Good-Bye

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

USArmyHPSP

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
633
Reaction score
284
SDN

As I get ready to retire in the next few minutes, I don't want to get into a Flame war with those on SDN. Posting this will be my last act on the way to IT to turn in this computer. Here is what I tell anyone who reads (and takes seriously) what some of the old curmudgeons on SDN post.

In the Army we have about 1200 HPSP medical students. It's my guess that it is about the same for the other two Services (Air Force and Navy). So, conservatively, you are looking at 3600 medical students in all three Services. On active duty the Army has approximately 4800-5000 physicians. Out of that conservative 4800 – 5000 military physicians, let's say that 1/3 know about SDN. Again a very conservative number. So, we are now looking at the 1600 physicians across all three Services that are on active duty, all have access to computers, and again, have been on SDN at some point either prior to, during or after medical school. How come there are only 5 or 10 who regularly post and usually in the negative? OK, I even plus that up to 25, which is way huge, the question remains the same….

Over the past 35 years working for the AMEDD, I have learned that hard work pays off. The cream rises to the top. And, life is what you make of it. I have seen some come in and from the very first day state that all they want is out (both in peacetime and war). I have seen others come in who are "going to make a change". Some do, some get beaten down and leave wishing they had expended their effort toward something else. Some come for a career, some simply for a paid education. Some want to be specialists, some want to be administrators. The military is the one true melting pot. Discrimination is not tolerated - at all levels. Sexual harassment is dealt with swiftly and judiciously. We have all colors, creeds and religions. There are those who willingly work their butt off, and others who do the bare minimum. Those of us who enjoy diversity seem to thrive in the military. If you dislike it, not so much. It's a job/career that is not for everyone. Much like some cannot be OB/GYN or Peds, while others cannot see being a surgeon.

The organization is huge, it has its own rules and it survives on those rules. Sometimes the rules go in your favor and sometimes not. It has its own systems. Some work well, others don't. Add in extra curriculars like wife, husband, significant other, divorce, kids, no kids and things can change and/or get complicated fast. Your tastes can change. One of the best pieces of advice I was given back in the 1970's came from the lying dingus of a recruiter I had. He told me to sign up for as little time as you can. There will always be a chance to sign up for more later if you want.

Take a step back, and think. If you were working for a large organization like GM or Northrup Grumman. You may walk into your dream job, and 7 years later hate your boss and what the job has become. It's all very personal. Those of us who have been around a while can remember the good ole days when the last conflict was so far in the rearview mirror it was a distant memory, money was free for the picking off Uncle Sam's money tree - take all you want. There was no chance of war. Yep life was good. Yet even then people complained basically about the same stuff they complain about now plus now we have the very real possibility of war...
The honest to God truth is that nobody really knows where military medicine is going. In the last 35 years I've seen many changes and we always persevere. When they closed Fitzsimmons, the sky was falling, and, Army medicine was doomed. Well, that didn’t happen.

The HPSP is a financial boon for medical school, and residency. The absolute worst is that there are not enough residency slots (of your personal choice) to go around and when the music stops you're standing instead of sitting. You do your internship, pay back the four years, and take a great CV to apply to the civilian match a little later. You still have little to no debt while those around you in that later residency will be eating peanut butter and Raman noodles. Flip side is that you will be four years behind some of those you graduate med school with. Is it worth taking a roll of the dice? Up to you.

I know that individual experiences vary (flame on if you will, I’ll not be here to read it), and some may not see the military through what will seem like the “rose colored glasses” that I wear. The military has provided me with a fulfilling career, and now, retirement. Others not so much, but I really believe that 90% of what you get out of your life is your personal perception of the world around you.

So, if you have taken the time to read all this, please take away that the military offers an education, and compensation. What you make of it is entirely up to you. However, I strongly suggest you sign up for a little as possible - you can always sign up for more later if it suits.

And now it is very honestly, seriously and heartfelt, that I thank you all for your service and wish you all the very best.

