BOTH Goljian Audio vs Rapid Review Path

[PIacebo]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Would you say one was better than the other in terms of helping with path? (Am already using pathoma).

 

[PL198]

I don't understand how the two are comparable. One is like 125 pages of info and the other is like 800.

 

[seminoma]

^And one is years out of date.

 

[messengers]

I listen to the audio in my commute, sometimes his integrations or stories help me remember some things. But that's the only time I listen to it, since I can't read while driving 🙂

 

[FalconSlice]

^And one is years out of date.

Tbh, personally I don't think this makes it any less accurate for like 95% of the audio lectures I would say are perfect even for today (the pathophysiology for most things have not changed). However there are a few things that are considered "wrong" in terms of current times, but I think that if you have not been in a coma for the first 2 years of med school, you'll pick these out (e.g. Using troponin I for MI dx and CK MB for reinfarction instead of what Goljan says because troponin test was not as well established back then in literature/journals.).

 

[Jabbed]

Tbh, personally I don't think this makes it any less accurate for like 95% of the audio lectures I would say are perfect even for today (the pathophysiology for most things have not changed). However there are a few things that are considered "wrong" in terms of current times, but I think that if you have not been in a coma for the first 2 years of med school, you'll pick these out (e.g. Using troponin I for MI dx and CK MB for reinfarction instead of what Goljan says because troponin test was not as well established back then in literature/journals.).

Lol I remember his whole "this new troponin serum test is never going to replace CK-MB" rant.