- Joined
- Dec 10, 2019
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 19
@Goro . Where is the latest recommendation list?
And bad boy list?@Goro . Where is the latest recommendation list?
For what, exactly?@Goro . Where is the latest recommendation list?
And bad boy list?
What is wrong with RVU?For what, exactly?
I can't recommend LMU, SOMA, RVU, BCOM, ICOM and LUCOM, for different reasons. Avoid those new schools that haven't graduated a class yet, if at all possible.
Under no circumstances, even if it's your only A, can I recommend KS"com". See the thread about it in the DO med student forum to see why.
Bingo!RVU is for profit, which might be the reason for concern.
RVU had two students match into neurosurgery this year. While Kansascom (nonprofit) just flunked over half of their class.Bingo!
I can't recommend any for profit school.
KS"com" is a brand new school that has yet to graduate a class. I never recommend such schools.RVU had two students match into neurosurgery this year. While Kansascom (nonprofit) just flunked over half of their class.
I still don’t understand how the profit status of a school makes such a profound difference in a students education. Wouldn’t it make more sense to take student outcomes into consideration rather than for/non profit status of a school?
I interviewed with LMU-DCOM but ended up going somewhere else. What is wrong with their program and did I dodge a bullet?For what, exactly?
I can't recommend LMU, SOMA, RVU, BCOM, ICOM and LUCOM, for different reasons. Avoid those new schools that haven't graduated a class yet, if at all possible.
Under no circumstances, even if it's your only A, can I recommend KS"com". See the thread about it in the DO med student forum to see why.
Students vs shareholders?Buddy of mine just graduated from RVU and matched anesthesiology. Which is making me consider it. What are your primary concerns with for profit schools?
Are there specific examples of these student vs shareholder scenarios that you’ve seen in the osteopathic medical school world? RVU has been around for over a decade with consistently high board pass rates, match rates and some pretty impressive matches.Students vs shareholders?
Who do you think gets priority?
Plenty of nonprofit do schools match people into anesthesiology, by the way.
Look, I don't care. I think for profit schools are an anathema. I'm not putting a gun to anybody's head saying you're not allowed to go there. I just can't recommend going there. Ditto for BCOM Icom and the other clones of those schoolsAre there specific examples of these student vs shareholder scenarios that you’ve seen in the osteopathic medical school world? RVU has been around for over a decade with consistently high board pass rates, match rates and some pretty impressive matches.
Competition for the small pool of US applicants that are capable of successfully completing preclinical/clinical years and passing Levels 1 & 2 is pretty fierce. There has to be some sort of drawing power that these schools utilize to get students that can match into these uber competitive specialties. Wouldn’t it make sense that (at least in the osteopathic med school world) what’s good for the shareholders would be the continued success of their students so that they can continue to attract higher caliber applicants who could have easily gotten in to a nonprofit DO school?