Art Covi
(former) US Army Program Manager

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17 users
Thank you for your service and words of wisdom. As I sit here dealing with a bonus and pay issue (very frustrating, but I can't say the VA hasn't screwed up things for me worse!), I still am happy I signed on the dotted line. Had I known then what I know now I would have continued with medical school rather than audiology and did the health scholarship program even knowing it would have meant time in the sandbox for sure for me.

My life outlook and at times ability to look at things in a cold logical manner I think has me suited to military life. Sure it's not a perfect system, but the things I see people complain about in mil med are the same things I see people complain about in VA medicine. Different masters, similar servitude.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Thank you for your service, Sir. I remember reading your posts when I was trying to decide between HPSP, USUHS, or moving on to the Line Community and I found your perspective to be incredibly insightful and helpful. I have had an amazing time in military medicine, and though my career is new (currently a GMO aboard a ship in San Diego), the Navy and Navy Medicine community have a special place in my heart!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Whoa....you’re the one that was putting out all that info when I climbed aboard the HPSP ship those years ago. Oh the memories.

*heads off to look at old Facebook posts/pics of the move to med school, the first couple of years, BOLC...* might need a glass of whiskey on the rocks to sip on
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The message I got from this post was that the few regulars here that routinely post negative information about military medicine are a small fraction of the whole and as such their opinions can be viewed as outliers that should be dismissed. That may not have been the OP's intent but that was the message I got. I want to say that this was a thoughtful post on the OP's part. But he seems to have made little effort to answer his own question. So I will have at it. Why are there only a few? How about these reasons: Active duty docs are going to be very reluctant to post anything negative. Retaliation is a very real possibility. Why risk it? Docs who are no longer active may for the most part want nothing to do with the military in general or this forum in particular. We won't be hearing from them. Then there is this: We don't need to post. I could spend days here documenting all the stupid stuff that happened during my time in the military but I don't because the regulars are doing the job just fine. They don't need my help. Though sometimes I can't resist.

I also think that the OP and many others are missing the value in those negative posts. For one thing the regulars here routinely document real problems and often add potential solutions. The Army could spend millions (and probably has) hiring outside consultants who would not do as good a job. If ever improving the system were to truly be a priority for leadership SDN is a target rich environment for suggestions. I would also add that by documenting the very real downsides of military medicine the Curmudgeons are doing a favor to both the military and the prospective recruits. Everybody is better off when a future bad fit looks at these posts and decides to pass on HPSP.

Finally I wish that the medical leadership would try to understand that the problem is not a bunch of disgruntled guys making the system look bad. The problem is that there are aspects that ARE bad. The Curmudgeons are simply documenting some of those things. The military can accept that only a small number of docs are suited to putting up with those things or they can fix those things. I know that the people in leadership are, well, people and that negative feedback is really hard to deal with. I get it, it sucks. Perhaps they see the irony of complaining about the complainers. But I doubt it.

Thanks Art, for giving the opportunity to vent. The saying is, "If a soldier isn't complaining he isn't happy." But you probably already knew that.
Enjoy retirement.
And thanks to all the Curmudgeons. You are still serving in your own twisted way.
 
SDN

As I get ready to retire in the next few minutes, I don't want to get into a Flame war with those on SDN. Posting this will be my last act on the way to IT to turn in this computer. Here is what I tell anyone who reads (and takes seriously) what some of the old curmudgeons on SDN post.

In the Army we have about 1200 HPSP medical students. It's my guess that it is about the same for the other two Services (Air Force and Navy). So, conservatively, you are looking at 3600 medical students in all three Services. On active duty the Army has approximately 4800-5000 physicians. Out of that conservative 4800 – 5000 military physicians, let's say that 1/3 know about SDN. Again a very conservative number. So, we are now looking at the 1600 physicians across all three Services that are on active duty, all have access to computers, and again, have been on SDN at some point either prior to, during or after medical school. How come there are only 5 or 10 who regularly post and usually in the negative? OK, I even plus that up to 25, which is way huge, the question remains the same….

