So this question is from the BR:
The question is referring to a figure, where there are three points: Q, Y and Z. Q to Y is a ramp of unknown degrees and Y to Z is some unknown horizontal distance.
The cart is brought to rest because of the frictional force acting from Y to Z (a horizontal unknown distance). The work done by friction to stop the cart under normal conditions is W. Under rainy conditions, how much work is done by friction to bring the cart to rest, assuming the cart reaches point Y (start of the horizontal distance) with its normal speed and the frictional force is reduced by half?)
A) W/2
B) W
C) squrt (2)W
D) 2W
I chose D, correct answer is B.
Can someone explain why B is correct? the Way I thought of it was that since W= frictional force x d, and since force of friction decreases by two, I thought the work would increase by 2 because stopping distance would be twice as long. Why is this wrong considering conservation of energy?
The question is referring to a figure, where there are three points: Q, Y and Z. Q to Y is a ramp of unknown degrees and Y to Z is some unknown horizontal distance.
The cart is brought to rest because of the frictional force acting from Y to Z (a horizontal unknown distance). The work done by friction to stop the cart under normal conditions is W. Under rainy conditions, how much work is done by friction to bring the cart to rest, assuming the cart reaches point Y (start of the horizontal distance) with its normal speed and the frictional force is reduced by half?)
A) W/2
B) W
C) squrt (2)W
D) 2W
I chose D, correct answer is B.
Can someone explain why B is correct? the Way I thought of it was that since W= frictional force x d, and since force of friction decreases by two, I thought the work would increase by 2 because stopping distance would be twice as long. Why is this wrong considering conservation of energy?