, and both were not informative. However, pianola may be right
I was able to get a hold of the second interviewer, and she told me she rated me with high marks and was surprised at my rejection. She told me the protocol of what follows next. After the interviews are conducted, the committee (at FSU, there are 10) meets and the two interviewer presents their "scores" and information learned from the applicant during the interview. The committee re-evaluates the applicant based on the entire application package, including the interview, and then they turn in their individual scores to the person in charge of acceptances. He then looks over all the information, and decides himself based on the 10 committee memberss individual scores.
My second interviewer told me an applicant may not get accepted to FSU if they perceive the person as not being a good candidate to follow through with their mission statement. Since FSU is a non-traditional school, they will reject those with high MCAT scores and GPAs if they believe they are not an excellent match to their mission statement.
Im just glad the second interviewer told me she rated me high. It clears my uncertainty over my interview skills. Im just curious about my first interviewer. Im going to keep trying him so I can know what it was exactly: a hole in my application (if so, why was I granted an interview?), poor interview, or a misperceived match for their schools mission statement.
To those of you who have been accepted to UF: did you get your snail mail package yet, and if so, what was in it? I'm concerned because I got mine a few days ago, and it looked as though it had been previously opened and only a single page was in it. 🙂
Are you sure they were not people from OOS that were in state residents but went to different schools for ugrad out of state??
At any rate, just because one interviews doesn't mean they'll take 50% OOS people.
That's what I thought but someone else would have to confirm.
Yea. I understand how the tuition for residency purposes works. 😉 That being said, I just scanned over the paper and it looked like they might want you to be here a full year BEFORE attending courses to be considered for instate now. It wouldn't surprise me if they changed the guidelines due to money woes.