Over the past 35 years working for the AMEDD, I have learned that hard work pays off. The cream rises to the top. And, life is what you make of it. I have seen some come in and from the very first day state that all they want is out (both in peacetime and war). I have seen others come in who are "going to make a change". Some do, some get beaten down and leave wishing they had expended their effort toward something else. Some come for a career, some simply for a paid education. Some want to be specialists, some want to be administrators. The military is the one true melting pot. Discrimination is not tolerated - at all levels. Sexual harassment is dealt with swiftly and judiciously. We have all colors, creeds and religions. There are those who willingly work their butt off, and others who do the bare minimum. Those of us who enjoy diversity seem to thrive in the military. If you dislike it, not so much. It's a job/career that is not for everyone. Much like some cannot be OB/GYN or Peds, while others cannot see being a surgeon.

The organization is huge, it has its own rules and it survives on those rules. Sometimes the rules go in your favor and sometimes not. It has its own systems. Some work well, others don't. Add in extra curriculars like wife, husband, significant other, divorce, kids, no kids and things can change and/or get complicated fast. Your tastes can change. One of the best pieces of advice I was given back in the 1970's came from the lying dingus of a recruiter I had. He told me to sign up for as little time as you can. There will always be a chance to sign up for more later if you want.

Take a step back, and think. If you were working for a large organization like GM or Northrup Grumman. You may walk into your dream job, and 7 years later hate your boss and what the job has become. It's all very personal. Those of us who have been around a while can remember the good ole days when the last conflict was so far in the rearview mirror it was a distant memory, money was free for the picking off Uncle Sam's money tree - take all you want. There was no chance of war. Yep life was good. Yet even then people complained basically about the same stuff they complain about now plus now we have the very real possibility of war...
The honest to God truth is that nobody really knows where military medicine is going. In the last 35 years I've seen many changes and we always persevere. When they closed Fitzsimmons, the sky was falling, and, Army medicine was doomed. Well, that didn’t happen.

The HPSP is a financial boon for medical school, and residency. The absolute worst is that there are not enough residency slots (of your personal choice) to go around and when the music stops you're standing instead of sitting. You do your internship, pay back the four years, and take a great CV to apply to the civilian match a little later. You still have little to no debt while those around you in that later residency will be eating peanut butter and Raman noodles. Flip side is that you will be four years behind some of those you graduate med school with. Is it worth taking a roll of the dice? Up to you.

I know that individual experiences vary (flame on if you will, I’ll not be here to read it), and some may not see the military through what will seem like the “rose colored glasses” that I wear. The military has provided me with a fulfilling career, and now, retirement. Others not so much, but I really believe that 90% of what you get out of your life is your personal perception of the world around you.

So, if you have taken the time to read all this, please take away that the military offers an education, and compensation. What you make of it is entirely up to you. However, I strongly suggest you sign up for a little as possible - you can always sign up for more later if it suits.

And now it is very honestly, seriously and heartfelt, that I thank you all for your service and wish you all the very best.

Art Covi
(former) US Army Program Manager

Enjoy your retirement. Fair winds and following seas, or whatever equivalent wishes hold for the Army.

Posting as you have: "I'm leaving now and won't be around to read any responses" and then delivering a fairly standard defense of the status quo and further implying that those who might disagree with you are both small in number and somehow unhappy because they are deficient in some personal way really does no one any good. I should remind you (assuming you change your mind and do peek at the replies) that the Army selects its officers for the HPSP. If the people who run HPSP think everything is okey-dokey and good as it is, one has to wonder at the interest in or capacity for reflection encouraged by the Army HPSP apparatus. Honestly, what you have written and the way you have written it--adios cum YAGE--raises doubt that anyone in charge of the program even cares to look at its problems. It just seems like laziness and indifference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
This is the gist of the Army’s morale program: (official MWR video)


 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I personally find it inappropriate to disparage the sendoff of a 35 year veteran of the service whether you agree with them or not.

Even the final departure of a senior officer isn't safe from the death spiral of a thread down a negative rabbit hole. In my opinion it is not representative of the military culture/camaraderie in which I serve. We have no idea what that officer did behind the scenes nor what/who he went to bat for. Therefore it is not our place to assume he wasn't fighting hard for the same things we would fight for if we were in such a leadership position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
You only find it inappropriate because you agree with him. It’s pure hypocrisy. A non physician government bureaucrat wrote the usual screed disparaging us. He can’t be bothered to “help” anymore now that he’s no longer being paid and it’s in his own interest.

If he’d written that he was retiring and not the other nonsense, they would have said thanks and left it alone. He’s never practiced medicine. I suspect he hasn’t experienced much gender discrimination or sexual harassment but he sure is an expert about that too.

When an actual physician writes about getting out and the relief they feel, you always are quick to post about how it’s “just one” perspective. But suddenly here, it’s about respect. A respectful “goodbye” wouldn’t have generated that response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
You only find it inappropriate because you agree with him

It's inappropriate because a senior officer is retiring with honorable years for all we know.

But it is classic that you go right to putting words in my mouth and making the discussion personal. In reality, if people are unhappy I tell them to get out ASAP. Never stay longer than your mind and life can handle. No one should ever "tough it out" or "suck it up" if they have the option to get out. Don't like it? Get out! But if you are still serving back the commitment you signed up for and find yourself miserable then you have two options...Be miserable and create a miserable career/experience for yourself and others or exploit the positives and contribute something to the military and to your career while you pay back your commitment. I think that is some of what the OP was trying to pass on. It is still up to us to choose our fate even if it feels like the military is doing it for us.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I didn’t find his post particularly shaming, although he does make the point that most people here with a negative opinion are probably exceptions to the rule with a grudge. I don’t agree, but that’s a common misconception on SDN so, NBD.
I think it’s commendable that he gave so much of his life to service. That’s a high bar that not many people can handle. I have a ton of family who were career military, and I respect each of them for that. I respect him for that as well.

But, I don’t always agree with my family on everything, and my respect for them isn’t predicated on my agreement with them. Same thing here.

This isn’t a retirement ceremony. It’s a forum where people discuss military medicine. I wouldn’t stand up at his retirement ceremony and profess my disagreement, but this isn’t that. And he knows that, which is why he specifically mentioned that he wouldn’t be here to respond. That’s his choice. No one made him disappear, but he chose to do so. Which is fine.

If I went to am improve club and professed my belief in a flat earth, I wouldn’t be surprised by a hearty response. You don’t get a free ticket to not be debated here just because you retire. No matter how you feel about milmed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Agree, @HighPriest

We all have the option to do things tactfully or not. The thread was created by the OP with parting words as he retires. It is his thread, just as a retirement ceremony is the retiree’s. If we disagree with something about the retiree or his guest speaker at the ceremony do we stand up and shame them publicly or do we thank them for their service and sacrifice?

Usually we discuss points of contention offline amongst ourselves. Create another thread. Bring it up later if you feel it is important for the group to discuss.

No matter what just be respectful.
 
I suppose the issue is really a matter of etiquette then. If you create another thread, and that makes it ok. Meh. Honestly, none of it is worth getting worked up over.
 
Congrats on your retirement. 35 years is an impressive run!

Doesn’t change the fact that military medicine is broken is so many ways. You see it as your duty to dispute/defend the system, even in a “mike-dropping” farewell post. I don’t agree with you, but it is certainly your right.

Others like myself see it as our duty to bring these issues to light, partly for catharsis, but also to prevent prospective medical students from making career-damaging decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
senior officer is retiring with honorable years for all we know.

All I can find is a “Mr”, maybe they previously retired from the military?

Although that has no effect on the area of respect it certainly has considerable impact on other areas.
 
Yes, I was thinking the same thing. A GS double dipper.
 
It’s a message board post, not a eulogy or retirement ceremony. It’s perfectly acceptable to discuss and potentially refute the points raised, particularly when they’re raised by the OP himself. In fact, it’s the whole point of having message boards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
And it doesn’t matter. The only reason the comments caused a “moderator” to object was because he disagreed.

The “it’s his thread” courtesy certainly wasn’t applied to the Avoid Mil Med guy’s thread (and, in fact, the pressure on him got him to delete the OP)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Thanks, we get that you don’t like me as a moderator. I also understand that you think I can’t express my own opinions because I am a moderator. This was addressed and bylaws reviewed.

Avoid Mil Med is not a senior officer (or GS) retiring after 35 years of service. He is a junior officer and was using anonymity to spout off things he admitted he wouldn’t say to his chain of command. Then a member of his inner circular identified him via a separate forum he participates in and he went back and tried to cover his a$$. Nobody asked/pressured him to delete his posts. I’m confused on how the two situations are similar in any way.

I will ask again that you please stop targeting me with lies in an attempt to discredit me.
 
As a side note. The only way to do over 30 years is to be ex enlisted, or flag.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, we get that you don’t like me as a moderator. I also understand that you think I can’t express my own opinions because I am a moderator. This was addressed and bylaws reviewed.

Avoid Mil Med is not a senior officer (or GS) retiring after 35 years of service. He is a junior officer and was using anonymity to spout off things he admitted he wouldn’t say to his chain of command. Then a member of his inner circular identified him via a separate forum he participates in and he went back and tried to cover his a$$. Nobody asked/pressured him to delete his posts. I’m confused on how the two situations are similar in any way.

I will ask again that you please stop targeting me with lies in an attempt to discredit me.

It doesn't matter whether Avoid Mil Med is or was a senior officer. It doesn't matter one bit. Deference to length of service is your privilege to make for yourself, but it shows nothing but bias as a moderator to insist that anyone else do so.

Mr. Covi's service term is not relevant. That does not make his opinions about military medicine correct. He was a non-physician program analyst. He does not and never has worked in patient care, nor has he relied upon the military medical system to fulfill his training needs or to support him in fulfillment of his professional responsibilities. For those reasons, I would heavily discount the significance of his opinions. His view is the view from an office somewhere in D.C. or Virginia. In my view, that isn't a place from which one might expect to obtain deep appreciation of the successes and failings of the Army medical system. How would he know the "cream rises to the top?" When has he ever worked on a day-to-day basis with doctors practicing medicine, never mind gained the appreciation from that exposure to judge who was good, excellent or other?

The fact that he retired is important only to himself (and maybe the person who succeeds him.) As for his ideas, he is free to post them or not. He happened to come here to post, he says on the very cusp of his retirement. He did not have to do so. He could have kept his opinions to himself. He could have started his own blog somewhere and posted there, with or without facility for comments. But he posted here, and he should expect the kinds of replies this forum generates. His choice. He and anyone reading here should expect no less.

Most of the moderators I have read here have been very even-handed and unbiased, even though they were actively serving. I am beginning to think you are departing from that pattern.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Guys. Come on. I can have my own opinions on customs and courtesies. Just like you can all have your opinions too. Mine probably stem from my time as an enlisted Marine and may not always jive with yours. But every time someone disagrees with me it doesn’t have to turn in to an opportunity to try and discredit everything I have said or will say. Just voice your counter discussion without making it personal and let’s move on.

Also, we all have bias. That’s what makes a forum work. Again, moderators are not expected to be unbiased. All we do is look out for posts that violate policy and then report them, that is all. Nobody on here ever really violates policy so all I am ever doing is voicing my personal opinion. If you disagree with moderators being able to have an opinion, please bring it up to admins to see if policy change is warranted.

Honestly, the moderator tag is a real drag because I never have to moderate on this forum yet people think I am dictating policy. I am not. All I am ever doing is contributing to discussion like everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Also, we all have bias. That’s what makes a forum work. Again, moderators are not expected to be unbiased. All we do is look out for posts that violate policy and then report them, that is all. Nobody on here ever really violates policy so all I am ever doing is voicing my personal opinion. If you disagree with moderators being able to have an opinion, please bring it up to admins to see if policy change is warranted.

Honestly, the moderator tag is a real drag because I never have to moderate on this forum yet people think I am dictating policy. I am not. All I am ever doing is contributing to discussion like everyone else.
Successful moderators are such because they keep their roles clearly separate. You voice your opinion as a poster and contributor on a forum, but you are acting as moderator when you post your opinion about appropriate use of the forum.

Unlike moderators in the past, you have shown a tendency to try to dictate what is appropriate, what is tasteful, what is an attack, etc. on this forum. If there is pushback, you state that you’re just acting as a poster and not a moderator.

If you are interested in being style/appropriateness cop as a poster, I don’t see how you can do that with moderator role. When I was moderator many moons ago, I was a frequent contributor to many, many threads. I also posted criticism and strong opinions about a wealth of topics. But I also did a bit of tongue-biting and took care to not criticize specific users in my user role and took care to not voice opinions of how the forums should be used. Because you can’t do that as a user when you’re a moderator.

Just my $0.02 and probably worth as much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Good points and well received.

I discuss my opinions and views of posts based on my opinions/views/expectations of the military and military medicine. Not of this forum. I can't change people on this forum, nor would I try. This forum doesn't represent me. Still, I feel it is my duty to clarify to any newcomers to these threads that not all military medicine members have the same opinions, approaches to situations and/or levels of tact.

I say this often, but I can't help it if people assume I am trying to change the forum when in fact I am just expressing my opinion. If you see me changing the stickies, reporting/warning inappropriately then I could understand it. But without that it is just people assuming my words imply more than just personal opinion in the thread.

Nobody but me will admit that some are just trying to intimidate me so I will stop providing counter-discussion when I don't agree with their views on MilMed or any other topic. It's fine if they disagree with me, but the intimidation and slander is getting old.
 
Good points and well received.

. . . . It's fine if they disagree with me, but the intimidation and slander is getting old.

[Bolds, italics mine]

Really? Unless I am missing or you are withholding something, I don't see either intimidation or slander anywhere here. This seems like dramatization of civil but public on-board disagreement, which are normal for BBS.
 
Most is just disagreement, I agree, but there are 2 or 3 posts in the Tricare thread which were quickly deleted by the posters. Those things are still visible to mods/admins. That thread got heated so I understand it to an extent. Claiming I was the reason AvoidMilMed deleted his thread and insinuating that I am using mod status to silence those who disagree with me?

I will say though that you and @notdeadyet made good points. Helped me to realize that when I have issue with custom/courtesy or tact and I voice that, people might receive it as me trying to influence policy on the forum. In reality I just get frustrated with such things in real life and on forums and I voice that opinion. I will try to do less in the future as to not blur the lines.

If there is concern with mod abuse then everyone should feel free to report me. But claiming mod abuse is not a way to bolster a disagreement with my personal opinion on the current topic of discussion.
 
I ignored the slander comment because he obviously doesn’t understand the legal definition. But you don’t have to look far above to see yet another example of selective use of his moderator status to attack someone who doesn’t respect him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The only possible false statement I see in this thread was calling Mr Covi a “senior officer” in an attempt to increase the severity of the posters’ misbehavior. Maybe he’s a retired flag officer or even my former rank, but not that I could find. Somehow, if I’d inflated someone’s rank to strengthen my argument, I’m quite sure I would have received another lecture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
My former guess was correct I think. Makes since to put an engineer in charge of medical scholarships, only in Washington.
 
Top